• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


Equation Metal Carbonate --> Metal Oxide + Carbon Dioxide Thermal decomposition 'is when a substance breaks down into simpler substances when heated, often with the help of a catalyst. It's different from a reaction because there's only one substance to start with'. I came across this information in the EDEXCEL Modular Science revision guidebook 1. Thermal decomposition is the breakdown of a substance using thermal energy, this is not a reaction. Preliminary experiment Limewater and copper carbonate were used to see if a metal carbonate beaks down to produce carbon dioxide. This is what the experiment looked like: The equation for this: CaCo3(s) --> CuO(s) + Co2 (g) This experiment was to see if carbon dioxide was produced from a metal carbonate. In this case copper carbonate was used. Two test tubes were linked together by a rubber tube, which had a glass pipe coming out of the cork that prevented any of the carbon dioxide or any other gas from escaping. As you can see from the diagram in one tube there was limewater that was to test for the carbon dioxide, and in the other was copper carbonate. If there were carbon dioxide present, the limewater would turn cloudy (white in colour). When I was observing what happened I could see that there was carbon dioxide present because the limewater turned cloudy. ...read more.


In this experiment one mole of each metal carbonate was placed in the test tube then a cork was placed on the top, which secured the tube from the syringe in place. Once this was done the syringe would be set to 0 so that the results that we ended up with were true to the experiment. The metal carbonate was then heated and the CO2 levels were recorded. After each experiment a change in apparatus was needed so that a fair set of results could be recorded. In this experiment all factors will stay the same, apart from the metal carbonate. The mass of the metal carbonate will remain constant (1 mole of the metal carbonate). The reason why one factor is changed in the experiment is so that a fair set of results can be taken. Each metal carbonate will be tested 3 times so that an average can be taken. The mass of the metal carbonate will remain constant through out all the experiments; the distance that the metal carbonate will be away from the flame will be the same. Prediction In this experiment I expect that that the metal carbonates that are higher up in the reactivity series will produce more carbon dioxide. I believe this because of my research into the background of reactions. This is the order of the reactivity series: Most reactive Cu Zn v Mg Ca Least reactive Na I predict that the looser the bond of the metal carbonates the quicker it will react and produce Co2. ...read more.


From my graph and my results I can see that the magnesium carbonate produced the most carbon dioxide gas, and calcium carbonate produce the least amount of gas. This is the pattern statement that I got from my graph, 'the stronger the bond the harder I is to break when burnt'. Evaluating When I was actually doing the experiment I tried to keep all but one factor the same. The factor that I changed was the different metal carbonate. Each time I tested each metal carbonate three times and then moved on to another one. From my graph there are many anomalous results. Three things can cause these: 4 Water 5 Amount of metal carbonate 6 Distance the flame is away from the metal carbonate If water gets into the carbonates then it will affect the results making them incorrect. Drying out the carbonates prior to the experiment so this isn't a factor can prevent this. Maintaining the same temperature throughout all the metal carbonates is crucial so that the experiment is fair. A ruler can be used to measure how far it is away from the flame so that the temperature is kept roughly the same all he way through the experiment. My results are not reliable because from my graph there are a lot of anomalous results that indicates something went wrong in the experiment. I think that the reason why the results were how they were was because ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. To investigate the rate of reaction between different concentrations of hydrochloric acid with metal ...

    Here are the lessons that I have learned from the preliminary experiments for Technique 2: Problems 1. The readings will not be very accurate as you will be looking at the experiment for a qualitative result and therefore there is a margin of error because you will have to make a judgement on whether the reaction has stopped or not.

  2. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    by using the equation below it is possible to work out the concentration of the Iron (II) Ammonium Sulphate. Firstly work out the moles of Potassium Manganate (VII) (aq) in the titration. Moles = Concentration x Volume Moles = 0.01 mol dm -3 x 19.84 cm3 1000 The volume of

  1. An Experiment Into the Thermal Decomposition of Metal Carbonates

    Surface area It is no use having some carbonates that have larger pieces that others, and it would be laborious, time consuming and inaccurate to search through and find lumps of carbonate with the same weight, mass etc. Therefore it is decided that all of the carbonates will be

  2. The action of amylase and pectinase in varying amounts when clarifying cloudy apple juice.

    Results Below is my table of results for my three experiments. Experiment 1 Colorimeter reading (arbitrary units) Experiment 2 Colorimeter reading (arbitrary units) Experiment 3 Colorimeter reading (arbitrary units) 0.9-0.1 2.9 2.9 6.4 0.8-0.2 2.8 2.8 6.6 0.7-0.3 2.75 2.7 6.4 0.6-0.4 2.6 2.6 6.4 0.5-0.5 2.7 2.7 6.6 0.4-0.6

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work