• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Investigating the speed at which a ball bounces off a surface

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigating the speed at which a ball bounces off a surface

Plan

Introduction

I intend on investigating the speed at which a ball rebounds of a given surface. I will try and find a relationship between the speed it hits the surface and the speed it comes off the surface.

Background Information

The principle of conservation of energy states “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another.”1 This is the reason that the ball does not rebound off the block at the same speed that it hits it at. As some of the energy has been converted into a different form when it hits the block.

Prediction

I predict that as the velocity of the ball approaching the surface increases then the speed at which it rebounds off it also increases proportionally. So if I double the speed of Va (velocity of approach) then the speed at which it rebounds is also doubled. image00.png

e.g.  Va    Vr. This means that the graph of my results should produce a straight-line graph as they are proportional (as shown in the diagram). This also means that the wooden block takes the same proportion of energy every time the ball hits the block

The reason why I think that the rebound speed will be slower than the approaching speed is that some of the kinetic energy from the moving ball is converted to the form of heat and sound when it hits the block. The kinetic energy of the ball has not been destroyed only changed its form, as quoted in my background information.

If an object of mass ‘m’ moves at speed ‘v’.

...read more.

Middle

        The closer the light gate is to the block then the more immediate the readings are, as they are taken just before it hits and just after. Because of this I’m going to position the light gate 2.5cm from the block. This is close enough to ensure reliable results, and far away enough so that I get two readings, as the ball diameter is 2cm.

The suitable point from the block I found to be about 25cm. Anything less than this was difficult to collect results for, as when the ball was dropped from 40cm I had to press both buttons on the stop-clock very quickly in succession as it was going so fast. This means that the closer the point is to the block the more inaccurate it is, but when it’s far away then the ball is unable to rebound back up to the point. When I made the point 40cm away from the block, I found it very easy to use the stop clock at all speeds but was unable to get results below 10cm, as the ball did not rebound far enough. I found that a good balance at which I could get reliable results with the stop-clock as well as use all heights was 25cm away from the block.

For my experiment I’m going to take my results from the computer to 3 decimal places and 2 decimal places when using the stop-clock.

...read more.

Conclusion

        The percentage of energy losses to the block for the two methods are quite different to each other, this is due to the experiments themselves being more or less accurate then each other. As a whole I think that the percentage of energy lost in method B is more accurate than method A as the points fit on the line of best fit much better and so the gradient of the line is more accurate.

The reason that I only collected data for heights of 28, 32, 36 and 40cm in method B and not 30, 34, 38cm is that the ball continually bounced out when it hit the block at these heights. When dropping the ball at anything above 24cm I found that it required numerous repeats to ensure that I got 2 results, as the ball refused to stay in the track. However after about 4 tries for each height I finally got a reliable result.

        If I were to repeat the investigation I would take more results for each height, and also drop the ball from more heights. For example I would take 3 readings for each height as well as increase the heights by 1cm instead of 2cm. For method A I would also use a more accurate stopclock, one with 3 decimal places instead of 2. As well as have somebody with amazing reflexes using it, so that the results are even more reliable than if I were to do it.

        With these more accurate results it would also mean that my conclusion is more reliable.

Bibliography

http://learntech.uwe.ac.uk/radiography/RScience/sciencestudypack/energy1.htm

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Bouncing Ball Experiment

    Then when dropping the ball again eye level will be kept level with the blue tack thus avoiding parallax errors. The weight and material of the ball will be kept the same throughout the experiment by using the same ball.

  2. Trolley Speed

    were printed there by a vibrating metal bar running on an electric current, which hits a piece of carbon paper 50 times every second. The analysis of a ticker tape diagram will also reveal if the object is moving with a constant velocity or accelerating.

  1. Investigate and measure the speed of a ball rolling down a ramp.

    = Distance Traveled (m) X Mean Time Taken (S) Secondly I predict that as the Gravitational potential energy increases, the kinetic energy also increases proportionally Thirdly I predict that as the height of the ramp increases the G.P.E also increases proportionally Fourthly I predict that as the speed of the ball (squared)

  2. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    at which height the ball would give a large bounce back height and produce the fewest inaccuracies. In order to do this, a range of heights were taken from 40cm to 100cm and bounce tests were carried out 5 times each for each individual height.

  1. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The contact area between the trolley and runway as well as the trolley and ramp- the larger the contact area, the greater the amount of friction, which will lead to the trolley moving slower. 7. Air resistance - the faster the trolley is moving, the greater the amount of

  2. This investigation is associated with the bounce of a squash ball. I will be ...

    Both potential and kinetic energy have units of Joules (J). As the ball falls through the air, the Law of Conservation of Energy is in effect and states that energy is neither gained nor lost, only transferred from one form to another.

  1. This investigation will be looking at what factors affect the performance of a squash ...

    the ball is less - the air molecules have less energy, move slower and collide less frequently resulting in the ball deforming (flattening) more as it hits the grounds and resulting in greater loss of heat and sound energy. This means the ball has less energy to use during motion

  2. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    I also wanted a simple ball that would bounce enough times to give me good readings, and won't give off too much energy as sound or kinetic, providing enough P.E for it to bounce back again. I therefore used a bouncy ball and rubber ball, as I felt I didn't need any more than 5 sound readings.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work