• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Lab Report on Acceleration

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Fatin Al Alawi

IB Physics 11 HL

Bahrain Bayan School

2006-2007

Lab Report

Investigation 4

Newton’s Second Law

Fatin Al Alawi

IB Physics 11 HL

Lab Report

Investigation 4

Newton’s Second Law

Duration: 3 hours

Aim:

To confirm the relationship between the net force applied to a body and the body’s acceleration.

Background:

This experiment has two parts

  • Part A: How does the acceleration of a trolley change as you change the weight of the total mass on a mass holder supported by a pulley?
  • Part B: How does the acceleration of a trolley change as you change the weight of the total mass on the trolley itself?

When the trolley is released, it accelerates to the right due to the mass on the mass holder, passing through two light gates. A scalar timer connected to each light gate records the time taken for a card mounted on the glider to pass through the light gate The time recorded at the two light gates is used to calculate 2 different speeds of the glider, and hence the acceleration of the glider may be found.

Equipment: Trolley, 2 light gates, 2 scalar timers, masses, string, card, ruler, electric scale

Part A:

Data Collection:

Mass of ‘Weight’ (g)

Time (s)

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Trial 4

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

30

0.84

0.44

0.87

0.45

0.85

0.44

0.86

0.44

40

0.62

0.33

0.64

0.32

0.63

0.32

0.62

0.32

50

0.52

0.28

0.53

0.27

0.53

0.27

0.53

0.27

60

0.45

0.24

0.46

0.24

0.46

0.24

0.46

0.24

70

0.42

0.22

0.42

0.22

0.41

0.21

0.41

0.21

80

0.39

0.20

0.39

0.20

0.39

0.20

0.39

0.20

90

0.37

0.19

0.36

0.19

0.36

0.19

0.36

0.19

100

0.34

0.17

0.34

0.18

0.34

0.17

0.34

0.18

110

0.32

0.17

0.32

0.17

0.32

0.17

0.32

0.17

120

0.30

0.16

0.30

0.16

0.30

0.16

0.30

0.16

Constants:
Mass of car 607.8 g
Distance between light gate 1(LG
1) to light gate 2 (LG2): 30 cm
Card length: 17 cm

Data Processing:

To convert the masses to forces we must do the following.

...read more.

Middle

0.85

0.88

0.47

0.89

0.98

0.50

0.97

1.08

0.53

1.00

1.18

0.57

1.06

To calculate the acceleration we will need to use the following equation for motion: image01.png

The next step is to make a (acceleration) the subject of the equation

image12.png

image02.png

image03.png

This means thatimage04.png, where v is final velocity, u is initial velocity, and s is the distance traveled which is a fixed value of 30 cm (Distance between Light Gate 1 and Light Gate 2)

Acceleration:

Force (N)

Acceleration (ms-2)

0.29

0.18

0.39

0.34

0.49

0.48

0.59

0.61

0.69

0.76

0.78

0.89

0.88

0.97

0.98

1.16

1.08

1.20

1.18

1.35

image15.png

There is a linear relationship in this graph; this shows that the net force is directly proportional to the acceleration.



Part B:

Data Collection:

 Additional Mass of Cart (g)

Time (s)

Trial 1

Trial 2

Trial 3

Trial 4

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

LG1

LG2

0

0.39

0.20

0.39

0.20

0.40

0.20

0.40

0.20

50

0.42

0.21

0.43

0.22

0.42

0.21

0.43

0.22

100

0.46

0.23

0.46

0.23

0.45

0.23

0.45

0.23

150

0.49

0.25

0.50

0.25

0.49

0.25

0.49

0.25

200

0.51

0.26

0.50

0.25

0.52

0.27

0.51

0.26

250

0.54

0.28

0.55

0.28

0.54

0.28

0.55

0.28

300

0.58

0.29

0.57

0.29

0.59

0.29

0.57

0.29

350

0.61

0.31

0.61

0.31

0.61

0.31

0.61

0.31

400

0.66

0.34

0.65

0.33

0.66

0.35

0.65

0.34

450

0.79

0.39

0.78

0.39

0.80

0.40

0.78

0.38

Constants:
Mass of car: 407.7 g
Distance between light gate 1(LG
1) and light gate 2 (LG2): 30 cm
Card length: 17 cm

Mass on Pulley: 50 g

Data Processing:

Mass of Cart:

To find the mass of the cart we need to add the initial mass of the cart to the additional mass added onto it. We also need to convert this number into kilograms.

Additional Mass on Cart (g)

...read more.

Conclusion

To ensure the accuracy of our lab we did many things. Firstly, we measured the distance between the light gates more than one and between trials. Secondly, we made sure that the light gates were placed parallel to the edge of the counter. Also, we drew a line that would show us where we should release the cart. Next, we did four trials instead of three or one trial. We weighed the cart more than once and we measured the length of the card more than once as well. Finally, we tried to keep the lab as accurate as possible by doing the same jobs each time because everybody does their own job in their own way and if that way was kept constant than our results would be more accurate.

Next time, we will use a different set-up, preferably with an air-track and a very streamlined glider. We will take even more accurate measurements so that our data would be even more accurate than it is. We will make sure we are releasing the cart from the same place each time, even if it means we need to use a magnifying glass. We will also try to do this lab in one sitting. Finally, we will try to come up with a way in which we will release the cart so that it would be the same each time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Hookes lab

    3 star(s)

    * It should be made sure that the meter rule is calibrated uniformly and is kept parallel to the suspended spring while taking the readings so that errors are reduced. * It should be made sure that all readings are taken at eye-level.

  2. Friction Lab

    First, we taped down the pen as a barrier, so the block of wood would not fall off the table when it was sliding across the surface being tested.

  1. Hookes lab Siddharth Nair

    * Metal spring with a pointer at the end. * Uniform meter- rule. * Uniform metal weights of 100g each. FAIR TEST: * It should be made sure that the surroundings are not very breezy so that it is made sure that the spring does not oscillate.

  2. Investigation into Friction.

    This means that the coefficient of friction is a dimensionless quantity. Graph 3 shows the gradient of the graph of the results for the smooth hardboard experiment. The coefficient for the smooth surface is 0.34. Graph 4 shows the gradient of the graph of the results of the rough hardboard experiment.

  1. To determine the relationship between mass and acceleration when force is kept constant.

    Also, if looked at closely, the line of the results does not go through the origin of the graph. This tells me that, just like activation energy is needed to be overcome before a chemical reaction can occur, a force is needed to provide an initial 'jump-start'.

  2. Parachutes Lab

    Therefore we can conclude that the time taken and the speed of a parachute is affected by its surface area. 2. Our second hypothesis stated, "Parachutes with a larger surface area will fall slower than ones with a smaller surface area, and will also take a longer time."

  1. Hooke's Law Lab

    1N Table 2.1 Extension caused by adding weights on spring 1: Sr.No. Original length(cm) � 0.05cm Force applied (N) Average new length (Trial 1+ trial 2) � 0.05cm Change in length (Extension)(cm) � 0.05cm 1. 13 1 13.45 0.45 2. 13 2 15.75 2.75 3. 13 3 19.40 6.40 4.

  2. The aim of this investigation is to see what the relationship between force, mass ...

    8 4.30 4.54 4.27 4.34 4.47 4.384 9 4.50 5.09 4.86 4.56 4.50 4.702 10 5.13 5.21 5.07 5.01 4.99 5.082 Processing results Mathematically generating mass; using equation- F/a =m Preliminary results force Acceleration (m/s/s) Actual mass Generated mass Difference Between 2 masses 3 2.06 0.831 1.456 0.625 6 3.74

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work