• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Model the motion of a trolley running down a slope.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Halley Porkess        Mechanics 2 Coursework        09/05/2007

Investigation- modelling the motion of a trolley running down a slope

Aim

To model the motion of a trolley running down a slope.

Procedure

  1. Set up apparatus as shown in diagram above.
  2. Measure vertical height of stand, measure distance from base of stand to where the ramp meets the desk. Measure length of piece of card on the trolley, this is x. Also record the mass of the trolley.
  3. Mark on the ramp distances of 0.1m, 0.3m, 0.5m, 0.7m, 0.9m, 1.1m, 1.3m, 1.5m, and 1.7m up the ramp from the light gate.
  4. Place the front of the trolley on the 0.1m mark, reset the millisecond counter, and release the trolley.
  5. Repeat step 4 twice.
  6. Repeat steps 4 and 5 for distances of 0.3m, 0.5m, 0.7m, 0.9m, 1.1m, 1.3m, 1.5m, and 1.7m.

Experimental results

Mass of trolley is 1031g

Horizontal length of ramp is 2.315m

Vertical height of ramp is 0.11m        

Length of piece of card on trolley, x is 0.25m        

Ramp distance, s (m)

Reading 1 (s)

Reading 2 (s)

Reading 3 (s)

Average reading, T (s)

0.1

0.756

0.761

0.748

0.755

0.3

0.510

0.496

0.523

0.510

0.5

0.406

0.414

0.410

0.410

0.7

0.339

0.341

0.347

0.342

0.9

0.292

0.295

0.293

0.293

1.1

0.260

0.260

0.260

0.260

1.3

0.235

0.234

0.235

0.235

1.5

0.215

0.216

0.216

0.216

1.7

0.213

0.212

0.212

0.212

...read more.

Middle

opposite/ adjacent. Therefore, image03.png

The table below compares theoretical timings against the real times, using the formula image04.png

Ramp distance, s (m)

Theoretical time, t (s)

Experimental time, T (s)

0.1

0.546

0.755

0.3

0.397

0.510

0.5

0.328

0.410

0.7

0.285

0.342

0.9

0.256

0.293

1.1

0.234

0.260

1.3

0.217

0.235

1.5

0.203

0.216

1.7

0.192

0.212

The theoretical times are all lower then the experimental times, which indicates that there is something wrong with the modelling. To check this, I am going to work backwards to obtain a value for g.

As image05.png , image06.png, therefore image07.png

s (m)

t (s)

g (ms-2)

0.1

0.755

5.134

0.3

0.510

5.956

0.5

0.410

6.267

0.7

0.342

6.823

0.9

0.293

7.482

1.1

0.260

7.951

1.3

0.235

8.367

1.5

0.216

8.684

1.7

0.212

8.027

These values of g are appear to have a trend- however, I am now going to work out the error bounds for g, using the error bounds for t, found earlier.

G is tending to something slightly above 8, as Graph 1 shows. So even if it reaches 8.5 this is an error of nearly 15% on its true value of 9.81. My estimate of experimental errors are as follows:

Timing: accurate, no error (done electronically)

Measurement of

...read more.

Conclusion

F is image17.png.

s (m)

Ek observed (J)

EP lost (J)

Work done against friction (J)

Frictional force, F (N)

0.1

0.0565

0.1080

0.0515

0.2289

0.3

0.1239

0.2040

0.0801

0.1885

0.5

0.1917

0.3000

0.1083

0.1733

0.7

0.2755

0.3960

0.1205

0.1461

0.9

0.3753

0.4920

0.1167

0.1139

1.1

0.4766

0.5881

0.1115

0.0910

1.3

0.5834

0.6841

0.1007

0.0707

1.5

0.6906

0.7801

0.0895

0.0551

1.7

0.7169

0.8761

0.1592

0.0872

An average value for the frictional force F, is 0.1283

Conclusion

The original model of ignoring friction was not satisfactory. There clearly is resistance, as shown above. The resistance is not constant, however it seems to be greater at low speeds. A revised model could include a resistance force of 0.1N. This would be better but still not particularly accurate.

Further investigation would be needed to give more information about the frictional force. A better method would be to release the trolley with a electromagnet, which starts one millisecond timer, and allow the light gate to stop one millisecond timer, but start another, as in the experiment. This would mean that the error in releasing the trolley is less, and constant, and that there are two times, so there are actually two sets of data that can be compared against the results.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. An investigation into the acceleration of a trolley up a ramp.

    All of these problems could have been avoided by using a little bit more care and ensuring that these things were not going to occur. Also, if possible I would have liked to have used a trolley with wheels that produced less friction.

  2. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The trolley was then raised to 50cm in the same way as before. 8. The experiment was then repeated at 50cm height and the results recorded as before. The results of this investigation are displayed below. Gradient (cm) Number of Dots Time in 1/50th of a second (seconds)

  1. Investigating the Factors Which Affect the Motion of a Trolley Down an Inclined Plane

    Once the apparatus is set up like this, we will switch the Ticker Tape Timer on and release the trolley so that it can accelerate down the ramp. I will measure its speed from the very point it starts for two metres.

  2. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    For this reason ALL objects accelerate at the same rate ignoring air resistance. Prediction Using the sin function I can find out how high the ramp has to be for a 5� angle. The length of the ramp is 124.8cm.

  1. Approximate Stopping Distances

    * Age-related decline This usually won't mean they cannot drive at all, but they may need to see their doctor more often and they may possibly need to restrict driving. Health also affects thinking distances because if the driver has a mental problem they will take a lot longer to

  2. See if the height of the summit affects the average speed at which the ...

    With the primary experiment we should constrain it simply by not adding any weights to the trolley and always using the same trolley to collect each result. � Gravity - the last portion of the formula for potential energy is gravity, which will affect the outcome if it is increased or decreased.

  1. Prove that "Frictional Forces are Surface dependant".

    The force you need to apply is related to the weight of the book (equal to R) by the coefficient of static friction, symbol ?. If you try to push the book sideways with a force that is less than ?R, it is cancelled out by a corresponding frictional force, and the book does not move.

  2. Motion of an object as it slides down a slope at different angles to ...

    Otherwise the surfaces in contact are not the same and the calculations will become too heavy * The angle at which the gutter makes with the table/horizontal is constant even when the object is dropping. Since the gutter is rigid in real life situation this should not be too untrue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work