• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating Stopping Distances

Extracts from this document...


Investigating Stopping Distances I am investigating the stopping distance of a car rolled down a ramp. The factors affecting stopping distances are; * The mass of the car will affect the stopping distance of the car due to the effects of friction that will increase as the mass of the car increases. * Speed of the toy car affects the stopping distance. * Air resistance will affect the stopping distance. * The surface on which the car is to stop on will effect the stopping distance * Also all other frictional forces will affect the car like the surface area of the tyres on the car. The friction between the axle and the chassis. * Gravity, although I will be unable to vary this in my investigation, it would affect the friction between the car and the road. * I will vary the height of the ramp using the blocks, which in turn will vary the speed of the car. I will measure d that will be equal and kept constant at 100mm. Therefore to find the speed of the car I will use the formula: Speed = Distance (d) of card / time on light gate Then I will measure the stopping distance from the base of the ramp. I will repeat the readings 3 times and find the average stopping distance over 8 different speeds. ...read more.


The car would have a piece of card to attach it so the light gate would be able to sense this change. The speed could be changed by the height of the ramp. The measurements will be speed in m/s whilst the distance was in cm. The preliminary results were a basis of the range I was going to use. We decided from this we would use the smallest height of 10cm, 15cm, 20cm, 25cm, 30cm, 35cm, 40cm and to the largest height of 45cm. We will repeat each height 3 times and will have two solutions speed - required from the Psion and distance - measured from the ruler as soon as it left the base. Results Height (cm) Distance (cm) Speed (m/s) 1 2 3 Av 1 2 3 Av Av^2 10 16.7 17 16.8 16.8 0.415 0.428 0.424 0.42 0.178 15 30.5 34.5 33.3 32.8 0.572 0.598 0.589 0.59 0.344 20 42.5 46 47 45.2 0.66 0.702 0.675 0.68 0.461 25 56.5 60.5 59.5 58.8 0.757 0.785 0.766 0.77 0.592 30 64 67.5 69 66.8 0.803 0.816 0.803 0.81 0.652 35 71.5 74.5 73.5 73.2 0.849 0.857 0.857 0.85 0.730 40 84 85.5 85.5 85.0 0.873 0.868 0.865 0.87 0.755 45 101.5 103 104.5 103.0 0.911 0.962 0.982 0.95 0.906 Conclusion From the results that I have got I have found my predictions to be quite good, as the lines on the graphs are similar to what I predicted. ...read more.


Another part of the method that needs to be improved is the act of measuring the stopped distance of the car. This also was done by hand which could cause significant error because of the inaccuracies involved with looking down at the ruler and reading off a value. To improve the point made about releasing the car I would set up some sort of clamp with a solenoid to release the car electronically therefore eliminating any human error. Also stopping distance could be measured electronically by using several hundred tiny lasers or light gates set up in millimetre intervals, just like a ruler along the area where the car would run. Or there could be tiny magnets set up along the ruler and a reed switch attached to the side of the car and as it passed along side the ruler depending on how many times the reed switch was broken it would calculate a distance. Then a measurement could be digitally read of a display, which would eliminate any human error in looking at a ruler. But these ideas are far too unpractical to do at school and would be very time consuming to set-up. Also to improve on the height adjustment of the ramp could be done using pneumatic pistons to lift the ramp up and down to the exact height wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Physics Investigation: The effect of speed on braking distance

    4 star(s)

    (depends on how far the stopping distance is) * Carpet (depends on results of Preliminary) * Ball (also depends on results of Preliminary) Here is a diagram of how it should look: Step-by-step Method 1. Connect the clamp to the clamp-stand.

  2. Investigation is to see how changing the height of a ramp affects the stopping ...

    VARIABLES NON - VARIABLES HEIGHT OF RAMP SURFACE OF RAMP GRAVITY TYPE OF CAR MASS OF CAR STARTING POINT ONRAMP FACTORS WHICH MAY AFFECT STOPPING DISTANCE There are many factors, which affect the stopping distance of a toy car. There are many factors; here are a few of them: >

  1. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The smooth curve of the theoretical results ignores the factors like friction, air resistance and the irregular and uneven surface of the runway. The results of my experiment support my prediction that the speed of a freewheeling trolley increases as the height of the ram is increased and the increase is not linear.

  2. Investigating the relationship between the speed of a model car and its stopping distance.

    However this means that you have to increase the distance by a factor of four aswell. This means if you travel twice as fast as before then the distance must also increase by a factor of four to dissipate the extra Kinetic Energy that is being exerted by the model car.

  1. An investigation into factors that effect the braking distance of a trolley

    The results also undoubtedly showed a relationship between the increase in ramp and the increase in braking distance of the trolley. There were no strange results (anomalies) within my results table and I think that this was because of the extreme caution and care that I put into making sure that the experiment was set up correctly with careful measuring.

  2. Stopping Distances

    The longer the car goes down the ramp then it will accelerate for a longer period of time. This gives the car more kinetic energy and will need a higher counter force to stop it, the floor will be constant therefore the toy car will travel for longer and further.

  1. Trolley Speed

    Also my prediction for potential energy; as the height is doubled the potential energy is also doubled was also correct. Height of ramp 16cm 16cm the potential energy was 1.28 J Height of ramp 32cm 32cm the potential energy was 2.56 J If you divide 16cm by 32 cm the answer is 2.

  2. Approximate Stopping Distances

    Braking distance is not directly proportional to speed whereas the thinking distance is. E.g. when the speed of the vehicle is 30 mph the braking distance is 45 ft whereas when the speed of the vehicle is 60 mph the braking distance massively increases to 180 ft which shows that the rate of change is not consistent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work