FAIR TEST- In this experiment we will only change one factor, the amount of concentration, the factors that I am going to keep the same are as follows:
We must keep the surroundings the same. If we change the temperature, the particles would move faster, therefore colliding into other particles more resulting in an increase of heat temperature within the wire affecting the time.
I must make sure that the volume of the liquid in the Conical Flask must be exactly 50ml otherwise there might be too little or too much acid. This is a huge factor that could ruin my results.
The seal (bung) between the conical flask and gas syringe must be air locked otherwise the gas given off will escape therefore the results will be ruined.
SAFETY- safety is very important in this experiment, especially with using acid. In the laboratory, I will have to be very safe around the equipment and the area in which I will be working in. Because I am using acid, I will have to wear goggles. Also, I will have to make sure there aren’t any bags, coats etc around me. I will also have to keep the glass wear away from the edge of the table in case I accidentally knock them off. I will have to be careful not to touch the acid because it is very irritant and can do harm to my sensitive skin! I will also have to wash my hands properly after the experiment because it is my lunchtime afterwards.
ACCURACY & RELIABILITY – I will have to keep the experiment as accurate as possible to get good results. The most reactive part of this experiment is right at the beginning, and if I do not quickly cover the conical flask with the bung, I might lose a lot of gas. I will also have to cut the magnesium ribbon exactly 2cm long each time but this will not be easy because it is hard to get it 2cm on the dot on a plastic ruler. Even a length of 2.2cm will change the results. I will need to measure the exact amount of water and acid in each experiment, if the volume is not right I could end up with quite a few anomalous results. I am working on my own and have interoperated that it is going to be hard to put the bung on straight away and start the stopwatch so I might need someone to help me with the timing. I will also have to remember to push the gas syringe back after every experiment. It is also a good idea to clean the conical flask before each experiment as there might be some access acid still in there, which could affect the next experiment.
APPARATUS - Hydrochloric Acid (400ml) to make different concentrations
Magnesium ribbon (20cm) to make the experiment work!
2 Measuring Cylinders each with markings that go up to 50ml
Delivery tube from gas syringe to conical flask
Gas syringe to measure gas
Conical Flask to put HCl, H2O and Magnesium in
Ruler (30cm) to measure Magnesium ribbon
Goggles to protect my eyes
Clamp stand to hole gas syringe
Water to make different concentrations
Scissors to cut magnesium ribbon
Stopwatch to time how long the reaction takes to finish
METHOD – In order to make the experiment work I will need to make five different concentrations out of a 1 Molar solution. I will achieve this by adding water e.g. 50ml HCl = 1 Molar solution, 45ml HCl 5ml H20 = 0.9 Molar Solution, 40 HCl 10ml H20 = 0.8 Molar Solution etc. First, attach the delivery tube to the conical flask, and then attach the gas syringe to the clamp stand in such a way that you can read all the markings then attach the delivery tube to the gas syringe. Measure 50ml of Hcl and put it in the conical flask then add a 2cm strip of magnesium ribbon, as soon as its in there cover the conical flask with the bung and start the timer. Measure the amount of Hydrogen produced every 10seconds. Time how long it takes for the whole reaction to finish. Record the results. I have to repeat the experiment with different concentrations twice ending up with 10 results, 5 sets of 2 the same.(1M, 1M, 0.9M, 0.9M, 0.8M, 0.8M, 0.7M, 0.7M, 0.6M, 0.6M, 0.5M, 0.5M)
LIST OF MEASUREMENTS–
1M - 50ml HCl
0.9M - 45ml HCl 5ml H2O
0.8M - 40ml HCl 10ml H2O
0.7M - 35ml HCl 15ml H2O
0.6M - 30ml HCl 20ml H2O
DIAGRAM –
HOW TO MAKE RESULTS ACCURATE
1M Solution 0.9M Solution 0.8M Solution 0.7M Solution 0.6M Solution
I can make my results reliable and accurate by repeating the WHOLE experiment twice and compare my results with other people in my class to see whether they are accurate or anomalous results. This will mean to do ten different experiments in only two and a half hours (half an hour setup).
CONCLUSION – It is very hard to say exactly what I have found out since my results were not very accurate even though some of my results are good but I have come to a conclusion that the more concentrated the acid is the faster the reaction will finish. It is a fact that in my experiment the 1 Molar solution was faster than the 0.6M solution but the results I got and the points that I plotted on my 1st set of results are weird. It shows clearly that the 1M Solution is the quickest and the 0.6M is the second quickest. I have also done something wrong in the second experiment. In my second set of results it shows that the 0.9M solution in the quickest when in fact the 1M solution is supposed to be the quickest but the 1M solution and 0.8m solution stopped reacting after 130 seconds. There was a problem with the 0.8M sets of results; it only gave off 11cm3 of gas! A conclusion to the experiment is that the acid particles did attack the magnesium and resulted in a reaction. In the 1M solutions there were more particles to attack the magnesium so the reaction was faster but as it was doing this, it gave off heat. This could mean the particles would have more energy so would react faster. There aren’t as many particles in a 0.6M solution so the particles would have more work to do so it would take longer
EVALUATION – The experiment went very well except for the results. I carried out the experiment very carefully. It was safe, I kept coats, bags etc out of the way and kept all the glassware away from the edges. The plan was suitable for investigating the aim but it would have been a lot easier to do it with a partner. Maybe if I had done it with a partner I would have got more accurate results. My results were not very accurate as there was many that did not fit my graph. The 0.8M solutions gave off only 11cm3 of gas. This was the only result that was very anomalous. A reason for this could be that the magnesium was floating on the top and only the bottom was attacked by the acid particles or that I did not put the bung on quick enough so I must of lost a lot of gas at the beginning. I also thought that changing the gas syringe might help the results as the one I had stuttered a few times. If I had more time I could have extended the experiment by seeing if the concentration changes the sound pitch of the ‘pop’ when you test it with a lighted splint. I could of also extended it by changing the acid to a different one or by changing the metal to a different one. This way I could see which metal reacts with different acids the most.00