• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

How much Energy is Released from the Combustion of Various Alcohols

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much Energy is Released from the Combustion of Various Alcohols Aim To investigate how much heat energy is released when various alcohols (methanol, ethanol, propan-1-ol, butan-1-ol, and pentan-1-ol) combust. SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND AND PREDICTION Scientific Background of Alcohols Methanol, ethanol, propan-1-ol and butan-1-ol are part of the alcohol homologous compound series, which is defined by their function group of -OH. Below is the structure of ethanol: The general formula for alcohols is CnH2nn+1OH. As I have proved earlier on in my prediction, larger alcohol chains have release more energy when combusted because they have more bonds, but this also means they have a higher boiling point: Alcohol Formula Boiling point (oC) Methanol CH3OH 65 Ethanol C2H5OH 78 Propan-1-ol C3H7OH 97 Butan-1-ol C4H9OH 117 Pentan-1-ol C5H11OH 137 Ethanol burns with the following equation: Ethanol + oxygen ==> carbon dioxide + water 2CH3OH + 3O2 ==> 2CO2 + 4H2O This means that the burning of an alcohol (in this case ethanol) releases only carbon dioxide and water, which are environmentally friendly products so alcohols as fuels are environmentally friendly. The production of alcohol is also easy. It can be fermented: Glucose ==> ethanol + carbon dioxide Which is environmentally friendly or through the hydration of ethene: C2H4(g) + H2O(g) C2H5OH(g) Prediction I believe that larger chains of alcohol (e.g. propan-1-ol) will combust to release more heat per a mol than a shorter chain of alcohol s(e.g. ethanol). Scientific basis I believe this because using bond energies we can find out the energy stored in 1 mol or reactant and see how much energy is lost (endothermic reaction) ...read more.

Middle

The container should be as close to the wick as possible. The can will be placed just above the tip of the flame. Starting temperature of water: This should be similar all the way through, because of factors leading to evaporation of water due to higher temperatures. This should not matter too much as room temperature should remain constant. This cannot be changed and is not very significant either. Draft shields: Can affect how much heat gets to the container. A draft shield will be used. Stirring: Stirring the water in the can makes the water heat up faster. Therefore stirring can affect the results obtained. The cans should be stirred at a constant rate throughout the heating. Safety Safety goggles were worn throughout the experiment. Care was taken not to ingest the alcohol. Diagram Method The apparatus was set up as above. The starting temperature of the 250ml of water was noted. The water was put into an aluminium Coke(tm) can. The spirit burner was weighed with its cap on and then put under the can so that the tip of the flame was just touching the bottom of the can. The cap was taken off and the wick lighted as soon as possible (so that the alcohol would not evaporate). During the heating of the water, the water was stirred at a constant rate so that it would heat the water evenly and the water would heat up faster. Once the water reached 20oC above it's starting temperature (usually around 42oC), the flame of the spirit burner was blown out, the cap replaced and weighed again as quickly as possible. ...read more.

Conclusion

This meant that a fast burning spirit burner would use more alcohol to heat the water up by 200C than a slow burner. This could be corrected by using the same spirit burner for every alcohol. * At the bottom of the can was carbon, which showed incomplete combustion and insulated the water from the heat of the burner. This meant that not all of the alcohol was being combusted to produce heat, carbon dioxide and water, some was also producing carbon. This also meant that an insulator had been formed and results after the first experiment would be inaccurate as a result. This could be corrected by using a different can for each experiment so there would be no insulating carbon layer at the start. * Alcohol was still lost after the initial weighing and before the final mass weighing through evaporation, as sometimes, due to disorganisation, the wicks were not lighted immediately after the mass reading had been taken. This meant that some of the results were inaccurate. Ensuring organisation and keeping a ready supply of spills and a burning Bunsen on the table could correct this. * Stirring was not entirely accurate due to human error. This meant that when the water was being stirred faster the water heated up faster and less alcohol was combusted than should have been. This could be corrected next time by not stirring the water at all (but this would take a long time for the water to heat up) or using a machine to stir the water at a constant speed. * Some of the heat from the burner was lost to the surroundings. This cannot be corrected. * * * * Chemistry coursework DeveshPAREKH 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Organic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Organic Chemistry essays

  1. Investigating the Combustion of Alcohols

    = 75 � -4.2 � 25 = -7875 J The number of moles of propan-1-ol burned is calculated by the following steps: Mass of 1 mol of propan-1-ol, C3H7OH = (12�3) + (8�1) + 16 = 60 g Number of moles of propan-1-ol burned = mass burned mass of 1

  2. Molar Heat of Combustion of Alcohols

    853 From our original results it may have seemed like the beaker had performed the best but the beaker also used a lot of fuel. From both the graph and the table (above), we can see that the copper calorimeter performed clearly better than the other two.

  1. Comparing the heat energy produced by combustion of various alcohols

    as the condition changed, the heat energy from the flame wouldn't all goes to the water, and therefore it will change the temperature of the water. I predict that the more bonds there are holding the carbon, oxygen and hydrogen atoms together, more energy will be required to break them apart.

  2. Investigating the energy released from burning different alcohols.

    * Stand and clamp - these pieces of apparatus will be needed to hold the thermometer in place, if the thermometer is not held in place, the thermometer would rest on the copper beaker and will be measuring the temperature of the copper beaker not the water.

  1. An experiment to investigate the factors that determine the amount of energy released when ...

    I will do this by using different alcohols each time, which contain different numbers of carbon atoms. Although I will measure out the amount of alcohol by its volume, I will later work out its moles using several techniques. This will give me larger scope for my results and graphs.

  2. A Comparison of the Energy Released When Different Fuels are burned.

    11 x 413 = 4543 (C-O) 358 = 358 (O-H) 464 = 464 71/2(O=O) 7 x 498 = 3486 4(C-C) 4 x 612 = 2448 + 11199 KJ/mol Sum of bond energies formed: 10(O=C) 10 x 805 = 8050 12(H-O)

  1. The Energy Content Of Different Fuels

    Energy produced per mole = energy produced to heat the water No. of moles of fuel used Energy produced per mole = 7245 / 0.06875 = 105381.82/ 1000 = 105.382 kjmol-1 Average of Methanol: Average (excluding preliminary) = (166.825 + 123.79 + 105.382)

  2. To Investigate the Combustion of Fuels

    appears in the products, multiplied by the number of times it appears: C=O x 4 = 2960 KJ mol-1 O-H x 8 = 3680 KJ mol-1 6640 KJ mol-1 Energy released forming bonds Finally, we take away the energy used breaking the bonds from the energy released forming the bonds

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work