# Mechanics - "loop the loop"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mechanics 2 “loop the loop”

Task

What is the minimum release height needed to “loop the loop.” Investigate and validate.

To do this I will create a theoretical model to calculate the minimum height required for the roller coaster to just reach the top of the loop then look at the height required to fully complete a loop.

I will validate my theoretical model using a track.

Assumptions

So I can make a relatively simple model I will have to make some assumptions:

- There is no friction because if there was there would be some work done against it and would mean I could not use the conservation of energy. Roller coasters run on wheels against smooth metal which would not have much friction.
- Air resistance is negligible as most roller coasters are designed quite aerodynamically and have a large mass which would not be affected by a significant amount.
- No energy is lost e.g. sound and heat which would be a result of friction.
- There are no resistive forces
- The loop is an exact circle to make calculations easier and allows me use what I know about circular motion. My model loop starts and finished at the same place which could not happen in reality because the roller coaster could either not get on the loop or would do continuous loops.
- The value for gravity is constant. In reality it changes depending on the distance you are from the centre of the earth but the roller coaster does not have a big enough height difference between its highest and lowest points. This is the formula for calculating as value for gravity:

g = G m

r²

For example the value of gravity at the top of the roller coaster Kraken at Seaworld Orlando which is 45m above the earths surface is – 9.7999 this is almost the same as the value of gravity on the earths surface so will not make any significant difference to my model. I will use 9.8 ms-2 in my calculations.

- The roller coaster is a particle and not a long multi car carriage. This is to make calculations easier.
- Natural variables like the wind will be ignored.
- In my model I will use a straight ramp (see diagram below) leading to the loop rather than a curved section that a real life roller coaster would have. This is to make calculations easier.
- In my model I will assume that the roller coaster starts from rest.

Model

Symbols I will use in my calculations:

- r = radius of the loop
- k = constant co-efficient of r for specific loop where kr = minimum height required
- R = Normal reaction force between track and particle
- m = mass of object
- a = acceleration towards the centre of the circle
- θ = angle that the ramp makes with the horizontal
- g = acceleration due to gravity
- Ek = Kinetic energy
- Ep = Gravitational potential energy
- v = velocity at a given point

Middle

R + mg = (mv2)/r - mg from both sides

R = (mv2)/r – mg we know that R>0 therefore

(mv2)/r – mg > 0 + mg to both sides and x by r

mv2 > mgr divide both sides by m

v2 > gr

Now I will create a model to look at the height when the object is still in contact at point C and will complete a loop:

Using the conservation of energy:

Ep at A = Ep at C + Ek at C

mgkr = mg2r + ½ mv2 divide by throughout by m and x by 2

2gkr = 4gr + v2 - 4gr from both sides

v2 = 2gkr – 4gr but v2 > gr therefore

2gkr – 4gr > gr + 4gr and divide through by g

2kr > 5r divide both sides by 2r

k > 2 ½

Therefore h > 2 ½ r

This is only just higher that the value of h to “just” reach the top so it looks a bit small to be correct. I will do an experiment to validate my model for getting all the way around this and compare my results with my model.

Experiment

For the experiment I will use a marble and a loop the loop made from plastic curtain rail. I started by dropping the marble from the height h = 2r and measured the height it reached, the distance travelled until It completed the loop. I think that the height required will be more that 2.

Conclusion

If I had more time I would experiment more with a different track and objects with different values of friction, this would allow me to test my model even more to see if it is accurate. Maybe I could investigate a track that had a non-circular loop on it.

This would be difficult because it Is undergoing circular motion with a changing radius and maybe my model would involve differential equations.

mgkr = mg2r + ½ mv2 + F((kr/sinθ) + πr) rearrange and x2

2[mgkr - mg2r - F((kr/sinθ) + πr)] = mv2 divide throughout by m

(2/m)[mgkr - mg2r - F((kr/sinθ) + πr)] = v2 but we know v2 > gr therefore

(2/m)[mgkr - mg2r - F((kr/sinθ) + πr)] > gr rearrange to get

mgkr - mg2r - F((kr/sinθ) + πr) > ½ mgr rearrange and expand

mgkr - F(kr/sinθ) - Fπr > 2½ mgr + Fπr to both sides

mgkr - F(kr/sinθ) > 2½ mgr + Fπr factorise the left side

k ( mgr + Fr/sinθ) > 2½ mgr + Fπr divide by (mgr + Fr/sinθ)

k > (2½ mgr + Fπr)/( mgr + Fr/sinθ) simplify fraction by factor r

k > (2½ mg + Fπr/( mg + F/sinθ)

James Edward Haddow Mechanics 2 Loop the Loop

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

## Found what you're looking for?

- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month