• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24

Investigating the effects of changing the concentration of different solutions on the refractive index and the conductivity

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics Investigation --- Investigating the effects of changing the concentration of different solutions on the refractive index and the conductivity Content Aim P.2 Summary P.2 Risk assessment P.2 Information on errors / uncertainties P.2 Background P.3-7 Refractive index P.3-7 Diary P.7-13 Day 1 P.7 Day 2 P.7 Day 3 P.8 Day 4 P.9-10 Day 5 P.10-11 Day 6 P.11-12 Day 7 P.12 Day 8 P.12-13 Analysis P.13 Background P.14-15 Conductance P.15 Dairy P.15-16 Day 9 P.15 Day 10 P.16 Analysis P.16 Evaluation P.17 Conclusion P.17 Bibliography P.18 Appendix P.19-24 1 P.19 2 P.20 3 P.21 4 P.22 5 P.23 6 P.24 Aim The main aim of this investigation is to find out how some of the properties of solutions change when their concentration is altered. Summary When I was told that we were going to do this practical investigation, I struggled for a while not knowing what to do. But as I searching more and reading more about A Level experiments, they conjured up lots of different ideas in my head. When it came to the time for our plan, I decided to investigate the effect of changing the concentration of different solutions on the refractive index. At the beginning, I had some troubles in choosing suitable equipment. When I tried out some trials, they seemed alright. However due to a few problems arose, I had to change my idea slightly. So instead, I investigated the effect of changing the concentration of different solutions on the conductance of the solutions. Risk Assessment I have considered the risk that might occur during the investigation before I actually start my investigation. As I am going to deal with mainly salt and sugar, these substances and the solutions formed are neither irritant nor corrosive nor carcinogenic etc. Besides, most equipment that I am going to use is normal laboratory equipment like beaker, glass rod, watch glass ... ...read more.

Middle

Volume of water Upper boundary of the maximum moles of salt to be put in = 0.5346 mol 100 cm-3 ? (50 � 1) cm3 = (0.2673 � 0.0053) mol Lower boundary of the maximum moles of salt to be put in = 0.5288 mol 100cm-3 ? (50 � 1) cm3 = (0.2644 � 0.0053) mol Maximum mass of salt to be put in = Maximum moles of salt ? RMM of salt Upper limit of maximum mass of salt to be put in = (0.2673 � 0.0053) mol ? 58.4 g mol-1 = (15.6103 � 0.3095) g Lower limit of maximum mass of salt to be put in = (0.2644 � 0.0053) mol ? 58.4 mol-1 = (15.4410 � 0.3095) g So by doing all the calculations above, I found the maximum mass of salt to be dissolved in 200 cm3 of water is (62.10 � 0.03) g. And by using equations like: Moles = Mass / Relative molecular mass Concentration = Moles / Volume I found the saturation of salt solution to be 0.5317 � 0.0029 moles per 100 cm3. Day 5 As I have decided to use 50 cm3 of water each time, after knowing that the saturation of salt solution, I worked out the amount of salt can be dissolved in 50 cm3 with the upper limit to be (15.6103 � 0.3122) g and the lower limit to be (15.4410 � 0.3088) g. So I tried to added different mass of salt into 50 cm3 within 15 g and allowed all the salt to dissolve with the help of a glass rod. Once all the solutions had been prepared, I actually carried what I wanted to find, i.e. the refractive of these solutions using the same method as I used in day 3 for water. The table of results of (r1-r3) & (r1-r2) values collected from those salt solutions are recorded in Appendix 1. ...read more.

Conclusion

2) equipment not available --- this is a really big limitation to me as the text book suggests to use travelling microscope to find the refractive index. However, due to the travelling microscope having a scale the wrong way round, I have had to use binocular microscope. And it is because of this binocular microscope which gave me the values of R1 - R2 equalling to 0, the refractive index couldn't be found. 3) temperature --- temperature could be another factor that have affected the results obtained, as a higher temperature in some solutions would have caused more salt or sugar to be dissolved than in room temperature. I have tried to eliminate this error by carrying out all my experiments in the same laboratory, however, the temperature in the same laboratory can still differ from day to day even the difference shouldn't be much. Conclusion To conclude, I wouldn't say that I have actually proved anything or even I have deduced a law simply because what I found in both parts of my investigation, refractive index and conductance, don't seem to match the theory and was totally unexpected. So far, I found out that for salt solution at a magnification of 28, as its concentration increases, the density of the solution is increasing; the angle of refraction of light ray bends more towards the normal, which gives a bigger refractive index. However, for sugar, there isn't a pattern for its refractive index as its concentration is increased. Besides, as the magnification is adjusted to 56, the refractive index for both salt and sugar solution at any concentration is nothing. About the effect of varying the concentration on the conductance, sometimes increases the concentration results in having more freely charged ions to move towards electrodes giving a higher conductance and sometimes an increase in concentration results in reducing the ability for these ions to move around. And further more, even I have in fact discovered anything new or anything beyond the theory or anything that the theory couldn't explain, without carrying out lots and lots of repeats, everything is still a mystery. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Formula of a hydrated salt

    4 star(s)

    This may have again affected the mass reading and the overall calculations, resulting in inaccurate results. To improve the experiment and the accuracy of results I could firstly try finding brand new clean crucibles or clean the crucibles for longer until all other substances are removed.

  2. Determine Solubility of KClO3 Salt.

    Data and Result: Temperature (oC) 40 50 60 80 Crucible (g) 42.73 39.02 43.26 46.17 Mass obtained, 2nd heating (g) 43.09 39.50 44.13 47.67 Mass obtained, 1st heating (g) 43.09 39.50 44.13 47.67 Constant actual salt (g) 0.36 0.48 0.87 1.50 Calculation and Analysis: The Solubility of KClO3 salt in 40 oC = 0.36g/5mL To

  1. Investigating the effects of varying pH levels on the germination of cress seeds

    13 51.6 28 51.6 33 51.6 46 51.6 41 51.6 100 51.6 100 51.6 Null hypothesis: success of seed germination is not dependent on pH level .?. the same number of seeds should germinate in each sample. I tested this null hypothesis by means of a ?� for the results obtained from day 1.

  2. An experiment to see how much sugar can be dissolved in different volumes of ...

    the required volume of water then I will repeat the experiment by adding the sugar and timing its time to dissolve until the sugar stops dissolving. I will repeat the experiment 6 times in total, each time I will only change the volume of water and noting when the sugar stops dissolving in the water.

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    are similar but not close enough to suggest that they are very accurate results. Experiment Six - How much Iron (II) can be extracted from 20 grams of Spinach Oleracea when boiled in Sulphuric Acid (aq) Experiment A 5Fe2+ + 5C2O42- + 3MnO4 + 24H+ 5Fe3+ + 10CO2 + 3Mn2+

  2. Application of Hess's Law

    of HCl is equivalent to 1 gram of H2O because I must use the specific heat of water, which is the amount of energy required to raise one gram of water by one degree Celsius (4.18 Joules) in the formula: Enthalpy change = mass or volume of a substance x

  1. To see how solubility of sugar dissolved in water is affected by temperature

    This occurs when the solution contains as much of the dissolved substance as possible at a particular temperature. When this procedure takes place, we are able to know the saturation point, (how much of the substance has dissolved). Prediction - I predict that the hotter the water is, the more sugar will dissolve.

  2. Collision Theory

    To overcome this problem I made sure to look from directly above each time. Volumes of substances: If differing volumes are used it will give a poor set of results as it will not show us the effect concentration has on rate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work