• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9


Extracts from this document...


Name: ashkan mohseni hosseini                               Consultant teacher: Mr. McCormack

Period of Oscillation of a Simple Pendulum

Aim:to consider the time taken for a pendulum released from angle until it gets back to the point where it was released i.e. period and hence the effective factors such as : mass, angle, gravity ,viscosity and length. So I will consider each separately.

Hypothesis: in physics we have a formulacalled Galileo’s formulastating:

T = 2Π√(l÷g)

In which l is the length of wire and g is the gravity and indicates to what factors period depends on. Actually this rule says that the longer the thread is the higher the period is and vice versa.

Purpose of pilot work: now I am going to practically investigate to see whether I can prove the Galileo’s formula experimentally by considering the change in period by changing other factors.

Description of pilot work:  I am thinking of designing an apparatus consisting of an object mounted so that it swings freely under the influence of gravity. So the first things that their need come to mind are: sphere shapes as our pendulum, a inflexible string whose weight is negligible, clamps and retort stand, a crocodile clamp and ruler and stop clock.   image00.png

And here is how I designed my apparatus:

First I put a stand on a table then I secured a clamp at the top of the rod to tie up desired length of the thread which has the pendulum attached to its bottom to the clamp. Then I put another clamp on the rod just under the first clamp and I attached a protractor to it so that I can measure the angle of swing .

...read more.



conclusions: as we can see from the graph above the pink line is the theoretical results which are all in a straight line and the blue line which is the line of best fit of my experimental results and as we can see because the line of best fit can be drawn through my error boxes it means that the square of time IS proportional to length and now how do we know if my results are consistent with the Galileo’s equation as well .well as the pink line lies in the area of my error boxes too so it means that my values could have been those.

Mass: according to Galileo’s equation the period is independent to mass of the object but I want to experimentally prove it and to do so I choice 6 different masses with the same length of 55 cm and I started with 50 gram and each time added a weight of mass 50 gram to the pendulum and I got the following results.

Mass (kg)

Time for 10 oscillations (s)

Time for one oscillation(s)

Period from the equation (s)





































The results above shows I have quite good results and I just need to draw them on a scatter graph to investigate the effect of mass on the period and as we can see according to Galileo’s formula mass has no effect on the period and lets see if I can prove that with those results obtained earlier. image05.png

Conclusion for mass: This graph might be a bit tricky because the practical values look a bit far from each other but if you look at the scale of the time you will realise that each horizontal line division in graph is 0.

...read more.


Systematic errors:  Systematic error can be caused by an imperfection in the equipment being used or from mistakes the individual makes while taking the measurement. E.g. A balance incorrectly calibrated would result in a systematic error. An accurate value is achieved when systematic errors are small.

My most favourable results were the length of pendulum results.  These were very good as they had a high degree of accuracy.  The graph that I produced that compares my results to the theoretical results proves this.  The difference between them was minimal.  This shows that my methods were highly accurate in achieving those reults.  However, there could have been a degree of chance in getting the timings so accurate.  I did not expect these results to be so accurate.

I did not like my angle of release results or my mass results.  These were not as expected, but this may have been down to timing inaccuracies or in the case of angle the viscosity.  The way in which the angle of release experiments changed were justifyable because I could hypothesise as to how the results came to do that by doing an extra experiment (modification) .  In the end, I believe that I came up with a fairly good theory for the way in which the results behaved.  I do not believe that it is possible to expalin the mass experiments’ results.  These were anomalous because of the way that they changed so much with no particular pattern.  I suspect that as the other experiments were faily accurate in their timing, it could be due to the method of the experiment itself - perhaps it was not a fair test.  My end conclusion did not correspond with the actual results but did correspond with my hypothesis.  Therefore, I have no evidence to back up my conclusion, even though I believe it is the right conclusion.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Simple Pendulum Experiment

    4 star(s)

    The reaction time ruler is accurate to within �0.005s. Reaction time Experiment Results Measurement 1 = 0.26s Measurement 2 = 0.16s Measurement 2 = 0.18s Average = (0.26+0.16+0.18) � 3 Average Reaction Time = 0.2s Length Experiment The set-up of the apparatus for this experiment is included on a Page

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Which factors affect the time period of the swing of a pendulum?

    3 star(s)

    I am able to conclude that as the length of the pendulum increases, the time period of that pendulum decreases because this is proven through my tables and graphs and through my background knowledge and also through the formula for the time period of a pendulum.

  1. Determining the acceleration due to gravity by using simple pendulum.

    This acceleration is given the symbol g. G = (about) 9�8 ms-2 The acceleration due to gravity is not exactly the same at all points on the earth's surface Small variations in g are due to: i) Altitude ii) Latitude (the earth is not a sphere) iii)

  2. The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

    This doesn't provide sufficient results because the change in viscosity between each temperature is small. In order to improve this in the final experiment I will use a 30 cm measuring cylinder. This would enable the sphere to travel further, so that the viscosity for different temperature will vary enabling me to see a trend between them.

  1. Period of Oscillation of a Simple Pendulum

    By timing how long it takes for a complete oscillation to take place (an oscillation is from the starting point back to the starting point again. I will count the time for ten oscillations and then divide the resulting figure by ten to get an average time.

  2. Investigation into the effect of temperature on viscosity

    must remain constant so that a selection of data can be compared. Each ball bearing has a different surface texture, some are dull in colour and slightly rough while others are shiny and smooth, this could have an effect on the amount of friction and hence the speed of the ball.

  1. Factors that affect the period of a pendulum

    1.86 1.84 1.84-1.90 1.87 1.55 70cm 2.07 2.01 2.16 1.99 2.06 1.99-2.16 2.06 1.68 80cm 2.10 2.18 2.20 2.15 2.17 2.10-2.20 2.16 1.80 90cm 2.30 2.23 2.34 2.23 3.38 2.23-2.38 2.30 1.90 Results Pendulum Equation (PE): Time of Period=2? Interpretation: On the graph, there is positive correlation, according to my line of best fit.

  2. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    5 = 21 Average for 250C 24 25 24 25 25 123 123 ? 5 = 25 Average for 300C 27 28 28 28 27 138 138 ? 5 = 28 Average for 350C 28 29 28 27 28 28 140 ?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work