• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

GM Crops- Should they be grown?

Extracts from this document...


GM Crops- Should they be grown? In February 2004, Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett announced that commercial planting of some GM crops would commence in the United Kingdom following approval of genetically-modified maize within the scientific community. The Daily Mail responded to the announcement by stating that 'the decision - by the Government's Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment - flies in the face of official polls showing 90 per cent of people oppose the genetic modification of crops and food'1. Gm crop production has remained a much debated subject within international politics and social discussion. Conflicting reports from the media which support and scrutinise the subject of genetically modified crops and their safety have heightened public concerns fuelling hysterical speculation. Yet there are advantages and disadvantages relating to the application of gene technology to crop production. The pros and cons of the commercial growth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is combined closely within a mesh of economic, social, ethical and environmental factors that must be considered before answering the question - Should genetically modified crops be grown? Genetic modification or recombinant DNA technology is the technique of changing, and transferring genetic material. ...read more.


Genetic modification of crops may potentially have several health and medical benefits. Recombinant DNA technology could allow the removal of allergens from crops that currently contain them, and enable the production of plants that produce pharmaceutical substances, acting as edible vaccines. Gene technology could enhance the production of vitamins and anticancer substances produced by plants6. Benefits for the consumer include increased storage time, improved flavour, texture, and nutritional content, improved quality and possible decrease in pricing. Although the process of transferring and inserting genetic material between organisms could be viewed as a recent unethical advance in biological science, the fact remains that we as humans have been using organisms for years; Plants and foods as a source of medicine, plants for shelter and tools, bacteria has been used to produce milk, cheese and vinegar, whilst yeast have been manipulated to make bread and alcohol. Humans genetically changed these organisms because only the organism that showed the best qualities was allowed to breed - a process called artificial selection, because it was humans not nature that determined which characteristics were allowed to dominate the population and continue to breed. ...read more.


Therefore before we press ahead with mass international growth of GM crops it is essential that there should be an international moratorium on the commercial growing of GM crops to allow further scientific analysis of socio-economic, health and environmental implications, public debate on biotechnology aimed at educating and informing, establishment of national regulatory/monitoring systems, and issuing of legislation ensuring company liability for adverse effects. More countries must sign the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD), which should advocate the precautionary principle in relation to transboundary movements of GM crops, regulating liability and compensation in relation to possible GM technology-related damage. World trade organisation rules should be amended to allow governments to restrict imports and/or allow mandatory labelling of GM seeds and foods available to the public on the open market, whilst also tackling the ethical concerns of some religious groups who cannot use products from specific organisms. It is then and only then that both scientific communities as well as the general inhabitants of international communities can be confident that the disadvantages of commercial growth of GM crops can be overcome and successfully controlled. Ultimately allowing us to reap the advantages of the growth of GM crops and what is undoubtedly a highly significant technological advancement in biological science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluating the risks and benefits of GM crops.

    4 star(s)

    The main threat to non-GM cotton was the Heliothis caterpillar, and farmers would use endosulfan, an agricultural chemical used in cotton crops. The problem arose that this chemical was it leached into food chain through cattle that shared the same environment as the treated cotton.

  2. The moral and ethical concerns with the use of genetically modified crops.

    we are not allowed to do experimental trials on GM crops, we shall never know the bad things or good things about them"14. The scientific findings of GM foods seem to be somewhat inconclusive. "Scientists do not know all the answers and should not claim to."14.

  1. Should Biological Warfare Research Continue?

    Also, biological weapons are cheaper than conventional weapons, not only in the making but also the materials used to 'build' them. Once a biological weapon has been 'let off', it can spread, thus, not being as expensive because it duplicates itself.

  2. Analysis of Charles Darwin's Origin of the Species

    nest of ants he found "...two bodies of sterile workers in the same nest, differing not only in size, but in their organs of vision, yet connected by some few members in an intermediate condition."(p. 240) To then tie the whole thing together, Darwin defends the concept of an ant being sterile being beneficial to the community.

  1. Should GM crops be grown?

    Non-house brands normally do not make such a claim. Organic foods claim to be entirely free from GM components but are legally bound by EU regulations as any other foodstuffs. Genetic modification is an issue, which arises every day, although people are not always aware of it.

  2. Discuss the likely advantages and problems arising from the introduction of genetically modified agricultural ...

    The world population is estimated at around 6 million it is predicted that in the next 50 years that the population will double, ensuring adequate food supply for this booming population GM foods has promised to meet this need in a number of ways.

  1. Pressure groups are important in the debate about Genetic modification. How would you define ...

    The main aim of a Pressure group is to enable particular interests, opinions and causes to be heard, thus helping influence decisions that are being made. However many people feel threatened against the methods used to achieve objectives and get their point across, which is resultant of particular lobbies.

  2. Arguments for and against GM crops.

    have the bt gene encoded in the plant and therefore does not require the toxin. Therefore less people buy the organic produce and buy more of the GM produce. -It could increase herbicide and pesticide use which is environmental, health, social/ economic/ political effects.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work