• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this investigation, two different shores with different levels of exposure were surveyed. Based upon this survey, the level of exposure for each shore was determined using Ballantines exposure scale.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction: Seashores can vary greatly in nature from one another. One of the factors that is most responsible for this diversity is the level of exposure to which the shore and the organisms that make it their home are subjected. In this investigation, two different shores with different levels of exposure were surveyed. Based upon this survey, the level of exposure for each shore was determined using Ballantines exposure scale. This scale uses the presence, absence and level of abundance of particular organisms to rate the level of exposure of the shore ranging from very exposed to very sheltered. Additionally, the shores were compared and important differences were noted. This comparison indicates which organisms prefer more exposed environments and which prefer more sheltered ones. In addition to the general survey, two specific projects were undertaken to more closely examine a particular aspect of the shores life. The first project, carried out at the more sheltered site (coordinates 22, 10 on the provided map), examined the length of brown algae and its relation to the age of the algae. Two species of brown algae were measured in this examination, Fucus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum. The presence of Polysiphonia lanosa on the Ascophyllum was also noted. ...read more.

Middle

Top shells, particularly Gibbula umbilicalis, and Littorina neritoides were abundant on the exposed shore but were not present on the sheltered shore. Also on the exposed shore Mytilus edulis , the mussels, and Paracentrotus lividus, the purple sea urchins, were abundant, and Actinea equina, the red sea anemones, were occasional while none of these species were found on the sheltered shore site. This being said however, there were similarities between the sites as well, for example neither site had more than a few individuals of Laminaria species or the other kelps other than Himanthalia elongata. Also Littorina saxatilis was absent on both shores and both shores had many Balanus species barnicles and Patella species limpets. Ballantine's exposure scale was then applied to both shores. Based on the presence and absence of the particluar species used by Ballantine to classify the shores, the more sheltered site can be classified as a fairly sheltered shore, although within this classification it leans toward the more sheltered side. This is because it did exhibit some characteristics of a sheltered shore even though in the end more characteristics pointed to the fairly sheltered classification. Using the same technique, the more exposed site can be classified as an exposed shore but like above it leans within this category, this time toward the very exposed side. ...read more.

Conclusion

No strong correlation was found for either the Patella species limpets (R = 0.405) or the Actinea equina (0.313). This is not wholey unexpected however, as the zone measured layed entirely in the eulittoral zone and the habitats in the different quadrants were therefore quite similar. Next the average, max, min and median number each species per 0.25 square meter was calculated (table 2). These results show, at least in this zone of the shore, that the Patella species is more common than the Actinea equina although, as in the first project, the sample size is again small. Table 2 Avg number per 0.25 square meter Max number per 0.25 square meter Min number per 0.25 square meter Median number per 0.25 square meter Patella species 76 144 27 81 Actinea equina 28 144 2 11 Conclusions: This investigation clearly shows how different shores are due to different levels of exposure. The first shore was classified as a fairly sheltered shore according to Ballantines exposure scale while the second was classified as an exposed shore. It was clearly visible in examining which organisms were present at each site that some organisms prefer the more sheltered type of shore while others prefer a more exposed environment. Additionally, some organisms were present in high numbers at both sites and therefore probablly don't care about the level of exposure as much as the organisms present at only one site or the other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Living Things in their Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Living Things in their Environment essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Research question - Is using dogs for work ethical?

    5 star(s)

    dog would usually have an owner who is clean and nicely groomed. Also, a messy looking dog would usually have an owner which is less organized and messy. So people reflect their personality or how they look onto their pets.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Find out the relationship between the districution of bladders and the degree of exposure ...

    4 star(s)

    is covered by water a large percentage of the time, but then sometimes is left exposed from the salty water. Bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) has pairs of air bladders which float its fronds towards the light. Like most algae many variants develop in response to changes in environmental factors, on wave exposed shores a bladderless form occurs.

  1. What amounts of vitamin C are in different brands of orange juice.

    As a decimal it's 0.24. There is 7.20ml of vitamin C per 10ml. This is the figure I came up with. So 7.20x100 = 720 0.125x100 = 12.5 720 divided by 12.5 = 57.6 divided by 2 = 28.8 Just Juice: 30mg of vitamin C per 100 ml is the amount stated by the manufacturer.

  2. Branded Bleach is more effective at killing E. coli than Non branded bleach - ...

    difference between the experiment in the method and the one practiced and that is that the concentration of bleach. Due time constraints imposed on the experiment only one concentration was used. Based on the preliminary findings it appears that the appropriate concentration 25% as it provides a perfectly suitable zone of inhibition for measurement.

  1. An investigation in the different species of plant life through bare sand and grassland ...

    * When using the quadrant I laid it down directly in front of the first ranging pole and recorded the percent of the different species of plants. * This procedure was carried out at each site, which is moving over the dune 2m at a time.

  2. An Investigation of the Diversity and Abundance of Ground Flora in Coppices of Different ...

    If this proves to be correct, then I also expect there to be greater biomass in the young coppice. SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF HYPOTHESIS What is meant by diversity? This is simply the variety of different animal or plant species in a given area.

  1. An Investigation into the water quality of the River Banwell in

    .569 .629 1.201 20 C Dissolved oxygen (percentage saturation) 80.47 22.34 51.84 17 D As you can read from the graph the Biochemical oxygen demand was at 5.73mg/l where the national average was 4.88mg/l a huge difference which was leading to "impoverished ecosystems" and was "Vulnerable to pollution" and was issued an E.

  2. Rocky Shore Study

    water mark 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Rough Periwinkle 4 10 2 6 11 3 2 Flat Periwinkle 4 2 4 3 6 4 Limpet 8 22 4 10 12 9 22 4 5 10 5 10

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work