• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

Lab Report on Centripetal Motion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Fatin

Lab on Centripetal Motion

Lab Report

Duration: 2 hours

Instructor: Mr. Samir Chehab

Fatin Al Alawi


Lab on Centripetal Motion:Lab Report

Aim:

  1. To study the relationship between frequency, f, and centripetal force, Fc, when radius and mass are constant.
  2. To study the relationship between frequency, f and radius, when force, Fc, and mass, m, are kept constant.

Calibration of spring:

Data Collection:

Mass Added (g)

Reading on Scale (cm)

0

18

20

16.8

40

15.6

60

14.6

80

13.5

100

12.4

120

11.2

140

10.2

160

9.1

180

8

Constants:

  • Mass of spring
  • Acceleration due to gravity

Data Processing:

First, the results need to be converted to SI units

Mass Added (kg)

Reading on Scale (m)

0

0.18

0.02

0.168

0.04

0.156

0.06

0.146

0.08

0.135

0.1

0.124

0.12

0.112

0.14

0.102

0.16

0.091

0.18

0.08

When there was no mass added to the scale, the reading on the scale was 0.18 meters. This means that the extension after adding each mass can be calculated.

Mass Added (kg)

Extension (m)

0

0

0.02

0.012

0.04

0.024

0.06

0.034

0.08

0.045

0.1

0.056

0.12

0.068

0.14

0.078

0.16

0.089

0.18

0.01

When the scale is calibrated, the aim is to find the relationship between the force and the extension. This means that the force resulting from the addition of each mass must be calculated in this step.

Mass Added (kg)

Force (N)

0

0

0.02

0.196

0.04

0.392

0.06

0.588

0.08

0.784

0.1

0.98

0.12

1.176

0.14

1.372

0.16

1.568

0.18

1.764

Therefore,

Force (N)

Extension (m)

0

0

0.196

0.012

0.392

0.024

0.588

0.034

0.784

0.045

0.98

0.056

1.176

0.068

1.372

0.078

1.568

0.089

1.764

0.1

Now, the string constant, k, must be calculated. Since image00.png, where F is the force and x

...read more.

Middle

17.09

26.5

15

14.59

28

14

10.63

25.5

12

8.87

30.5

Constants:

  • Radius is meant to be constant; although that is impossible (the radius in the readings has a range of 5 cm, which is quite large)
  • Mass of spring and ball

Data Processing

Now, the extension must be calculated.

Reading on Scale (cm)

Extension (cm)

13

5

16

2

15

3

14

4

12

6

The results must now be changed into SI units


Extension (m)

Time for 20 Revolutions (s)

Radius (m)

0.05

9.63

0.295

0.02

17.09

0.265

0.03

14.59

0.28

0.04

10.63

0.255

0.06

8.87

0.305

In order to find the relationship between the force and the frequency, the results for the readings on the scale must be converted into force (N).

Extension (m)

Force (N)

0.05

0.88725

0.02

0.3549

0.03

0.53235

0.04

0.7098

0.06

1.0647

The readings were taken for the time for 20 revolutions, from this, the time for one revolution must be calculated.

Time for 20 Revolutions (s)

Time for one Revolution (s)

9.63

0.4815

17.09

0.8545

14.59

0.7295

10.63

0.5315

8.87

0.4435

Since image08.png then the inverse of the readings for time for one revolution must be calculated

Time for one Revolution (s)

Frequency s-1

0.4815

2.0768

0.8545

1.1703

0.7295

1.3708

0.5315

1.8815

0.4435

2.2548

Now, a graph of the force against the frequency can be plotted.

image19.png

The second point seems to be an outlier, it will be excluded from all graphs. Another graph will be plotted of Frequency against Force

image20.png

The slope of the linear trend line was calculated to be image21.png

However, another polynomial trend line was added, since it correlation is higher than that of the linear trend line, it should be explored further.

The formula for Centripetal force is:

image22.png

image23.png

This means that frequency squared is proportional to the centripetal force, so, a graph of force against frequency squared will be plotted.

Frequency s-1

Frequency2 s-2

2.0768

4.3133

1.1703

1.3695

1.3708

1.8791

1.8815

3.5399

2.2548

5.0841

...read more.

Conclusion

We had several errors in our lab. Firstly, we are not sure that our measurements are 100% correct. Secondly, we are not exactly sure whether the spring was calibrated all the time and calibrated properly all the time. Thirdly, it was difficult to have a steady force while twirling the ball, so the force was not the same all the time. Fourth, we are not sure whether the reading on the scale was read correctly while twirling the ball. Finally, there was a human error while handling the stopwatch. Humans have a reaction time of around 0.25 seconds and also there might have been counting errors.

Many changes can be done to this lab in order to make it better, but this lab will always have a large error no matter what is done. What can be done to improve is include more than one trial for all the readings. In addition, if this lab was computerized and mechanized then the error would be small. But for now, what can be done is to precision of the data as there are a lot of random errors in the lab.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Hookes lab

    3 star(s)

    * It should be made sure that the pointer of the spring is completely horizontal; therefore correct measurements of the extension will be taken from the meter-rule and so errors will be reduced. * It should be made sure that the clamp stand is very stable so that the spring does not oscillate and cause anomalous results.

  2. Friction Lab

    Lastly, the dependent variable is the friction force. II. Materials and Methods In preparation for doing our experiment, we gathered the following materials: Styrofoam, granite, felt, construction paper, tabletop surface, tape, a pen, a plastic cup, string, a paperclip, stopwatch, washers, and a block of wood.

  1. Hookes lab Siddharth Nair

    VARIABLES: Constant: > The surroundings that mean temperature, wind force, etc. > The equipments used in the experiment Independent: > The number of weights put on the spring Dependent: > The extension produced on the spring APPARATUS: * Clamp stand with a stable base.

  2. Parachutes Lab

    Conclusion: 1. Our first hypothesis stated, "The surface area of a parachute affects the time it takes to travel a calculated distance, and the speed at which it falls." We were able to prove this hypothesis right via the data we collected and our observations during the experiment.

  1. Lab Report on Acceleration

    They are traveling on different surfaces but are pushed with the same force. Body A has a smaller net force than body B; therefore you assume that Body A has a larger mass than Body B or Body B has a larger acceleration than Body A.

  2. Hooke's Law Lab

    This value is not a constant as it should have been due to the errors in the experiment. The average value is calculated as 0.814. The gradient of the graph of results also gives the spring constant. This value is found to be 0.33 and when this value is compared

  1. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    that makes up P.E: P.E = mgh P.E = mass x gravity x height So the higher an object goes, the more gravitational potential energy it gains. When it falls, it�s potential energy is converted into kinetic energy and; since energy can neither be created or destroyed, only converted; it will move at a faster speed.

  2. Investigating the amazingness of theBouncing Ball!

    Therefore making the balls more elastic, and so the collisiions more elastic (higher coefficient of restitution) with increasing temperature. The Effect Of Temperature On A Rubber Ball (Preliminary) This preliminary will be done to test out that indeed there is a noticeable change of the properties of the rubber ball at different temperatures.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work