• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

Measuring the Viscosity of Honey

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Majd Shakir  -  L6.2   -  8/1/2003

Measuring the Viscosity of Honey

Aim:

Measuring the viscosity of honey using several ball bearings with known radii
and masses, and honey with a known mass and volume. Dropping them down
through the honey, and then researching the effects of radii against the terminal
velocity.

Introduction:
An object submerged in a fluid has got many   forces acting on it,
the diagram on the right shows the 3 forces that act on an object
submerged in a viscous fluid (in this case honey), those forces
are :

Weight (acts downwards) = Mass x Gravity

w=mg                    m= ρsVimage00.jpg

w= ρsV g

Upthrust= Density x Volume x Gravity

Upthrust= ρfV g

Viscous Drag= 6πrηυ    → from Stroke's Law


but once the object reaches terminal velocity , the forces acting on it

will be balanced , which means :

Upthrust + viscous drag = weight

So, in this Experiment, I will measure the viscosity of honey using a ball bearing with a known radius and mass, and honey with a known mass & volume . the terminal velocity in this experiment will be measured using the velocity formula  v=s/t , by measuring the distances the ball bearings travel and divide them by the time taken for them to pass through that distance (which is measured using the stop clock) .

Variables:
In this investigation there are many variables that will affect the terminal velocity of ball bearings as they pass through honey. These have been considered and the appropriate precautions taken so that their influence can be observed and analysed and the correct conclusions drawn.

Viscosity - any object moving through a viscous fluid is acted on by friction due to the fluid.

Temperature - An increase in temperature decreases the viscosity of a fluid and therefore decreases the friction opposing the motion of the ball bearings.

...read more.

Middle

Safety Considerations:

I believe this experiment is completely safe, as no sharp edges or hot liquids are used. Clamps and stands could be used as an extra precaution to prevent the cylinder from getting knocked over the table.

Honey is (obviously) a non-poisonous material, so it can be eaten off the hands safely, but I would suggest not to eat any honey due to its direct physical contact with the Lab's apparatus.

Basic Calculations:

5 Ball Bearings were used, for a quick reference, they were labeled B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5.

B1

B2

B3

B4

B5

Diameter  (mm)

12.98

11.76

9.50

7.92

5.98

Radius  (mm)

6.49

5.88

4.75

3.96

2.99

Mass (g)

8.963

6.685

3.517

2.049

0.886

Densities calculated as follows:

ρs = 3m/4r3π

Then the "Mean" of the calculated densities was taken :

__

Mean = x  =  Σreadings/ no. of readings

B1

B2

B3

B4

B5

Mean

Density(g/cm3)

7.83

7.85

7.83

7.88

7.91

7.86

Density of Steel = ρs= 7.86 x 103  kg/m3  ( +  0.05x103 )

Mass of Graduated Cylinder = 432g

Mass of (Cylinder+Honey)= 1143g

Mass of Honey= Mass of (Cylinder+Honey) – Mass of Graduated Cylinder

                        =  1143g  -  432g  = 711g

Volume of Honey = 503 cm3

Density of Honey = ρf = 1.41 x 103 kg/m3



This Figure represents the points at where my measurements were taken

Readings:

Diameter = B5  ( 5.98mm)

Distance (cm)

16-12

12-8

8-4

4-0

Time 1

4.10

4.63

4.81

4.81

Time 2

4.13

4.87

4.89

4.95

Time 3

4.00

4.57

4.83

4.81

Mean

4.08

4.66

4.84

4.86

Time taken by the object at Terminal Velocity =  (4.84 + 4.86)/2 = 4.85s

Terminal Velocity= Distance/Time = 4 x 10-2 / 4.85 = 0.82 x 10-2 m/s   +  0.005 x10-2

Diameter = B4  ( 7.92mm)

Distance (cm)

16-12

12-8

8-4

4-0

Time 1

2.85

3.27

3.61

3.62

Time 2

2.87

3.06

3.29

3.24

Time 3

2.77

2.98

3.39

3.55

Mean

2.83

3.10

3.43

3.47

Time taken by the object at Terminal Velocity =  (3.43 + 3.47)/2 = 3.45s

Terminal Velocity= Distance/Time = 4 x 10-2 / 3.45 = 1.16 x 10-2 m/s   +  0.005 x10-2

Diameter = B3 ( 9.50mm)

Distance (cm)

16-12

12-8

8-4

4-0

Time 1

1.69

1.90

1.90

1.87

Time 2

1.59

1.81

1.88

1.86

Time 3

1.84

2.22

2.06

2.12

Mean

1.71

1.97

1.95

1.95

Time taken by the object at Terminal Velocity =  (1.95 + 1.95)/2 = 1.95s

Terminal Velocity= Distance/Time = 4 x 10-2 / 1.95 = 2.05 x 10-2 m/s+  0.005 x10-2

Diameter = B2  ( 11.76mm)

Distance (cm)

16-12

12-8

8-4

4-0

Time 1

1.19

1.39

1.50

1.52

Time 2

1.22

1.34

1.46

1.43

Time 3

1.32

1.62

1.51

1.55

Mean

1.24

1.45

1.49

1.50

...read more.

Conclusion

Variation of temperature – Though a thermometer should have been used in this investigation to monitor the temperature, I didn’t use one. That is because I considered that the temperature would stay constant if the experiment was done within a 2-hour period in the same Lab-room.

Friction - Frictional forces acting from the sides of the cylinder may have had a significant effect on the ball-bearings by opposing their motion. This may have produced anomalous results that gave the unexpected trends on the graphs. To eliminate this in a future investigation, a much wider cylinder should be used. Also tweezers can be used to hold the ball-bearing and emerge it within the honey (at the centre) before letting it fall, this will let the ball-bearing bypasses the force affected on it by the surface tension of honey as well as preventing it from slipping towards the sides of the cylinder.

The most unusual trends/anomalies were found at the ball-bearings with the big radii, and this is because those ball-bearings had high terminal velocities, i.e.: they could move so fast downwards which made the measurements more inaccurate; and this supports my idea of using ball-bearings with smaller radii to achieve more accuracies, as it reduces the rate of the human error when starting/stopping/switching the stop-clocks.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Hookes lab

    3 star(s)

    GRAPH 2: This graph shows the average extension of the spring 2 when a force is applied ANALYSIS: By looking at the 2 graphs we can clearly see that my hypothesis was proven right as it can be clearly seen that the extension is directly proportional to the force applied.

  2. EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE THE VISCOSITY OF GLYCERINE.

    However taking an average of repeated readings helps to null the effect of this error. * The stopwatch measures to an accuracy of 0.01s. This is a source of error. However it is so slight that its effect can be ignored.

  1. Investigation into Friction.

    Where there was a sudden increase in the pressure exerted on the sensor, that would be taken as the force that was needed to move the block. The pressure sensor would have to be moveable, and this could be done by mounting it on rollers or castors.

  2. The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

    Initial speed at which the sphere descends - Releasing the sphere at same velocity every time is important. Otherwise the increase in rate of velocity will vary since the temperature will also vary. This is because the time taken for terminal velocity to reach varies.

  1. Bouncing Ball Experiment

    This was when the ball was falling in air. It provided me with five repeats so that the maximum and minimum results could be discounted and a reliable average could be taken. It was more reliable to use the middle three results as it automatically discounted any anomalies; assuming two

  2. An Investigation into the terminal velocity of steel ball bearings in Glycerol.

    The velocity will increase as long as F<R. The resultant force is R-F. Terminal velocity is reached when F=R. There is no acceleration. R-F = 0 Friction forces will oppose the motion of the falling ball. Friction will increase as the ball falls. When the ball is released from rest, the initial speed is zero, there is no friction force and the resultant force is R.

  1. Hooke's Law Lab

    Tables 1.2 and 2.2 contain the raw and processed data for the second spring. This spring is very flexible and its coils are not extremely close to each other. This spring was longer than the first spring with a length of 14.8cm and this was because of its coils not being so close to each other.

  2. Practical investigation into Viscosity in liquids (Stokes Law).

    0.20 0.20 0.200 50-70 0.20 0.19 0.2 0.197 Very Large Distance Timed (cm) Time taken(s) for ball bearing to pass through distance measured 1 2 3 Average 0-20 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.317 10-30. 0.28 0.29 0.27 0.280 20-40 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.263 30-50 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.240 40-60 0.22 0.23

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work