**The data highlighted in BLUE is my own data, and the rest is of my peers
Analysis:
In this lab, my partners and I each measured the length and mass of 54 peanuts. The general trend was that the longer the length of the peanuts, the heavier it’s mass. The lengths were all over 10.0 (+/- 0.1 mm) and under 30.0 (+/- 0.1mm). The masses were all over 0.32 (+/- 0.01g) and under 1.25 (+/- 0.01g)
Processed Data Tables
Histograms of processed data in relation to the Length (+/- 0.1mm) and Mass (+/- 0.01g) of 54 Peanuts:
Analysis:
In this histogram, these are the results of the masses of 54 peanuts my partners and I measured. Most of our peanuts weighed between 0.6-0.79g. The masses all varied between 0.59-1.2g, with the smallest mass being 0.32g and the largest being 1.25g. There were no anomalies in our data.
Analysis:
In this histogram, these are the results of the lengths of 54 peanuts my partners and I measured. Most of our peanuts measured between 11.9-18.5mm. The lengths all varied between 11.9-30mm with the smallest length being 10mm and the largest length being 30mm. There were no anomalies in our data.
Scatter graph of correlation between Length (+/- 0.1 mm) and Mass (+/- 0.01g) of 54 Peanuts
Analysis:
In this scatter graph, these are the results of the lengths and masses of 54 peanuts my partners and I measured. You can see here that there is a very weak negative trend in the data. I find this strange as it is commonly conceived that the larger the length, the larger the mass of the specimen, however in my graph it shows the opposite. This can be because of inaccurate data. There are several anomalies in the data, such as a peanut that was only 12.2mm in length, but weighed 1.25g, which is the highest result for mass.