• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I aim to find out if the mass of an object affects the speed at which it falls.

Extracts from this document...


Falling Objects


I aim to find out if the mass of an object affects the speed at which it falls.

I predict that the mass will not alter the speed, as it will reach terminal velocity. I think that all the results will stay roughly the same even though I have changed the mass. When something falls, its potential energy is changed into kinetic energy. Therefore the only thing in this experiment that could alter the speed at which it falls is the air resistance and the height. (These would change the time at which the object is in the air). Theoretically, as I am keeping these the same, the speed should not change.

The scientist Galileo proved this.

This is a quote taken from the Galileo Timeline. (http://es.rice.edu/ES/humsoc/galileo/galileo_timeline.html)

"1589-1592 Teaches mathematical subjects at the University of Pisa (salary 160 scudi per year). Some tracts--lecture notes--written during this period have survived. In OnmotionGalileo uses the Archimedian approach to motion: the speed of falling bodies is proportional to their density, not their weight as Aristotle had maintained.

According to Vincenzo Viviani

...read more.



Weight (g)

Speed m/s (2.D.P)

Average m/s




































As you can see I have taken three sets of results for each mass and used the average, to make my results accurate.


My results have proved my prediction, that the mass would not affect the speed. This is made clear by this scatter graph, with a line of best fit.


To prove

...read more.


If I used a mechanism to drop the object this would help eliminate spinning. However, the sand was sometimes uneven inside the container so this would make the object spin at the start. The other problem with spinning was that the object would have fallen faster when it spun because it would have less air resistance. It would have been more accurate if I had used weights of the same size but different mass, instead of sand.

Also, when I dropped the container, I may have not dropped it from exactly the same distance every time. I also may have added force to the object with force when I dropped it. The mechanism would have also stopped this.

This would be a diagram of the mechanism I would use if I were to do it again.





When I pull the string, the mechanism would drop the object evenly.

Even with all these minor problems my results are still very accurate.

I now know for a fact that my prediction is correct because I have proved it in 3 different ways,

  • Using a practical test (experiment)
  • Using theoretical calculations (The formulas)
  • Using other people results as well as my own.

Daniel Hill 10S        25310.doc        Page  of

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a good report of an investigation
1. The report is well structured, although the plan could be broken up to include additional subheadings.
2. The prediction includes well researched science.
3. The evaluation is the strongest section of the report.
4. The analysis contains good calculations, although this needs to be compared to the results that have been obtained.
*** (3 stars)

Marked by teacher Luke Smithen 22/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. investigate the size of craters in sand when a marble is dropped

    All the lines are very steep and start getting less so as the 'height from which the marble is dropped' gets higher. All the lines follow the same trend. On my graph two of my lines intercept. This only happens because my results cannot be 100% accurate.

  2. Investigate and measure the speed of a ball rolling down a ramp.

    against Kinetic energy exerted 5 Kinetic energy against Friction Force Graph number one, provides evidence for my first prediction, which is that as the angle of elevation increase the speed of the ball increases too. And the graph shows that by starting first starting off, and going in a positively skewed straight line.

  1. Investigating the effect of mass on a parachute

    Run 1.61 1.12 0.77 0.66 4th Run 1.43 0.93 0.70 0.70 5th Run 1.76 0.99 0.76 0.63 6th Run 1.60 1.12 0.71 0.72 7th Run 1.29 1.22 0.68 0.65 8th Run 1.67 1.03 0.79 0.62 9th Run 1.52 1.01 0.81 0.66 10th Run 1.55 0.96 0.78 0.68 After constructing a

  2. Investigation is to see how changing the height of a ramp affects the stopping ...

    The graphs that I drew matched my predictions, i.e. it was a curve and also showing a positive relationship between stopping distance and the speed of the toy car. As I have mentioned I did come across one anomaly, this was when the ramp was 8cm high the average initial velocity was 109.10 and the average stopping distance was 169.49.

  1. Investigating the factors affecting the speed at which a parachute falls.

    For our preliminary work we established what height we should drop the parachute from. We tried dropping the parachute from the height of the table top and found that the time it took to fall to the ground was too short to be accurate.

  2. Viscosity - Comparing the viscosities of different liquids.

    I will position a ruler by the side of the cylinder and use tape to mark equal distances on the cylinder. Since in some of the liquids I have chosen the ball bearing may move relatively fast, I will need to mark slightly larger distances in order to get more accurate time readings.

  1. Terminal velocity of a falling ball.

    = 1.0cm of ball bearing Area of sphere = 2 / 3*pi r � Error = + or - 0.05cm = 5% error Hence micrometer accuracy = 1 / 1000 mm Ball bearing 1 cm - 1.0 Error = 0.0005 cm % Error = 0.05 Other errors that might occur during the investigation could be experimental errors.

  2. Report on Newton's laws of motion

    However, how to determine the amount of change in velocity will be determined later using Newton?s second law of motion (Serway, 2004). Now assume that someone parks a car on a flat road and forgets to put the vehicle into park.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work