• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the effects of surface area on the rate of enzyme reactions.

Extracts from this document...


AS Biology Coursework assignment Investigating the effects of surface area on the rate of enzyme reactions By Scott Humm Introduction Enzymes basically are biological catalysts. What this means is they have the ability to speed up reactions without actually being used up themselves. Enzymes are globular proteins and they have a three-dimensional shape, which is very precise and never varies between two examples of the same protein. The active site for all molecules of the same enzyme will be made up of the same arrangement of amino acids. This exact shape and arrangement of amino acids enables the enzymes to be highly specific and this defines which substrate they bind to in the active site. Because they are so specific, enzymes are thought to catalyse substrate into two different products by the "Lock and Key hypothesis". Diagram taken from http://schools.moe.edu.sg/chijsjc/Biology/Enzyme/enzyme.htm This diagram shows how enzymes catalyse the breakdown of a substrate molecule into two products. The only way that another molecule can bind with an enzyme's active site is if it is an inhibitor. Inhibitors are molecules that can bind with the active site briefly causing competition between itself and any substrate molecules. When there is a very high concentration of inhibitors, substrate molecules do not bind with active sites as easily because there are less of them. This slows down the reaction, and is very useful if someone has drunken anti-freeze. Another type of inhibitors is non-competitive irreversible inhibitors. They remain in the active site permanently, and this means there is no competition at all. This is how the antibiotic Penicillin works. A different kind of inhibitor binds elsewhere on the enzyme, rather than in the active site. ...read more.


While doing the experiment, I realized quite a few flaws. Firstly, the gas syringe barely moved when the gas was being produced. This may have been due to friction in the syringe, and because of this problem I will change the experiment. The other problem was that when I pushed the bung in the conical flask, the gas inside the conical flask was forced into the syringe, meaning that there would be less gas evolved than shown on the syringe. Method Because of the problems involved in using the gas syringe, I have decided to use this equipment instead: Other equipment used not in diagram: 25cm3 measuring cylinder, razor blade, wooden tile, ruler, #5 cork borer, and thermometer. * Pour water into the trough, and into the graduated burette from the tap. * Put the burette in the trough of water so that no gas enters it. Make sure the delivery tube is not in the burette at this point. * Accurately measure out 25cm� of 20Vol. Hydrogen Peroxide making sure there are no bubbles in it. * Pour this hydrogen peroxide in the conical flask taking care not to spill any. * Using a number 5 cork borer, get a tube of potato. With the razor, cut the potato to exactly to 5cm, and make sure that the ends are cut perpendicular to the side of the potato. * Drop the potato into the hydrogen peroxide and quickly push the bung into the conical flask. * Pump the bung for exactly 20 seconds removing all the gas from inside the conical flask, all the while making sure that the delivery tube isn't inside the graduated burette. ...read more.


This way, I may get more accurate results because using the initial rate of reaction is the best indication of the actual rate of reaction. I only took three readings each of five different surface areas. If I were to redo the experiment, I would do more surface areas, and more repeat readings. The reason for this is that if you take more readings, then you are more likely to get a far more accurate set of results. Of the three repeat readings I did for each surface area, my results were reasonably similar. The relatively low numbers from Standard Deviation show this. (From my results table.) This means that my results are quite reliable. To prove my prediction (that after a certain point, an increase in surface area does not affect the rate of reaction) I could use less substrate. The reason for this is that once all the substrate is being used up, then there are free active sites doing nothing. The less substrate there is, the quicker this point will come, and the graph should level off. I would redo the experiment using 15cm3 of hydrogen peroxide rather than 25cm3. I would also take more readings just to be sure; I would take readings of the 5cm piece of potato being cut into 25 pieces, and 30 pieces. With the extra results and lower substrate concentration, the graph is almost certainly going to level off, and this will be clearly visible too. Safety: At all times, gloves and goggles were worn because hydrogen peroxide is a very dangerous chemical. If it is gotten on your skin or in your eyes, it is very irritating, and may burn. Care was also taken to make sure that the razor blades were used safely and correctly. As an extra precaution, lab coats could have been worn, but this is not particularly necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Life Processes & Cells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well written report that has a good structure and includes a lot of detail.
1. The introduction is strong and includes relevant information. The information should be referenced though.
2. The variables section is very well written and concise.
3. All of the equipment uses should be listed.
4. The conclusion is too brief and does not use the data to back up the pattern.
5. The evaluation is good but could be improved by referring back to the data more, in particularly the standard deviation.
****(4 stars)

Marked by teacher Luke Smithen 08/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Life Processes & Cells essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Effects of Surface Area on Catalase Activity in Potato.

    5 star(s)

    Many biological reactions produce hydrogen peroxide; hydrogen peroxide is very harmful to cells. The cells counter the hydrogen peroxide by using an enzyme called Catalase which decomposes the hydrogen peroxide into much safer products, Catalase possesses an active site with a shape that fits the shape of the hydrogen peroxide

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Biology Coursework - Osmosis

    5 star(s)

    amount of solution that produces the best results, or the effect of temperature on the experiment. Experiment: Equipment The equipment needed for my experiment will be as follows: * Several Boiling Tubes * Test Tube Rack * Distilled Water * Sucrose Solutions of varying concentration: * 0.25M * 0.5M *

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigating Enzymes and the effects of different variables such as temperature on how they ...

    4 star(s)

    Also they come in very small pieces of equal size. This makes it easy to measure the mass accurately. This also makes sure the surface area is the same. The variables we will have in the real experiment will stay the same.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Science Coursework: Investigating Osmosis in potato tissue

    4 star(s)

    2.04 2.5 2.18 2.2 106 88 1% salt 1.89 2.5 1.87 2.1 99 84 2.5% salt 2.05 2.5 1.60 2.1 78 84 5% salt 1.97 2.5 1.51 2.00 77 80 As you can see from our experiment it almost proves my prediction that the higher the concentration in the beaker

  1. Marked by a teacher

    BiologY Lab report

    3 star(s)

    Observation Type of carbohydrate Temperature of the solution No of bubbles formed LACTOSE 400 c 2 MALTOSE 400 c Nil SUCROSE 400 c 63 STARCH 400 c 2 GLUCOSE 400 c 72 NOTE: Quantity of yeast taken was 3cm3 for each carbohydrate and the volume of carbohydrate taken was 12cm3.

  2. Investigating the effect of changing the concentration of an acid on the rate of ...

    * I will keep the size (and hence surface area) of the agar section constant by using the same Petri dish (my designated Petri dish), and using the same straw to collect it each time. * I will use the same amount of acid (5cm3), and it must be an excess of acid, so the reaction will definitely be completed.

  1. What is the difference in Vitamin C content between orange juice and orange squash?

    would fit in well, which it did, as the results came out as I expected, leaving the average to be very fitting. I used the same amount of each liquid for every test in order for it to be a fair one, and for the experiment to be as successful

  2. To investigate the factors that effect osmosis in living tissue.

    This is most likely to be due to inadequacies in taking the initial mass and volume measurements. From the trend-line it appears as though the water potential of the potato is approximately equal to the water potential of the 0.36 molar solution. Thus: hypotonic solution ? 0.36 ? hypertonic solution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work