Lab- Response Time

Authors Avatar

                

Response Time

Aim: To investigate whether the age of a human affects the reaction time.

Introduction:

Reaction time refers to the response of an organism to a stimulus, i.e. a factor leading to an organism reacting in some way. The average reaction time for a human is 0.200 to 0.250 seconds. This difference in reaction time varies from person to person due to various factors such as Age, Gender, Time, Environmental conditions, etc. Age being the most suitable factor, was chosen for the experiment.

A stimulus is detected by the eye and is transmitted to the brain in the form of a nerve impulse. This impulse is interpreted by the brain which sends another impulse to the muscles in order to respond appropriately. This process is slow for aging people as well as humans below the age of 10 while are comparatively faster for people in the age group of 10-25.

Join now!

 

Hypothesis: I hypothesize that humans who belong to age group 10- 25, will have a lesser reaction time when compared to humans belonging to the age groups :- below 10 and above 25.

Plan

Variables

Apparatus: -

  • 1 x 30 cm ruler
  • ‘Distance of ruler drop to Reaction time’ Conversion graph
  • Results table
  • Stool

Fig 1

Conversion graph

        

Fig 2

Method

  1. Collect apparatus as shown in diagram- fig 1
  2. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

Punctuation, grammar and spelling all done to a high level of accuracy. Layout is done well with clear subheadings.

The candidate starts with an aim for the experiment and some good background information. The candidate shows how the stimulus is processed, which would have been better aided by a diagram to show the simple neuronal pathway. The candidate also shows consideration of the different factors which could affect the experiment and attempt to account for them during the experiment. I would not use the words lesser reaction time I would use smaller reaction time. The experiment is researched well with the aid of diagrams to plot the reaction time against the drop distance and to show how the experiment is set up. The method is easy to read, but I'm not sure the experiment would be reliable as the drop distance start points would surely differ although this is accounted for to some degree. The errors and possible improvements are done well, although the candidate does not suggest many improvements to improve that particular method of experiment.

A very well done experiment which shows thought behind how the experiment is going to be conducted accounting for any errors that may occur and therefore affect the validity of the experiment