• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigation of Energy Changes in a Displacement Reaction.

Extracts from this document...


January 2002 Michael Lavery U5W Chemistry Coursework - Investigation of Energy Changes in a Displacement Reaction. Plan Introduction When a metal is added to a solution of another salt metal the reaction between the two brings about an exothermic reaction. In this investigation I aim to discover, as the mass of zinc increases, when energy given out stops rising i.e. how much zinc can react with 50cm3 of 0.5M Copper Sulphate. The reaction is exothermic because energy given out when bonds are made is greater than the energy taken in to break bonds. Zinc + Copper Sulphate ? Zinc Sulphate + Copper ? ? (metal) (metal salt) Zn (s) + CuSO4 (aq) ? ZnSO4 (aq) + Cu (s) Variables The only variable I will alter throughout the experiment is the mass of zinc used; altering only one variable keeps the test fair. I will keep the following variables constant: Volume of copper sulphate used (50cm3) and the concentration of copper sulphate (0.5M) Method Apparatus * Large glass beaker * Polystyrene cup * Thermometer * Measuring Cylinder * Copper sulphate (0.5M) * Zinc (powder) * Small glass beaker * Mass balance * Spatula Diagram 1. Using the measuring cylinder measure out 50cm3 of copper sulphate and pour this into the polystyrene cup which is in the glass beaker (as shown in the diagram). ...read more.


energy given out must occur when the copper sulphate is reacted with 0.025 moles of zinc, the following graph shows how the energy released in the reaction stops increasing when 0.025 moles of zinc has been added even though the amount of zinc added continues to rise. To find the mass of zinc that produces the largest amount of energy released I must calculate what mass of zinc contains 0.025 moles. Relative atomic mass of zinc ? Mass of 0.025 moles of zinc = 0.025 x 65 = 1.625g So maximum energy will be given out when 1.625 g of zinc is added to 50cm3 of 0.5M copper sulphate. When plotting a graph of mass of zinc against energy given out I can use the following equation: Energy given out = m x s x temperature rise ? ? Mass of solution Specific heat capacity (4.2) Results Mass of zinc (g) Initial temperature (?c) Final temperature (?c) Temperature rise (?c) Average Temperature rise (?c) Energy given out (joules) 0.5 20 27 7 7 1470 19.5 26.5 7 1.0 19.5 34.5 15 15 3150 19 34 15 1.5 20 42 22 22.5 4672.5 19 41.5 22.5 2.0 16 43 27 27.25 5722.5 16.5 44 27.5 2.5 15.5 44.5 29 29 6090 16 45 29 3.0 15.5 45 29.5 29.25 6142.5 16 45 29 3.5 17.5 47 29.5 29.5 6195 18 47.5 29.5 4.0 18 47 29 ...read more.


* I could have improved the measurements of my copper sulphate by using either a pipette or a burette, these pieces of equipment are more complicated but much more accurate. * If I had used a mass balance which read to three decimal places my measurements of zinc, especially the low ones, will have been much more accurate. * A lid on the polystyrene cup would have stopped so much heat escaping but stirring during the reaction would have been a problem. * During the experiment I only but a glass beaker around the cup to stop heat escaping, accuracy would have increased if more lagging was included. * More repetition of the experiment would improve accuracy because averages would be more reliable, repetition would also make anomalous points on the graph less likely. * More masses of zinc would improve my graph, if I had increased the amount of zinc by 0.25g instead of 0.5g the results may have related to my prediction and theory better. * Using different concentrations of copper sulphate as well as masses of zinc would have been time-consuming but would have produced better results. * Other types of displacement reactions to compare this with would help to prove my prediction; I could use different metals and different metal salts. * I could use a temperature probe connected to a computer with a magnetic stirrer in the solution, this would greatly improve accuracy, the diagram below shows how such an experiment would be set up. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classifying Materials section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classifying Materials essays

  1. Rate of reaction of hydrochloric acid on magnesium.

    There were downsides to this experiment, which had not been as precise as the other factors with in the whole experiment this was the excess water remaining in the conical flask. This had occurred because I only had one conical flaskto carry out the entire experiment with and the opening

  2. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Temperature Change Between Zinc and Copper Sulphate

    + (1 x 32) + (4 x 16) = 64 + 32 + 64 = 160g The concentration of copper sulphate solution is therefore 0.16 mol/litres because 160 grams of copper sulphate is dissolved in 1000 cm3 of water. Similarly, 0.5 mol/litres can be worked out by calculating half a mole of copper sulphate, i.e.

  1. The rates of reaction between CaCO3 and HCL

    as it would have been if smaller masses had of been used. The volume of HCl was measured in a measuring cylinder that measured to 1ml this was ample enough to gather the data and as 20ml was chosen this was the only cylinder that measured this the cylinders that

  2. An Investigation Into How the Mass of Zinc Effects the Heat Change In the ...

    10�C, then I would expect to see that the temperature change to be 20�C, for a mass of 0.4g of zinc and 25cm� of copper sulphate. Due to my hypothesis, my predicted graph looks like this: Heat Change (�C) Mass of zinc (g)

  1. Affect of concentration on reaction

    Dilute 10cm3 of 2.0M HCl with 40cm3 of water to create 0.4M HCl. Results 3 50cm3 0.4M HCl Starting Mass 5.00g CaCO3 (Powdered) Time (seconds) Mass (grams) Mass Loss (grams) 0 5.00 0.00 5 4.89 0.11 10 4.84 0.16 15 4.82 0.18 20 4.80 0.20 25 4.79 0.21 30 4.78

  2. The role of mass customization and postponement in global logistics

    Sustainability of Mass Customisation as a Competitive Strategy Mass Customisation has become one of the important modes of facing competition thorough adding value to the product offerings. Mass Customisation enables not only value addition thorough variety but also make the consumers realise how important they are in determining the product they require.

  1. Investigate a factor that effects the change in temperature between iron and copper sulphate.

    We can find out how much iron will be needed to react with all the copper in the solution with molar equations: Balanced equation: Fe + CuSO4 5H2O FeSO4 + Cu ( 1 molar copper sulphate solution) Relative 56 + 64+32 +(16 x 4) + 10 + (5 x 16)

  2. Investigating the energy change when zinc reacts with copper(II) sulphate.

    The mass of zinc that I will be taking readings from are: 0.1g, 0.2g, 0.3g, 0.4g and 0.5g. For accurate results, I will be taking three repeats for each mass. The factor that I will be keeping constant is the volume of copper sulphate which will be 50cm cubed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work