reaction.
Surface area (size of solid particles), The reaction between a solid and a liquid is speeded up by using smaller particles of the solid reactant. The reason being is that it is the atoms or ions at the surface of the solid that react, and the ratio of the surface area; mass is greater for small particles than for large particles. Using a powder instead of a lump means the
surface area is greater, which means a greater area
of reactant is exposed and so available for a collision. More collisions
means a faster reaction.
A catalyst also increases the rate of reaction the number of collisions. A catalyst works by giving the reacting particles a surface to stick to where they can bump into each other. A catalyst is a substance4 that changes the rate of a chemical reaction but remains chemically unchanged itself.
Use of a suitable catalyst means that the particles may react even if they collide with only moderate energy. This means some successful collisions are likely. Some catalysts work because one of the particles is fixed to the surface. This makes the chance of a collision more likely. More collisions
means a faster reaction.
Reactions can occur at different rates. One of the slowest is the rusting of iron. A moderate speed reaction is a metal like magnesium reacting with acid to produce a gentle stream of bubbles. A really fast reaction is an explosion, where it’s all over in a fraction of a second.
The speed of a reaction can be observed either by how quickly the reactants are used up or how quickly the products are forming. It’s usually a lot easier to measure products forming. There are three different ways that the speed of a reaction can be measured.
- Change in mass (usually gas given off)
- Precipitation
- The volume of gas given off
Activation energy
In a gas or solution, particles are in constant motion and that collide both with each other, with any solid species and with walls of their container. When particles collide, a reaction can only take place if the energy of the collision exceeds the activation energy of the reaction. Energy is stored in the bonds that hold atoms together in a molecule. When substrates react, bonds are broken and new bonds form. When there is no enzyme reactions do not occur readily because the extra energy needs to be given is the activation energy. The higher the activation energy the slower the reaction. The activation energy of a reaction is the energy required to start a reaction by breaking bonds.
- Activation energy is often supplied by a spark or heating the reactants.
- Reactions with a small activation energy often take place very readily, such as this one!
- A large activation energy may ‘protect’ the reactants from taking part in the reaction (at room temperature).
Chemical equation for calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid.
Calcium + Hydrochloric = Carbon + water + Calcium
carbonate acid dioxide chloride
CaCo3(s) + 2HCl (aq) = Co2 (g) + H2O(l) + CaCl2 (aq)
Prediction: Due to my preliminary results, I am still going to use concentration as a variable. I have decided to keep the original plan, as there were no complications with the trial experiment. I can predict that the higher the concentration of acid there will be a faster rate of reaction and the lower the concentration of acid there will be a slower rate of reaction. My reasons for thinking this is because prior to this investigation I did a preliminary experiment these are the results:
Preliminary experiment
Aim: I will investigate the effect concentration has on the rate of
reaction between Hydrochloric Acid and Calcium Carbonate
Chips
Prediction: I predict that the higher the concentration, the rate of reaction will increase.
Method:
- I set up the delivery tube, bung and gas syringe together.
- In the beaker/conical flask I put 1.8 grams of calcium carbonate.
-
I then added 50cm3 of hydrochloric acid into the beaker.
- Subsequently I put on the bung and took the reading for each concentration for 5minutes, using a stopwatch.
- I then made a table of readings and plot them as a graph.
Trial results:
N.B To find the rate of reaction, you find the gradient.
The rate of reaction of the third trial=gradient
Rate of reaction of 2.0 mole of concentration = 53 = 53cm3 per minute
1
rate of reaction of 1.5 mole of concentration = 33 = 33cm3 per minute
1
rate of reaction of 1.0 mole of concentration = 13 = 13cm3 per minute
1
rate of reaction of 0.5 mole of concentration = 4 = 4cm3 per minute
1
rate of reaction of 0.1mole of concentration = 0 = 0cm3 per minute
1
Conclusion: These results show that as the concentration increases from 0.1m to 2.0m the gas produced increases from 0 to 264cm3 this indicates that as the concentration increased the rate of reaction also increased.
Also based on my scientific knowledge of the collision theory I know that the higher the concentration in an acid the faster the rate of reaction, because the higher the concentration the more chances for the particles to collide more frequently and more chances for successful collisions.
Apparatus: the following piece of equipment will be used to do the experiment.
- Hydrochloric acid solutions- the reactants for the experiment
- Marble chips/ calcium carbonate- another reactant for the experiment.
- Conical flask- to put the reactant of the experiment inside.
- Gas syringe, delivery tube and bung- when connected together, it will measure the volume of gas given off in the experiment, when the bung is inserted into the conical flask.
- Electronic weighing scales- to measure the mass of the marble chips.
- Spatula- to measure the amount of marble chips used for experiment.
- Stopwatch- To time every minute until 5 minutes, so I can see how much gas is produced over a period of time.
-
Measuring cylinder- to measure 50cm3 of hydrochloric acid to use as a reactant in the experiment.
- Clamp stand- is used to connect the clamp on, so that it can be held to the gas syringe.
- Clamp- This is connected to the gas syringe.
Safety: Safety is an important aspect in every experiment, even if the experiment seems to be very harmless. And that is why I will take this into consideration, no matter what.
Solutions, which are not handled properly, are very dangerous, I will also be careful that the solutions don’t get onto our bodies. If there are any spillage’s I will wipe them up immediately. Safety goggles should be worn at all times.
But other than that, there weren’t any bigger matters to be cautious of. Also take out every hazard that I see i.e. put bags under table, pushchairs in. Carries out the normal procedures in lab while doing experiment e.g. tie your hair back.
Fair test:
Method:
Step 1:
I chose to use concentration as my variable, so the
concentrations of my solutions that I have decided to use are 0.10, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50, and 2.00molar
Step 2:
I will set up the apparatus ( as shown in diagram ) so that the marble chips and hydrochloric acid are in a conical flask and a delivery tube is leading out of the top of the flask and to the bottom of the burette ( which is filled with water and turned upside down in the trough ).
Step 3:
I will use 50 cm3of Hydrochloric Acid and 2 marble chips, which weigh 0.90g.
Step 4:
I will then fill the conical flask with the first concentration, place the marble chips into the flask and cover the top of the
conical flask with the delivery tube cork, and immediately starts the timer.
Step 5:
When the timer reaches 1 minute I will measure the quantity of carbon dioxide produced and record my results I will repeat this process through 2minutes, 3minutes, 4minutes, and 5minutes, and record all the results.
Step 6:
I will then use the second concentration and repeat the process all over until I have used all five concentrations
Analysis:
From my graph I have noticed that some of the points didn’t fit with the line of best fit. This could’ve been due to some errors in the experiment, which I will be discussing later on in the evaluation. I can see form my graph that the gradient of the 1.5 mole line was higher than the 2.0 mole line, this seemed odd because my trial results and my background information shows that the higher the concentration, the more gas produced. Here is the table to show the concentration against the gradient.
I have drawn a line of best fit to show accuracy because the points don’t follow a straight line or a curve. The graph shows the higher the concentration, the higher the rate of reaction. My results do have errors in it, but proves my hypothesis to be correct. I found out that the higher the molarity of the concentration, the higher the amount of gas produced. Carbon dioxide was given off more when 1.50 moles of HCL solution was used i.e. 100cm3 of C02 at 5 minutes. This was more than the 0.5 mole of HCL solution, which only produced 18.00cm3 ofC02 in 5 minutes.
The more concentrated solutions had more particles in them, when they were combined with the marble chips; they were able to react because the ratio of HCL solution was higher than the marble chips.
Both my preliminary results and my actual results graphs were similar, but the gradients were different. More gas was produced in the trials than there were in the actual experiment. Looking at my line of best fit I can see that it is not proportional. The graph showed that some points that were not directly proportional were affected by something to cause it to slow down or speed up or remain constant.
Evaluation:
In looking back at the experiment I think it went all right. The only odd result I got was that the gradient of the 1.5mole line was higher than the 2.0 moles. This happened because when I was doing the experiment so much gas was produced that the bung popped off the conical flask. I believe that if the gas syringe were longer the experiment would have been fairer because the results could exceed 100cm3. There were many results in the graph that didn’t fit the line of best fit; this could’ve been due to some anonymous results or maybe human error. The experiment was not extremely accurate because my gas syringe got stuck, the marble chips were all measured at the same size but were totally different sizes and shapes different lengths I came to the verdict that this was because the digital weighing scales were not working accurately.
My results were not inaccurate but they were also not as accurate as they were supposed to be, I find this is due to the fact that I only had enough time to do the experiment once and couldn’t get an average result. My results did support my prediction but not as precisely as I expected, I thought that at 0.10m the syringe would have moved a little bit but this did not happen, I assumed this was because a error happened in my experiment.
I was doing further work and I analyzed a piece of the same coursework on student central and found that their results were very different from mine. I came to the conclusion that this happened because this person had done their experiment more precisely. The experiment was repeated three times and an average of the results was made. They used a different beaker each time they changed the concentration so that the concentrations were not diluted, their marble chips were measured accurately and their stopwatch was started immediately as the marble chips were placed in the concentration. The person also checked their equipment before actually using it so there were no problems with it.
If I were to repeat this experiment I would make various changes in the way I constructed myself and carry out the experiment like:
- I would firstly make sure the marble chips were more accurately measured so that they are the same size.
- I would wash the beakers after using them each time so that the concentrations are not diluted.
- I would make sure the stop clock is started immediately as the marble chips are placed in the concentration.
- I would use more concentrations so that there would be a wider summary of the experiment
- My experiment would be repeated three times so I could make an average of the results, this would increase accuracy.
- Keep the mass and the surface area of the marble chips the same (maybe use the powder like substance rather than different sized marble chips).
- Prevent contamination-by washing the conical flask thoroughly.
- The length of time in which I do the experiment could be lengthened, so I can get longer timings, this would give a better idea of the rate of reaction of each concentration.
- I would use more concentrations to see how they differ form the concentrations I have used and it would give a better spread of results.
I would like to further my knowledge of the topic and investigate temperature catalyst and surface on the rate of reaction on a marble chip, the thought of this is ideal but I know it is very difficult to do.
I found when looking in textbooks that the graphs were demonstrated as a curve.
Bibliography:
GCSE Double Science Chemistry
Richard Parsons 1999
Material World
John Holman
1991
Chemistry GCSE success visual revision guide
Emma Poole
Revise AS Biology
John Parker
2000
Revise AS Chemistry
Rob Ritchie
2000
Revise AS Biology for OCR
Richard Fosbery
Jennifer Gregory
Ianto Stevens
2001