• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7

# Investigation into the Strength of an Electromagnet

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

George Maund

Investigation into the Strength of an Electromagnet

Planning Experimental Procedure

When electric current is passed through a wire a magnetic field is created. If you wind the wire around an iron core, then you have an electromagnet. They have North and South poles just like normal magnets, but it does have some differences – if you switch off the current, the magnetic field is lost, and the strength of the magnetic field can be altered by either changing the number of coils around the core, or by changing the current.

I intend to measure the strength of an electromagnet – a magnet consisting of an iron core with plastic-coated wire rapped around. When current is applied through the wire, the iron core becomes magnetic – and I intend to test the effect of varying the current. The factors that will have an affect on the quantity I’m investigating include room temperature, material of core, number of coils around the core – I intend to keep all of these constant. The factor I intend to vary in my investigation (independent variable) will be current – the current flowing through the coils of the electromagnet. I have chosen this as I think it will be the easiest to investigate and carry out. The other variables (number of coils) will be kept constant so as to give valuable and worthwhile results.

Middle

0.53

2.0

0.94

0.96

0.99

0.95

0.98

0.97

2.5

1.65

1.64

1.65

1.65

1.66

1.65

3.0

2.00

1.80

1.50

2.00

1.90

1.84

3.5

2.20

2.30

2.30

2.20

2.40

2.28

4.0

2.60

2.50

2.90

2.90

2.80

2.74

4.5

3.00

2.90

3.00

2.80

2.90

2.92

5.0

3.10

3.00

2.90

3.10

3.00

3.02

## Conclusion

My results clearly show an S curve – although different to my predicted pattern, is still a pattern. There is some distinct proportionality between Current and Force in the middle section ‘B’ because equal changes in Current cause equal changes in the Force required to pull the piece of metal away from the electromagnet. Section ‘A’ shows that the electromagnet takes time to get started before it reaches the start of section ‘B’ (1.5A). Section ‘C’ is where the graph levels off, where the electromagnet reaches maximum strength – there are no domains left to be turned.

Section ‘A’ shows the domains taking time to be turned at first, but once they reach ‘B’ they are more easily turned. Once they get past 4.5A there are barely any domains left. Section ‘A’ is the only part I did not foresee in my prediction.

## Scientific Explanation

I put my conclusion down to the Domain Theory, this time different to my initial prediction as I expand on it to explain section ‘A’ on my graph.

To begin with it is quite difficult for the magnetic field to turn the first few domains. After this it is easier for the domains to be turned because the more domains that are turned, the easier it is for others to be turned.

Conclusion

I say generally I mean all except for the readings of 2.5A that read as follows:
 2.5 1.65 1.64 1.65 1.65 1.66 1.65

These measurements should have fallen in line with the curve of the graph, meaning they should have read at around 1.40N each time to give an average of approximately 1.40 Newtons. They should have looked something like this:

 2.5 1.39 1.4 1.4 1.41 1.4 1.4

Compared to the rest of the results here, they fit in much better. They are highlighted in bold to show up easier.

 Current Force (N) Average (A) 1 2 3 4 5 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 1.0 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.17 1.5 0.50 0.55 0.50 0.55 0.55 0.53 2.0 0.94 0.96 0.99 0.95 0.98 0.97 2.5 1.39 1.40 1.40 1.41 1.40 1.40 3.0 2.00 1.80 1.50 2.00 1.90 1.84 3.5 2.20 2.30 2.30 2.20 2.40 2.28 4.0 2.60 2.50 2.90 2.90 2.80 2.74 4.5 3.00 2.90 3.00 2.80 2.90 2.92 5.0 3.10 3.00 2.90 3.10 3.00 3.02

I can’t blame the experimental procedure for the flawed results at 2.5A. However, I can hope to improve the method by suggesting a change. This would be that the electromagnet’s temperature be controlled by using a Bunsen burner, and to check that the temperature does not fluctuate at all. I would make another change to the method: to exchange the makeshift electromagnet for a properly built set, which would be more reliable than the one I used. This would eliminate the chance of the distance between coils, and the distance between the core and the coils changing. I think the degree of accuracy I used was fine, and the amount of readings was ideal, as the graph showed even more aspects to the line (or curve) than I had anticipated.

In future I would recommend doing an investigation into the resistance of a copper wire, as I predict this would give similar style results to an investigation into an electromagnet.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Waves section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Waves essays

1. ## To investigate how the strength of an electromagnet change as you varies the number ...

is more force is being pulled, therefore the weight of the conductor becomes lighter. There are also some factors that can affect the result, which is the way we wrapped the coils on the electromagnet. This is because if we wrap the coils closer together the effect of this is

2. ## The aim of my experiment is to see what factors affect electromagnetism the most ...

middle through a solenoid and as a result so will the magnetism. From this I can say that the coil wraps will have to be equally distanced apart so that there will be no concentration of magnetism in the iron nail (if any two coil wraps are nearer each other

1. ## Physics Case Study - Do Sunbeds Cause Skin Cancer?

Another article, published in the New Scientist magazine on the 18th May 2008, focuses on two studies, which found similar links to genes. This time independent teams in Australia and Iceland have pinpointed the same gene as increasing the risk "two mutations in the gene ASIP doubled the chances of

2. ## An Investigation to Determine the Effect of the Number of Turns around the Core ...

1 power pack 2 power pack cables 2 crocodile clips 1 Petri dish Paperclips (at least 200) 1 paper cup Diagram Method Firstly the iron nail was taken and wrapped with twenty turns of thin insulated wire, each end of which was attached to a power pack via crocodile clips.

1. ## What factors affect the strength of electromagnetism?

The preliminary experiments helped me a lot because I now know what settings I need to use and how many readings I can use. Plan Materials * Constantan wire (insulated) for solenoid * Iron Rod Apparatus * Power pack * Connecting leads * Variable resistor * Ammeter * Wooden clamp

2. ## Physics investigation- Strength of Electromagnet

To vary the current will keep the voltage output from the power pack at 13 volts and then using a variable resistor to adjust the current. To measure the current we will use an ammeter. The electromagnet will be 5mm from the scales and magnet as we found in the

1. ## What factors affect the strength of an electromagnet?

power supply switch of by itself and we had to reset it. As I stated before that the force can be attractive or repulsive in this case the force was attracted. For our investigation we didn't use iron filings but we used a soft iron which was the nail, and

2. ## Light is so common that we often take it for granted.

When the atoms de-excite, they emit photons. The sun shines because nuclear reactions between hydrogen atoms within its core produce a tremendous amount of energy. Photons and other kinds of particles carry the energy to the sun's surface. At the surface, these particles excite atoms that then de-excite by emitting light.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to