• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

Is the preferred habitat of moss on the North side of a Yew Tree or the North side of an Oak Tree?

Extracts from this document...


Richard Tandy A2 Biology - Ecology coursework Is the preferred habitat of moss on the North side of a Yew Tree or the North side of an Oak Tree? Plan of investigation For this project I aim to investigate if moss coverage has a preferred habitat on the North side of a Yew tree (a coniferous variety) or the North side of an Oak Tree (a deciduous variety). I will undertake this by means of fieldwork in a woodland area and the sampling and collection of data in the natural habitat of the forest in which I will visit. Appropriate Equipment to be used For the investigation I will need: * A compass * A quadrat (approximately 10cm � 10cm) * A meter ruler * A notepad to record results on to * A paper bag to protect notepad from the rain * A pen * String measured at approximately 1.5 meters long * Appropriate clothing such as waterproofs and walking boots On a separate A4 page is a drawing of the table I will use to record my results, showing the readings I am planning to take. The procedures selected and anticipated methods of collecting data. I will need to control various techniques and methods of working in order to standardise my investigation. I will standardise the actual sample taking. I will place the meter ruler against the trunk and place the quadrat at a height of one meter, with the bottom left hand corner of the quadrat touching the top right hand corner of the ruler. I will count the amount of squares placed over moss to derive a percentage. I will do this twice. Using the compass I will ensure the moss I am sampling is on the north face of the tree, as I specified in my aim. Using the string I measured, I will standardise the circumference of the trees, selecting trees only with a circumference of around 1.5 meters long. ...read more.


Analysing Evidence and Drawing Conclusions The main trend and outcomes of the results The main outcome of my investigation illustrated by the results table shows clearly there is much greater percentage moss coverage on the Oak trees than the Yew trees. Many Yew trees in fact have 0% coverage and the highest is 20%, compared with a highest of 100% on Oak. Therefore, not only does moss grow more on Oak trees, the outcome is that moss growth is exponential on Oak trees compared with Yew trees. Using the bar chart (graph 3) to calculate the average moss coverage, Yew trees have a mean of 2.93% moss coverage and Oak trees have a mean of 72.4%. So there is a significant difference between the groups of results. My bar graph (graph 1) and scatter graph (graph 2) further illustrate this, as they show that the moss coverage percentages are very high for the Oak trees (predominantly 70-100%) and very low for the Yew trees (mainly 0-4%). The scatter graph shows strong groupings, with the Oak tree readings concentrated towards the top end and the Yew tree readings are concentrated at the base of the graph. To case a point, if we look at trees number 9 on my bar graph, the Oak tree here has 100% moss coverage while the Yew tree has 1% moss coverage. If we look at trees number 15, the Oak tree has 98% moss coverage, while the Yew tree has 0% moss coverage. Using my Mann-Whitney U test calculation, I can safely reject my null hypothesis. To reject it my result had to be less than or equal to 64, my result came out as 4. Therefore, according to the table of critical values of U at the 5% level, I can be 95% certain I can reject the null hypothesis. Using the evidence supplied in my results, I can conclude significantly that the preferred habitat of moss is on the north side of an Oak tree rather than the north side of a Yew tree. ...read more.


to the 1 meter mark so moss may have been sampled at a height of over 1 meter where it will probably be less abundant. This could alter the numbers in the data as there is generally more moss on the trees lower down the trunk. It could have been enough to effect the general conclusion however it doubtful as 1 meter is still a long was up the trunk. A meter ruler could have been stood up on flat ground next to the tree, and another straight ruler or piece of wood placed flat on top to reach a height of 1 meter on the trunk. I could adopt a more precise technique with apparatus. For example, if I used a device such as an annometer to measure wind speed, I could connect it to a data logger and leave it for a week and not just one day to get averages which would be more accurate. For instance if I visited an area which had a large moss covering and took wind readings on what was a particularly windy day, I could presume that moss can grow in a strong prevailing wind, however, at any other time the area may be relatively sheltered from the wind. Taking averages over a period of time would not give me any misleading data. I could improve the accuracy of the results if I used other equipment and devices to survey the environment such as a hydrometer for example, which measures wind strength, and devices which measure light availability and moisture levels. Using this equipment would mean I could be very precise in selecting and sampling areas with similar physical conditions and may also enable me to link specific abiotic variables and their influence of the growth of moss. I believe my results are valid because they are a good reflection of the facts and information I collected on the preferred habitats of moss and how this relates to the features of Oak and Yew trees. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Living Things in their Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Living Things in their Environment essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Research question - Is using dogs for work ethical?

    5 star(s)

    I believe that if the owner taught their dog (when a puppy) to work hard for treats, it would grow up to be an appreciative dog and would be good in order to get treats/rewards. In my opinion dogs sometimes look like their owners because a clean and nicely groomed

  2. Marked by a teacher

    An Investigation into a Woodlice's Preferred Choice of Environment.

    3 star(s)

    The one I have chosen is the chi-square test. I have chosen this particular test as I have quantitative data and so will be able to conduct this test with ease. Once I have calculated the test, an overall result will enable me, by looking at a table about the

  1. Describe the differences between natural ecosystems and ...

    windbreaks, and soil erosion can reach more than 17 tonnes per hectare on bare soil (compared to 0.68 tonnes on grass). Losses are greatest during prolonged dry spells and dust storms or 'Fen blows'. Peat coverage was once up to 5 metres deep, but in places is now less than

  2. An Investigation To Observe the Preferred Habitat of common rough woodlice.

    Alternative Hypothesis The Porcellio scaber will prefer a humid atmosphere. Implementation The implementation of this investigation was carried out according to the plan specified previously. Results The controlled experiment showed an even distribution of Woodlice throughout the choice chamber. The following results were obtained: ATMOSPHERE TRIAL DRY HUMID 1 0

  1. Compare and contrast the morphological features of Lamellibranches and Brachiopods

    A few forms of brachiopods were able to live partially buried just below the sediment surface (out of view from predators), by having the anterior margin of the shell extended into an upward curving "flange" or "trail". By having no siphon in their soft parts, the shell became adapted to serve a snorkel-like function.

  2. Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism

    Fossil found of Homo habilis, dating back about 2.5 million years, was the first evidence of enlargement of human brains. Simple handmade stone tools are often found with the fossil, indicating that hominids have started to use their brains as well as their hands to fashion tools.

  1. The comparison of bacterial content in a range of milks.

    of the milk Number at 'y' point on the graph Number at 'x' point on the graph y/x total (gradient value) Raw 0.0695 60 1.16 x10-3 Whole pasteurized 0.044 60 7.30 x10-4 Semi-skimmed pasteurized 0.0385 60 6.40 x10-4 UHT 0.0345 60 5.75 x10-4 This calculation shows that there is a

  2. Investigating Seed Germination. Hypothesis If there is water, oxygen and a suitable ...

    This would then lead to the lengths of the seedlings being invalid as more than one condition is not present. All set ups will receive the same amount of oxygen available in the room, except set up 3. Set up 3 will be covered with a layer of oil where oxygen will not get through to the seed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work