• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nuclear Power

Extracts from this document...


The benefits and drawbacks of Nuclear Power Nuclear Power is power that is generated by a controlled chain-reaction from nuclear fission in which a uranium-235 atom splits up into two daughter nuclei (Krypton-91 and Barium-143); the uranium also releases three neutrons when it splits. In nuclear reactors these neutrons are controlled by boron control rods so that only one neutron can get through to the next enriched uranium rod and initiate further nuclear fission, this process is called a chain reaction. In a nuclear power plant the vast amount of heat energy that is released from a chain reaction is carried to the heat exchanger, where the heat will be transferred into a water pipe, turning the water into steam (there are variations but the diagram above shows the major system). As in coal powered power stations this steam is then used to turn a turbine which in turn will turn a generator so an electrical current can be induced. Currently in the UK there are only 19 operational nuclear reactors generating 11852 megawatts of electricity, however the government wants to expand the UK's nuclear program so they can meet the targets set by the Kyoto Protocol of reducing the carbon emissions to 40% by 2050, nevertheless people are unsure about the environmental and social impacts of nuclear power. This report will explain the benefits and drawbacks of nuclear power using the statements provided by Susie and Alan. Nuclear power is a clean source of energy compared to the fossil fuels we use today. One of the substantial problems we have in the world today is the increase in the rate of global warming which is caused by carbon dioxide that is released from fossil fuels. This carbon dioxide that is releases by power stations using fossil fuels adds to the greenhouse gases which in turn increases global warming, over time this has increased to a point where we could start seeing major disasters around the world because of global warming. ...read more.


This table shows that between 1970-92 there have been only 31 immediate deaths due to the production of nuclear power and they were all workers compared to the 6400 workers killed by producing coal. However this data is not totally valid for two reasons; firstly, there are fewer nuclear power stations than of power stations that use fossil fuels so the chance of death in a fossil fuel power station is greatly increased. Also this table only takes into account IMMEDIATE death and the major factor of a nuclear disaster is the radiation emitted, this radiation will not cause IMMEDIATE death in most cases but mutations which could lead to death as time passes. An even more unlikely event is nuclear explosion is even more unlikely as for a nuclear explosion to take place the reactor core would have to go into meltdown. A meltdown occurs when the chain reaction becomes uncontrolled and nuclear fission happens simultaneously at a high speed, however with new technology nowadays, it is highly unlikely a power plant will go into nuclear meltdown as the control rods would stop this and the uranium is highly purified. As long as the power plant is maintained well, there should be no problems such as leakages and explosions; if there were to be an explosion like in Chernobyl there would be massive radiation release and immense heat that would almost certainly cause death in the power plant which is why there were 47 deaths in the Chernobyl incident. In terms of something going wrong and nuclear waste Alan is correct as nuclear waste and nuclear disasters can 'cause lots of damage to the environment when something goes wrong and is dangerous to humans'. Here is a table showing nuclear power plants that have had to be repaired or shut down: This table shows all the nuclear cores that had to have major repairs or had to be de-commissioned. ...read more.


In my opinion nuclear power is the way forward, as France have proven, because it is a 'clean', reliable and efficient source of energy by producing 78% of its electricity by nuclear power as do a few other countries. There is plenty or uranium to provide the whole world with energy; the problem of disasters are also becoming minimal as new technology makes the chances of a nuclear leakage or meltdown slimmer and slimmer. The government will need to switch to nuclear power to meet their carbon emission target of a 60% cut in carbon emissions by 2050, the new technology being developed everyday and the robust security systems make a nuclear leakage very unlikely, it statistical terms very near impossible as out of the 250+ nuclear stations in western Europe none have created a massive health problem. The only major problem is the disposal of the spent fuel rods which are classified as high-level waste; if this problem can be solved indefinitely then nuclear power would be the perfect source of energy for years to come. For the government to solve the nuclear debate they will have to educate the public in an unbiased way and let them choose if nuclear power should be used or not because current figures show that nearly half of the public are undecided on whether or not nuclear power is the way forward. Many members of the public are afraid of a nuclear explosion but it should be emphasized that a commercial-type reactor can under no circumstances explode like a nuclear bomb. However recent research, as mentioned before, has revealed that around 12 million people will die due to likely floods if global warming continues compared to the 4000 that could die in a major nuclear disaster. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jaimit Dattani 11x1 05 January 2008 GCSE Additional Science (2103) Unit P2 (5023) Topic 12 - Power of the atom Project 1 | Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

    4 star(s)

    This means it does not cause climate change and rising sea levels and it doesn't cause acid rain.[5] Switching to nuclear power from our current power source of fossil fuels will slow down pollution and global warming. Nuclear power is also cost effective.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'Is Nuclear Power the Solution to our Energy Problems?' Case Study

    4 star(s)

    This source serves as a strong counter-argument for some of the pro-nuclear power arguments. This source was taken from the Independent which is a well respected newspaper which prides itself in being "free from party political bias, free from proprietorial influence" suggesting that the newspaper is reliable.

  1. Should we build more nuclear power stations?

    I got the information needed to make this graph from the OCR handout so it is reliable and should not be biased. Conclusion In conclusion to the question, should we build more nuclear power stations, I think that there are many positive aspects of using nuclear power.

  2. Is Nuclear power a safe and sustainable way forward?

    However, simple doesn't necessarily mean cheap, definitely not in this case, as I will be mentioning in the disadvantages section a little later on. (Image from: http://www.freeinfosociety.com/images/science/nuclearenergy1.jpg) Nuclear energy is not just produced directly on plants. When nuclear power is used to power something like a submarine, the reactor runs the engines, with the steam directly powering the engines.

  1. Radiation: are mobile phones unsafe? Mobiles use electromagnetic radiation in order to send and ...

    - http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/healthyliving/cancercontroversies/mobilephones/ This seems very reliable since it states that even the largest study which has taken place has not proved any link to cancer, and of course, a larger study would be more reliable than a small study. Research was carried out on a very large number of people

  2. Are mobile phones harmful to our health

    "This biased appraisal of the science should be viewed cautiously by the general public." Professor Mike Repacholi, co-coordinator of the WHO electromagnetic fields project 1996-2006, said there was no scientific basis to a link between "electromagnetic hypersensitivity" - where symptoms include burning sensation on the skin and fatigue - and exposure to EMF.

  1. Should we use Nuclear power in the UK

    But first the energy must be realeaed. It can be released from atoms in two ways: nuclear fusion and nuclear fission Reference: (http://www.explainthatstuff.com/atom.jpg) Nuclear fission During nuclear fission a small particle called a neutron hits the uranium atom and splits it, releasing a great amount of energy as heat and radiation.

  2. Should we use Nuclear power in the UK

    About 66% of the world's electrical power is provided by fossil fuels (Updated Feb 12, 2008, http://www.darvill.clara.net/altenerg/fossil.htm, Title: Coal, Oil and Gas are called "Fossil Fuels") Coal provides around 28% of the worlds energy and oil 40%, but these figures are on the increase.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work