• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

nuclear power stations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nuclear power stations–Are they safe?

By Sophie Zhao 11N

Introduction

In this report, I will attempt to find out if nuclear power stations are safe. Assuming people who read this report has no background knowledge on this topic, I will explain some basic facts about it. Then, I am going to write the arguments for and against nuclear energy, and the evidence behind it. The arguments will only backed up by safety issues. Before I start, I would like to remind the readers that the word safe is a relative term. No method of extracting energy is 100% safe. The only way to find out if Nuclear power stations are safe is to compare it with other types of power stations.

Background

To fully understand the risks involved, it is vital to know how a nuclear power station works. Basically, they work by using nuclear fission to release energy to create electricity. When this nuclear chain reaction is controlled, the energy released can be used to heat water, produce steam that drives a turbine, generating electricity.[9]

How a nuclear power station work.

image00.jpg

However, we must also take into account, the entire lifecycle of a nuclear power station and the fuels used

 [12]image01.jpg

image02.jpg[4]

Yes, nuclear power is safe

Some argue that the only way we could satisfy our energy needs without damaging the environment is to use nuclear power. Fossil fuel power stations generate large amounts of CO2,

...read more.

Middle

Workers

342

Natural gas

1200

Workers & public

85

Hydro

4000

Public

883

Nuclear

31

Workers

8

*Basis: per million MWe operating for one year, not including plant construction . [6]

While increased exposure to high radiation increases the chance of getting cancer, it doesn’t mean you will definitely get it. [2] Therefore, it’s hard to accurately calculate the number of death caused by ionising radiation released by a major nuclear disaster like Chernobyl.

The media often exaggerate events to gain viewers/buyers, bad news always sell.

image03.pngthe graph above shows that Coal, the fuel used in many power stations kills 110.4% more people than nuclear power!

No, nuclear power is not safe.

Nuclear reactors contain very large amounts of radioactive isotopes. If this radioactivity were to escape the reactor, it would have serious effects. This is because the radiation often carries a large amount of energy, which breaks up the molecules that absorb it into smaller bits called ions by changing the difference between the number of protons and electrons. The process, called ionisation can damage or kill living cells. The effects of exposure to high levels of ionising radiation include increased rates of cancer, this happens when the cell’s DNA is damaged, and the cell develops out of control. The ionising radiation also causes genetic defects and even death when irradiation is extreme, as the radiation can kill the cell.  [1]

...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Nuclear power can be the answer to the growing gap in our energy supply. If the stations are designed and managed well, the risks of something going wrong are very small. But I don’t believe we should use nuclear power as the main source of our energy need because the risks outweigh the benefits. The consequence of a major disaster is something that is hard to deal with. Radioactive contamination does not respect national boarders, as shown by the Chernobyl disaster. Mostly importantly, the problem with radioactive waste nuclear power stations produce cannot be ignored. The problem doesn’t just affect us; it will affect many more generation. But because our civilisation is dependent on electricity, I think it is acceptable to use nuclear power for the moment while we adapt to smaller energy consumptions and invest in alternatives.

Bibliography

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica
  1. 21st century science: GCSE science higher

3) http://www.iea.org/dbtw-wpd/Textbase/nppdf/free/2006/key2006.pdf

4) http://www.anl.gov/Media_Center/logos20-1/passive01.htm

5)http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnBRwKA8scmDPVBbGlNx.WkgBgx.;_ylv=3?qid=20071113052608AASlAlQ

6) http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html

  1. http://www.uic.com.au/ne6.htm
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Long_term_management_of_waste
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power
  1. http://srs.dl.ac.uk/Annual_Reports/AnRep01_02/radioactive-waste-fig2.jpg
  1. http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/B23_051004waste.jpg
  1. The Agesta nuclear power station.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

    4 star(s)

    There is nuclear waste produced, like the spent fuel. This needs to be stored securely as it is highly radioactive. A concrete liner typically houses the reactor's pressure vessel and acts as a radiation shield. That liner, in turn, is housed within a much larger steel containment vessel. This vessel contains the reactor core, as well as the equipment plant workers use to refuel and maintain the reactor.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'Is Nuclear Power the Solution to our Energy Problems?' Case Study

    4 star(s)

    This source serves as a strong counter-argument for some of the pro-nuclear power arguments. This source was taken from the Independent which is a well respected newspaper which prides itself in being "free from party political bias, free from proprietorial influence" suggesting that the newspaper is reliable.

  1. Nuclear Power

    Alternatives to this include continuing to store the HLW waste above ground, dispose of it in the sea in special containers, burying it under the seabed, launching it into space. The problems of all of these are that they are very expensive and would cost billions of pounds to do

  2. Do Mobile Phones Cause Brain Tumours

    This argument is convincing as it includes several strong premises to support it. Nevertheless, many of these premises are just educated guesses with no substantial evidence backing them up. Even so, the argument does insist that only educated guesses can be made until further research is carried out and more evidence is gained.

  1. research and report

    thermographic cameras are designed with only a single type of sensor responding to a particular wavelength range of infrared radiation. Inside the camera Thermographic camera is a device that detects infrared radiation and convert it into an electrical signal, then produce a thermal image on a computer.

  2. health risks of mobile phones

    In an article in the New Scientist earlier this year, stated that "a mild bout of exercise will heat your head more than the puny microwaves that the devices emit". The jury is still out officially, with MPs still deciding there was no concrete evidence on the issue.

  1. Radiation: are mobile phones unsafe? Mobiles use electromagnetic radiation in order to send and ...

    This diagram from http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/cellphonecancer.php shows the difference in the frequency levels of different types of radiation: "The use of mobile phones has skyrocketed since the 1980s. But studies in the USA and New Zealand have found that during this time, the numbers of people with brain cancer has not changed very much."

  2. The advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power and fossil fuels and which is the ...

    by a factor of 10, then I lowers by a factor of 10 (at constant power) and the power dissipated as heat lowers by a factor of 102. Hence at 1200 Volts we have only 69.4 watts of energy loss and a 99% energy efficient delivery system, which is much cheaper for both producer and buyer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work