• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

nuclear powe

Extracts from this document...


Plan – Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future


  1. write out question and explain what is meant by it - √
  2. explain a bit of the history of when the idea of using nuclear power started and was developed (explain what is meant by the term ‘sustainable’) -

Main Core

  1. write out current ‘pros and cons’ of nuclear power. - √
  2. explain in detail each positive point -
  3. explain in detail every negative point -
  4. suggest alternatives and why they would/wouldn’t be a good solution - √


  1. write out what some people think and why -
  2. give opposing views -
  3. write out my view -
  4. explain the reasoning behind my view -
  5. give overall statement after finishing the case study and answer the question fully -


Page 1 -

Page 2 -

Page 3 -

Page 4 -


Is Nuclear Power The Answer For The Future?

In recent years, the Earth has seen changes in its climate.  The causes for this have been blamed on human behaviour as opposed to changes that have occurred naturally (http://www.bbc.co.uk/climate/evidence/).  So the question ‘Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?’ refers to the problem of climate change, and suggests that Nuclear Power could be the answer to this problem.  This is because scientists claim the emission of greenhouse gases, of which CO2 is the principal constituent, are the cause of climate change.  Nowadays, our main source of energy comes from burning fossil fuels, which generate vast amounts of CO2.

...read more.


  • Nuclear Power is thought to be dangerous but recently safety has been greatly improved in the power plants and is set to get even more safe as time progresses and the technology accordingly evolves.
  • There have been, and will continue to be, considerable developments in the technology making it safer and more efficient.


  • Nuclear Power produces waste which, at this moment in time, has no means of safe disposal.
  • Nuclear Power Stations produce radiation which if not carefully controlled represents a health risk
  • To build a Nuclear Power Station would require a large input of CO2 emitting engineering work.
  • There are fears that terrorists may be able to launch attacks against Nuclear Power stations with potentially devastating human consequences.  Also, illicit trade in radioactive reactor products for nuclear or ‘dirty’ bombs could be a major threat to world stability.
  • Meltdowns have occurred previously, e.g. Chernobyl, in which fission has run rampantly out of control with a disastrous aftermath.


  First and foremost, nuclear power would address the problem of fuelling Britain. Currently the majority of Britain is being powered by fossil fuels which are causing global problems. Also fossil fuels are not sustainable and thus won’t last us much longer. Some scientists predict that at current rates we can only continue using fossil fuels for about 86 years. If we managed to make nuclear power our main energy source, we would certainly reduce the amount of CO2 we produce. This is a very positive point for nuclear power and remains a strong argument in the debate about our power difficulties.

...read more.




Now I have looked at each side of the ‘nuclear power debate’ I understand why the matter is so complex, and such a hard question to answer. I feel that Nuclear Power could be the ‘fuel of the future’ but we would have to go about it very carefully. Nuclear power stations would have to be carefully monitored regularly, especially the waste products so they don’t get into the wrong hands. Also, the waste would have to be safely retained in a way which doesn’t harm the environment until we find a way to dispose of it safely. Finally, I feel that we should not only look to using nuclear power as our only form of power, but should maximize our use of renewable energy since we know that is our greenest energy option.  I am aware that renewable sources don’t produce enough power to fuel Britain but they could certainly contribute, and all the energy we get from renewable sources, rather than nuclear power, would be helping our environment as much as possible.


Betts, K.S. (2007).   Technology solutions: Reshaping nuclear fuel.  Environmental Science and Technology, 41 (3), 676 -677.

Lovelock, J (2007). Go nuclear, save the planet. The Sunday Times News Review, February 18. (pg. 5)

Web Links:








...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

    4 star(s)

    This is a major problem in today's world and it may cause the polar caps to melt resulting in rising sea levels. According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, the power produced by the world's nuclear plants would normally produce 2 billon metric tons of CO2 per year if they depended on fossil fuels.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'Is Nuclear Power the Solution to our Energy Problems?' Case Study

    4 star(s)

    They reduce countries' reliance on fossil fuel for their energy provision." This source gives some of the major benefits of nuclear power. This source shows that due to the world rapidly running out of fossil fuels a new source

  1. Should we build more nuclear power stations?

    is because nuclear power stations do not produce carbon dioxide emissions or smoke, thus not contributing to global warming which helps to solve 2 problems at once.

  2. Should we use Nuclear power in the UK

    I think although nuclear power is very expensive we should give the go ahead. Advantages The advantages are it cost the same amount as coal so it's not expensive to make and it produces Very large amounts of electricity can be generated from small amounts of fuel also it does

  1. Should we use Nuclear power in the UK

    Nuclear power itself is expensive, energy generating boards will have to update the machines or replace them with nuclear power stations, unearthing the material, security for the material and the safety for the radioactive waste. The Quotation Independent nuclear consultant John Large: 'This means that not only will spent nuclear

  2. Should radioactive smoke alarms be a compulsory purchase?

    The chart below shows the number of non-fatal casualties resulting from fires depending on the presence and operation of smoke alarms. Surprisingly, this chart shows the opposite of what you might expect-an increase in the number of non fatal causalities where a smoke alarm WAS present AND raised the alarm,


    I think this, because although they know it may be a little more expensive than other ways, it is worth it at the end because the coal emissions are much less which contribute less to global warming. However, on the other hand, the energy that is produced from the chain

  2. Does the UK need new nuclear power stations?

    However, following the Fukushima accident in March 2011; the effect this had on the population of Japan was catastrophic as it resulted to a leak of radiation which could harm the people living nearby. By October 2011 the government published a white paper confirming that "Japan's dependency on nuclear energy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work