• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

factors affecting the errosion of a magnesium statue

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In my garden I have a metal statue made mostly of magnesium. I have noticed that during the year it corrodes at different rates. In this assignment I want to find out why the statue in my garden made mostly of magnesium corrodes at different rates at different times of the year. This could be due a number of environmental conditions and changes that take place throughout the year. In this assignment I will demonstrate using my own knowledge why this occurs. In everyday life I am familiar with many chemical reactions that take place at different rates. There are many factors that affect rate of reaction, e.g.; temperature, surface area, concentration and catalysts, each in a different length of time and way. Temperature is a great effecter of chemical change. As the temperature of the atoms in a substance increase, they are able to move faster as energy is passed onto them through heat. At higher temperatures more collisions take place, when a collision occurs, there is more chance that the collision will lead to a reaction. The theory that we use to explain how different variables change the rate of reaction is called the collision theory. For a reaction to take place, the particles of the substances that are reacting have to collide. If they collide, with enough energy then they will react. The minimum amount of kinetic (movement) ...read more.

Middle

* Next I will measure out 50 cm� of sulphuric acid, using a measuring cylinder, and pour the sulphuric acid into a beaker. * Next I will take a 5cm magnesium strip, making sure the strip it is flat, and drop it in the all acid solution. As soon I drop the strip into the acid I will start the timer. * I will then stop the timer when the magnesium has completely dissolved and record the time in my table. * I will repeat this 4 more times but I dilute the acid with more water every time. * The second time there will be 40cm� of acid and 10cm� of water * The third time there will be 30cm� of acid and 20cm� of water, recording my results each time. * I will continue this until there is 40cm� of water and 10cm� of acid in the beaker. * I will conduct the experiment a second time to get the most accurate results I can. * I will wear an apron at all times. * I will wear goggles at all times. * Any acid spills that might happen, I will clean it up with a damp cloth. * Chairs and school bags will be tucked in under the table. Possible sources of error; * Magnesium strip not being placed flat on the surface of the acid. ...read more.

Conclusion

* More than 1 person is needed. * Plotting the points. I would have obtained a graph which looks like the following if I had used a gas syringe during the experiment: I also could have done more to improve the accuracy of this experiment; * Ensuring timings are accurate. * Measuring the volumes of water and sulphuric acid accurately (concentrations are correct). * Ensuring magnesium strip is placed in sulphuric acid flat. * Repeating experiment another 1 or 2 times. In my experiment I had to repeat a few results which did not fit with my other results. Results which did not fit my pattern could have been obtained because the magnesium strip was dirty or not flatly laid out and another was, there could have been temperature fluctuations, beakers were not rinsed out thoroughly or the timer could have been off time on insertion of the magnesium into the sulphuric acid. I found out that the slightest detail between experiments could have made the biggest of differences to the overall result. I believe that the results I obtained were good enough to convince people of my prediction. * Other people can understand my results. * It was based on scientific knowledge. * It gave reproducible results. * I proved my prediction. * My method was straight forward and easy to understand. * My results gave a valid reason why the statue was corroding. Niall Bradley 12L Mr Finn ?? ?? ?? ?? 1/11 Niall Bradley 12L Mr Finn ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classifying Materials section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classifying Materials essays

  1. The rates of reaction between CaCO3 and HCL

    measured to 0.01ml were to small to measure out 20ml 1 20 x 100 = 5.00% (2 dp) the 5% represents the chance of making an error on measuring the HCl. This 5% does not take in to account human error only machine error.

  2. Rate of reaction of hydrochloric acid on magnesium.

    because it is highly transparent which is very easy to see through where as plastic is not. * The device to measure how much hydrogen (gas) is produce must be constant the whole experiment because the same accuracy needs to be applied to monitor the gas given off.

  1. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Temperature Change Between Zinc and Copper Sulphate

    heat energy given out, but the copper sulphate solution will not reach the optimum temperature until 1.3g of zinc is added. The amount of zinc added to the copper sulphate will be related to the amount of heat energy given out.

  2. Free essay

    Periodic table

    An example of this is retting - where linen is made by putting flax inyo pits of water. The soft parts of the stem are decomposed by the action of micro-organisms. Other examples include fermenting (making wine and beer etc.)

  1. Affect of concentration on reaction

    Method used is almost identical as before, with the only differences of CaCO3 ground into fine powder and weigh accurately to 5g contained within a beaker. Results 2 50cm3 2.0M HCl Starting Mass 5.00g CaCO3 (Powdered) Time (seconds) Mass (grams)

  2. Rate of reaction of different concentrations of sodium thiosulphate.

    These variables will be the same, as the experiment will be held at room temperature and 5cm3 of hydrochloric acid will be added into the solution at every stage. Prediction for Independent variable: In my experiment I will have the sodium thiosulphate as the independent variable.

  1. Our experiment consisted of two samples of water containing unknown substances, and our objective ...

    It is important that we desiccate because we need to make sure all we have got rid of all of the water; otherwise our results wouldn't be valid. We weighed the evaporating basin containing the mystery solid just in case we didn't have time to desiccate it or measure its mass after desiccating.

  2. The Factors Affecting the Deflection of a Spaghetti Bridge

    Method Equipment I will use a ruler with millimeter and centimeter markings so that the deflection and length of spaghetti can be measured to the nearest millimeter; this should provide an appropriate level of accuracy to prove that the deflection is proportional to the mass applied.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work