Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism
Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism
Introduction
Evolution refers to the processes that have transformed life on Earth from its earliest forms to the vast diversity that characterizes today. <Ref.1 - p414>
Up until eighteenth century, biology in Europe and America was dominated by natural theology. <Ref.1 - p415> People believed that a supernatural being like God created each and every species as it is now for a particular purpose, at a particular time. However there are differences in people's interpretation of the length of the "day" mentioned in Genesis. Some Christians believe that the day was of 24hours and the world was created in 6 days. In 1650AD, Archbishop Ussher of Armagh calculated that God, created the world in October 4004BC, beginning on October the 1st and finishing with Man at 9:00am, which is not possible as we have no, archaeological evidence that suggest that a civilised life was already established in the Middle East by then. <Ref.2 - p879>
Alternatively, there was the theory of spontaneous generation. A number of Greek philosophers believed in he gradual evolution of life. Amongst those philosophers, Plato (427BC-347BC) and Aristotle (384BC-322BC) influenced the western cultures the most. Plato believed in two worlds: a real world that is ideal and eternal, and illusory world of imperfection that perceive through our senses. He believed that the evolution would be counterproductive in a world where ideal organisms were already perfectly adapted to their environment. Aristotle, who opposed some of Plato's teachings being his student, believed too that the universe never had a beginning and would never end; it was eternal. <Ref.3 - Aristotle> He also believed that all living forms could be arranged on a scale. This is later called scala naturae (scale of nature), where the organisms could be arranged in the order of complexity. However with this view of life also, species are permanent, are perfect and do not evolve. <Ref.1 - p415>
Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778), the founder of taxonomy, organised organisms in to binomial system, but to him, clustering similar species together implied no evolutionary kinship, but a century later his taxonomic system became a focal point of Darwin's argument of evolution. <Ref.1 - p415> To Darwin, the natural hierarchy of the Linnaean scheme reflected the branching genealogy of the tree of life, with organisms at the different taxonomic levels related through descent from common ancestors. <Ref1 -p420>
Towards the end of eighteenth century, several naturalists suggested that the life has evolved with the evolution of Earth. Also the geologists started looking at the fossil records, palaeontology, which was largely developed by a French anatomist Georges Cuvier (1769-1832). He noted that the deeper (older) the stratum, the more dissimilar the flora (flower life) and fauna (animal life) are from the modern life. However he believed in catastrophism and not evolution, that the natural disasters had driven the organisms living there then, to extinction.
A colleague of Cuvier, Jean Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) published his theory in 1809, the year to which Darwin was born. He compared the current species to the fossil forms, and saw what appeared to be several lines of descent, each a chronological series of older to younger fossils leading to a modern species. <Ref.1 - p 417> Lamarck viewed evolution as a process of increasing complexity and "perfection". A change in the environment causes changes in the needs of organisms living in that environment, which in turn causes changes in their behaviour. Lamarck had two laws to his theory of the inheritance of the acquired characteristics:
"First Law" - use or disuse causes structures to enlarge or shrink
"Second Law" - All such changes are heritable
Lamarck did not believe in extinction, but the species that disappeared did so because they evolved into different species. Cuvier and his patron Buffon vilified Lamarck's theory. His work also did not become popular at his time so he died in poverty. However Charles Darwin wrote in 1861;
'Lamarck was the first man whose conclusion on the subject excited much attention. This justly celebrated naturalist first published his views in 1801...he first did the eminent service of arousal attention to probability of all changes in the organic, as well as in the inorganic world, being the result of law, and not of miraculous interposition.'
<Ref.3 - Lamarck>
A leading geologist of Darwin's era, a Scot named Charles Lyell (1797-1875) introduced a theory known as uniformitarianism, which refers that the profound change is the cumulative product of slow but continuous process that have no changed throughout the Earth's history. <Ref.1 - p416>
In December 1831, Charles Darwin (1809-1882) was selected to travel around the world as the naturalist on HMS Beagle. During his journey, he noticed several things as to difference in species between the continents, - e.g. Species in South America are very distinct in characteristics to those of Europe. Such geographical distribution of species perplexed Darwin, especially of those in Galapagos. Although, they resembled to some species living on the mainland South America, most of the animals lived nowhere else in the world. It seemed that plants and animals that strayed from the South American mainland and then diversified on the different islands have colonized the island of Galapagos. Amongst the birds Darwin collected on the Galapagos were the 13 species of finches that although quite similar, seemed to be different species. Most striking difference was their beaks, which are adopted for specific diets. Some were unique to individual islands, while other species were distributed on two or more islands that were close together. Having read Lyell's Principle of Geology, acknowledging that Earth was very old and constantly changing, Darwin realised that the life on Earth had also evolved. <Ref.1 -418>
After Darwin had returned to Great Britain in 1836, Darwin started to reassess all that he had observed during the voyage of the Beagle, and it occurred to him that a new species could arise from an ancestral form by gradual accumulation of adaptation to a different environment. By the early1840s, Darwin has worked out the theory of natural selection, but as he anticipated the uproar it would cause having published it, he wasn't intending on publishing it until after his death. However, with the advice from Lyell that someone else might come to the same conclusion and publish first, and the prediction having come true, a letter from Wallace asking Darwin to evaluate his work and forward it to Lyell, encouraged Darwin to quickly finish The Origin of Species. Although Wallace's idea was published first, Darwin developed and supported the theory of natural selection so much more extensively than Wallace that he is known as the main author. <Ref.1 - p419>
Alfred Russell Wallace (1823-1913) was a young British naturalist working in the East Indies. His published essay was coincidentally identical to the work of Darwin<Ref.1 -p419>.
Since then, there are neo-Darwinism theory - the theory of organic evolution by the natural selection of inherited characteristics, which is the modified version of Darwin and Wallace's theory in the light of modern evidence on genetics, molecular biology, paleontology, ecology, and ethology - the study of behaviour. Different types of evidence support different aspects of the theory and in order to accept neo-Darwinism evolutionary theory, it is necessary to;
...
This is a preview of the whole essay
Alfred Russell Wallace (1823-1913) was a young British naturalist working in the East Indies. His published essay was coincidentally identical to the work of Darwin<Ref.1 -p419>.
Since then, there are neo-Darwinism theory - the theory of organic evolution by the natural selection of inherited characteristics, which is the modified version of Darwin and Wallace's theory in the light of modern evidence on genetics, molecular biology, paleontology, ecology, and ethology - the study of behaviour. Different types of evidence support different aspects of the theory and in order to accept neo-Darwinism evolutionary theory, it is necessary to;
. Establish the fact that evolution has taken place in the past (Past Evolution)
2. Demonstrate a mechanism which result in evolution (Natural selection of genes)
3. Observe evolution happening today (evolution in action - Direct Evidence)
<Appendix 1> shows the key players of the history of evolutionary thought
See <Appendix 2> for the geological time scale of major evolutionary events
Evidence of Evolution
Paleontology
Paleontology is the study of fossils. It does not directly support the theory of evolution, but it supports the theory of progressive increase in complexity of organisms. The lower the stratum, the older the sediments are, and those oldest fossil-bearing rocks would contain few types of fossilised organisms of simple structure. In the higher younger stratum, it contained more variety of fossils with more complex structures. <Ref.1 - p416 & Ref.2 - p888>
However there is a major criticism to using fossil records as the evidence. There are often gaps in the records, but they can be reasoned by either of these explanations;
. Dead organisms decompose rapidly
2. Dead are eaten by scavengers
3. Soft-bodies organisms do not fossilise easily
4. Only a small fraction of living organisms will have dies in conditions favourable for fossilisation
5. Only a fraction of fossils have been discovered
6. Punctuated Equilibria - New species appear suddenly that intermediate forms in the lineage do not exist
7. Saltatory Evolution - evolutionary rates vary and that some new species arise rapidly, making the fossil records appear incomplete
Darwin himself also considered the possibility;
'I do not suppose that the process (speciation) ......goes on continuously; it is far more probable that each form remains for long periods unaltered, and then again undergoes modification' <Origin of Species>
<Ref.2 - p 889 & p 890>>
See <Appendix 3> for some examples of conditions for fossilisation
Biogeography
The geographical distribution of the species first suggested evolution to Darwin. Due to continental drifts of what used to be Pangea, where organisms are free to migrate and disperse, into several continents separate by the ocean, the organisms had to evolved to adapt the best to their new environment.
For example, in the case of camels and llamas, both of family Camelidae, what we believed as the fossil of their common ancestor originated from North America. However as the time passed, this ancestor spread southward into South America then Africa and Northwards into Asia before the sea level change and continental drift separated the continents. This caused the change in the environment of their habitat, which also lead then to evolve and adapt to their new conditions. <Ref.2 - p892>
Comparative Anatomy
Similarities in characteristics, homology, resulting from common ancestry show signs of evolution. Comparative anatomy is consistent with all other evidence in testifying that evolution is a remodelling process in which ancestral structures that functioned in one capacity become modified as they take on new functions.
Vestigial Organs are historical remnants of what used to be a structure important for a particular function in ancestors. This has risen in order not to stop wasting blood, nutrients, and space to an organ, which no longer has a major function, and natural selection would tend to favour individuals with reduced versions of those organs, and thereby tend to phase out obsolete structures. <Ref.1 - p424>
Comparative Embryology
In the late nineteenth century, inspired by the Darwinian principle of descent with modification, many embryologists proposed the extreme view that ontology recapitulates phylogeny. The theory of recapitulation is an overstatement. Although vertebrates share many features of embryonic development (E.g. all vertebrates go through a stage in which they have gill pouches on the sides of their throats), they do not actually go through "fish stage" then "amphibian stage" or anything as such. Ontology can provide clues to phylogeny, but it is important to remember that all stages of development may become modified over the course of evolution. <Ref.1 - p425>
Biochemistry
Evolutionary relationships among species are reflected in their DNA and proteins - in their genes and gene products. The linear sequences of nucleotides in DNA molecules are passed from parents to offspring, and these DNA sequence determine the amino acid sequence of proteins. Siblings have greater similarity in their DNA and proteins than do unrelated individuals of the same species.
If the evolutionary view of life is valid, this concept should able to be extended to relationships between species. Two species that appear to be closely related based on fossil and anatomical evidence is also expected to share a greater proportion of their DNA and protein sequences that do most distantly related species. It also shows if two species have libraries of genes and proteins with sequences of monomers that match closely, the sequences must have been copied from a single source, a common ancestor.
See <Appendix 4> for example of biochemistry comparison.
Theory of Natural Selection
Natural selection is the process by which organisms that are better adapted to their environment survive and breed, while those less well adapted fail to do so. <Ref.4 - p202>
Every organism is subjected to Selection Pressure, and it determines the spread of any allele within the gene pool. The pressure is based on the suitability for survival given conditions which exist at the time; hence the intensity and the direction depend on time and space.
<Ref.4 - p202>
There are 3 types of selection operation in the population;
<Ref.1 - p44-442 & Ref.4 - p202-203>
. Stabilizing Selection occurs in all populations and tends to eliminate the extremes within the group, thus reducing the viability of a population and the opportunity for an evolution.
2. Directional selection shifts the frequency curve for variations in some phenotypic character in one direction or the other by favouring what are initially relatively rare individuals the deviate from average for that character.
It is most common during periods of environmental change or when members of population migrate to some new habitat with different environmental conditions.
3. Diversifying/Disruptive selection can result in balanced polymorphism. It favours variants of opposite extremes over intermediate individuals.
In cases of microorganisms, they can evolve to build drug and pesticide resistance. As bacteria have only one loop of DNA, plasmid, its mutation would show directly and plasmids having transferred from one bacterium to another, would lead to formation of new species.
<Ref.5 - p72>
Darwin and Wallace independently developed the same theory of natural selection and they jointly presented their findings to the Linnaean Society in 1858.
The essential features of the theory, which Darwin put forward, are:
Observation 1:
All species have such great fertility that their population size would increase exponentially if all individuals that are born reproduced successfully.
Observation 2:
Despite the tendency to fluctuate due to overproduction and season, most population actually remain stable in size.
Inference 1:
Production of more individuals than the environment can support leads to struggle for existence among individuals of a population, with only a fraction of offspring surviving each generation.
Observation 4:
Individuals of a population vary extensively in their characteristics; no two individuals are exactly alike.
Observation 5:
Much of the variation is inheritable
Inference 2:
Survival in the struggle for existence is not random, but depends in part on the hereditary constitution of the surviving individual. Those individuals whose inherited characteristics best fit them to their environment are likely to leave more offspring than less-fit individuals.
Inference 3:
This unequal ability of individuals to survive and reproduce will lead to a gradual change in a population, with favourable characteristics accumulating over it's generations. The development of a number of variations in a particular direction over many generations will eventually lead to evolution of a new species.
<Ref.1 - p420 & Ref.4 - p201>
Darwin found the direct evidence that selection could lead to evolution in artificial selection. Humans have been modifying other species over many generations by selective individuals with desired traits as breeding stocks. Darwin reasoned; if so much change can be achieved by artificial selection in a relatively short period of time, then natural selection should be capable of considering modification of species over hundreds or thousands of generations.
<Ref.1 - p421>
There are 2 basic methods in artificial selection: <Ref.4 -p205>
. Inbreeding:
When, by chance, a variety of plant or animal arose which possessed some useful character, it was bred with its close relatives in the hope of retaining the character for future generations. Inbreeding is used widely especially for dogs and cats. One problem with this is that it increases the danger of a harmful recessive gene expressing itself, because there is greater risk of double recessive individual arising. As a result, inbreeding is not usually carried out indefinitely but new genes are introduced by outbreeding with other stock. While this makes consistent qualities harder o achieve, it can lead to stronger, healthier offspring.
2. Outbreeding:
This is carried out in order to improve existing varieties. Where two individuals of a species have their own beneficial feature, they are often bred together in order to combine the two. Out breeding frequently produces tougher individuals with a better chance of survival, especially where many generations of inbreeding have taken place. This is called the hybrid vigour. Two individuals of different species can be crossed also, but this is rarely successful, if successful, sterile.
The improvement of the human race by the selection or elimination of specific character is called eugenics.
Variation
Variation can occur in population, especially in populations of all species of sexually reproducing organisms, or between populations. This becomes the raw material on which natural selection works.
Not necessarily all variation is inherited. Only the genetic component of variation can have evolutionary consequences as a result of natural selection, because it is only component that transcend generations. <Ref.1 - p435>
Variation within populations
Both quantitative and discrete characters contribute to variations within populations (E.g. height and colour). The population has polymorphism when two or more form of discrete characters (discrete characteristics) is represented in a population. They are usually caused of genetic variation. Having gene loci with two or more possible alleles, variation can be created under mutation or sexual recombination.
Variation between populations
The genetic structure differences between populations exhibited by species are called geographical variation. Environmental factors of the habitats allow natural selection to contribute to the variation.
Cline is a graded change in some trait along a geographic axis. In some cases, it can represent a graded region of overlap where individuals of neighbouring populations are interbreeding. In other cases, a gradation in some environmental variable may produce a cline.
The founder effect is the genetic drift, when a small group of individuals colonize an isolated area, or new habitat and if successful, affect the frequency of alleles in the gene pool of the population. The effect contributes to the evolutionary divergence and it can alter the frequencies of many alleles that affect more subtle characteristics. <Ref.1 - p434>
Speciation
Speciation is the evolution of a new species, which depends on groups within a population becoming isolated in some way. <Ref.4 - p 207>
There are two general modes of speciation based on how gene flow among population is interrupted;
Allopatric speciation
In allopatric speciation, a geographical barrier that physically isolates populations initially blocks gene flow. The barriers include mountain ranges, deserts, oceans, rivers, etc. The environments on each side of the barriers are usually different and this normally leads to the separated groups adapting differently. The evolution of many diversely adapted species from a common ancestor is called adaptive radiation. The best example can be seen from he Galapagos finches as their bills are specialized to eat different food of their own island.
<Ref.1 - p448, p452-453 & Ref.4 - p207-208>
Sympatric speciation
In sympatric speciation, intrinsic factors, such as chromosomal changes (in plants) and non-random (in animals), alter gene flow. Sympatric population become genetically isolated even though their ranges overlap. The isolation can be reasoned with one of these;
<Ref.1 - p 448-452 & Ref.4 - p 208>
. Mechanical isolation:
The genitalia of the two groups are in compatible. For example, it may be physically impossible for the penis of a male mammal to enter the female's vagina.
2. Gametic isolation:
In animals, sperm may not survive in the female's reproductive tract or, in plants, the pollen tube may fail to grow.
3. Fusion Failure:
Despite the sperm reaching the ovum, or the pollen tube entering the micropyle, the gametes may be incompatible and so will not fuse.
4. Reduced hybrid viability:
Hybrid zygotes fail to develop or fail to reach sexual maturity
5. Reduced hybrid fertility/ Hybrid sterility:
Hybrids fail to produce functional gametes. This happens due mostly to polyploidy, accidents in cell division resulting in extra set or reduced set of chromosomes. Autopolyploid is an individual that has more than two chromosome sets, all derived from a single species. Alloplolyploid, more common than autopolyploid, is of two different species.
6. Behaviour isolation:
Differences in the courtship behaviour, with little, or no attraction between male and female, prevent mating
7. Temporal/Seasonal isolation:
Different mating, or pollination time makes cross-pollination impossible.
Homo sapiens
Majority of human evolution too are followed through palaeontology and comparative anatomy of mammalian species. However, the later stages are studies with additional evidences such as human artefacts, which also provides with the insight to how humans have developed culturally as well as biologically. <Ref.2 - p904>
Hominids
It is often thought that the human ancestors were chimpanzees or other modern apes. But that is false. Chimpanzees and Humans evolved differently along divergent branches.
Various human characteristics, such as our upright posture and enlarged brain, evolved at different rates. This is called the mosaic evolution. There were also times in the hominid history that several different humans coexisted.
- Discovered: 1924 ~ South Africa
> Australopithecus africanus (" southern ape of Africa")
* Bipedal
* Human like hand and teeth
* 1/3 size of modern human brains
* Over 3 million years old
- Discovered: 1974 ~ Afar, Ethiopia
> Australopithecus afarensis (first named "Lucy")
* Bipedal
* 1m tall
* Softball sized head
* Lived in wooded areas
* 3.2 million years old, lasted at least one million years
- Discovered: since 1994 ~ East Africa
> Australopithecus anamensis
* Bipedal
* Lived in lakeside forests (?)
* 4 million years old
> Ardipithecus ramidus
* Posture still uncertain
* Lived in dense forests
* 4.4 million years old
There are also several other species of heavier-boned Australopithecus fossils discovered.
<Ref.1 - p660-661>
<Ref.2 - p 906>
The question is whether Ardipithecus the ancestor of the Australopithecus or an evolutionary side branch that faded into extinction. Was Australopithecus afarensis ancestral to any or all of these diverse hominids? Or was Lucy a member of a species that branched early from an unknown ancestor that also gave rise to Homo?
The process of becoming human is called hominisation and it is believed to have influence from:
- The development of manipulative skills and speech
- Changes in sexual behaviour allowing pair bonding and increased parental supervision of children
- The establishment of communal organisation and social responsibility, arising from the principle of food sharing
<Ref.2 - p906>
Homo habilis ("Handy Man")
Fossil found of Homo habilis, dating back about 2.5 million years, was the first evidence of enlargement of human brains. Simple handmade stone tools are often found with the fossil, indicating that hominids have started to use their brains as well as their hands to fashion tools.
Homo habilis coexisted for millions of years with smaller brained Australopithecus robustus. In fact they existed longer, which gave rise to one of the hypothesis that the Homo habilis and Australopithecus were on distinct evolutionary lines, neither evolved from the other. Homo habilis could be the path to modern humans, first to Homo erectus, leading to Homo sapiens.
According to some fossil records Homo habilis was the first hominids to move out Africa.
<Ref.1 - p662>
Homo erectus ("Upright man")
According to most accounts, Homo erectus was the first hominid to migrate out of Africa in to Europe and Asia.
Homo erectus resided in huts or caves, built fires, clothed themselves in animal skins, and designed stone tools that were more refined than the tools of Homo habilis.
<Ref.1 -p662>
There are two models for possible origin of modern humans;
. According to the multiregional model, modern humans evolved in many parts of the world from regional descendents of Homo erectus, who dispersed from Africa between 1and 2 millions years ago.
(The boxed names indicate various fossils associated with each region. The wave lines indicate the interbreeding and the gene flow between different populations.
700,000 years
ago
300,000 years
ago
00,000 years
ago
Modern Era
2. According to the moniogenesis model, only the African descendants of Homo erectus gave rise to modern humans. All other regional descendants of H.erectus became extinct without contributing to the gene pool ofmodern humanity.Advocates of monogenesis model argue that modern humans began spreading from Africa just 100,000 years ago, giving rise to all the diverse populations of modern humans.
700,000 years
ago
300,000 years
ago
00,000 years
ago
Modern Era
<Ref.1 - p663>
Language
Oral communication is not unique to humans. Birds sing, bats 'chirp' and monkeys and apes chatter, grunt, and howl. Human alone have developed spoken and written languages which are used to communicate information not just about the physical world but to formulate abstract concepts of art, science, philosophy and religion. We do not know when speech began but whatever its origin, the basics anatomical structures associated with speech had to be present in our ancestors. These include the lips, tongue and larynx and three areas of the brain, the speech motor cortical area and two further areas also on the left side of the cerebrum. One of these areas store auditory, visual and verbal information, and the other is involved in formulating statements and response, that is putting words together. Studies of imprints of blood vessels and brain convolutions present in fossil skulls (endocasts) show that there was substantial development of these areas in both Australopithecus africanus and Homo habilis.
<Ref.2 - p 907>
Social Behaviour
Social behaviour is developed to greater extent in humans than in any other species and extends beyond pair formation and family life to the establishment of communities at the level of bands, tribes and chiefdoms and nation states.
The course of the evolution of human social behaviour was intimately linked with the development of culture and both were categorised by:
- Establishment of the family (one partner or many wives)
- Prolonged childhood during which time children could acquire the prevailing culture
- Increased use of speech for communication
- Development of the concepts of a home base and food sharing
- Increased cooperation in food-gathering enterprises
- Division of labour by age and sex, with older males hunting in bands to increase efficiency of hunting and women staying together to 'educate' children and gain protection from danger
- Stabilisation of a broader social structure where the dominance hierarchy was replaced by kinship and prohibition of incest
- Extension of geographical range by tolerance of less optimal environments
- Use of simple tools and eventually manufacture of complex tools
- Use of fire for cracking rocks, hardening wood, cooking food and defence against animals
- Development of folk wisdom, art, religion, philosophy, science and technology
Thus we see the basic biological needs of food, sex and safety were satisfied more efficiently by the development of group activities based on a common economic -political- sexual structure enriched and supported by the rapid development of culture.
Indeed it can be said that current human evolution is based more on cultural development than on social behaviour.
<Ref.2 - p 908>
Art and religion
Whilst humans share many aspects of behaviour with other primates and non-primates, there are some, which are unique to the species, and these include art, religion and free will.
The earliest examples of representations of animals and humans come from the Upper Palaeolithic (3000 years ago). Some are carved in wood or ivory and some are carved on cave walls. The significance of this early art is not known, but we do know that such activities require tolls, skill, observation, thought, motivation and possibly leisure.
In some cases the art forms depicted animals and sex and these were often associated with death and birth respectively. Whether they had religious significance is not clear, but current opinion suggests they were not associated with religious figures, as we know them today. Religion is believed to have developed at about the same time as cave painting as evidence by the forms of burials found in various parts of the world. In many cases, the dead were buried along with offerings such as food, tools, and decorative ornaments. It is believed that this symbolism indicates established religious practices. Such a development requires the involvement of conscious intelligent thought, one of the most sophisticated aspects of cultural development. Religion as it is perceived today is fairly recent, the earliest shrines and temples and their accompanying artefacts being less than 10000years old.
<Ref.2 -p908>