• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

nuclear power stations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nuclear power stations–Are they safe?

By Sophie Zhao 11N

Introduction

In this report, I will attempt to find out if nuclear power stations are safe. Assuming people who read this report has no background knowledge on this topic, I will explain some basic facts about it. Then, I am going to write the arguments for and against nuclear energy, and the evidence behind it. The arguments will only backed up by safety issues. Before I start, I would like to remind the readers that the word safe is a relative term. No method of extracting energy is 100% safe. The only way to find out if Nuclear power stations are safe is to compare it with other types of power stations.

Background

To fully understand the risks involved, it is vital to know how a nuclear power station works. Basically, they work by using nuclear fission to release energy to create electricity. When this nuclear chain reaction is controlled, the energy released can be used to heat water, produce steam that drives a turbine, generating electricity.[9]

How a nuclear power station work.

image00.jpg

However, we must also take into account, the entire lifecycle of a nuclear power station and the fuels used

 [12]image01.jpg

image02.jpg[4]

Yes, nuclear power is safe

Some argue that the only way we could satisfy our energy needs without damaging the environment is to use nuclear power. Fossil fuel power stations generate large amounts of CO2,

...read more.

Middle

Workers

342

Natural gas

1200

Workers & public

85

Hydro

4000

Public

883

Nuclear

31

Workers

8

*Basis: per million MWe operating for one year, not including plant construction . [6]

While increased exposure to high radiation increases the chance of getting cancer, it doesn’t mean you will definitely get it. [2] Therefore, it’s hard to accurately calculate the number of death caused by ionising radiation released by a major nuclear disaster like Chernobyl.

The media often exaggerate events to gain viewers/buyers, bad news always sell.

image03.pngthe graph above shows that Coal, the fuel used in many power stations kills 110.4% more people than nuclear power!

No, nuclear power is not safe.

Nuclear reactors contain very large amounts of radioactive isotopes. If this radioactivity were to escape the reactor, it would have serious effects. This is because the radiation often carries a large amount of energy, which breaks up the molecules that absorb it into smaller bits called ions by changing the difference between the number of protons and electrons. The process, called ionisation can damage or kill living cells. The effects of exposure to high levels of ionising radiation include increased rates of cancer, this happens when the cell’s DNA is damaged, and the cell develops out of control. The ionising radiation also causes genetic defects and even death when irradiation is extreme, as the radiation can kill the cell.  [1]

...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Nuclear power can be the answer to the growing gap in our energy supply. If the stations are designed and managed well, the risks of something going wrong are very small. But I don’t believe we should use nuclear power as the main source of our energy need because the risks outweigh the benefits. The consequence of a major disaster is something that is hard to deal with. Radioactive contamination does not respect national boarders, as shown by the Chernobyl disaster. Mostly importantly, the problem with radioactive waste nuclear power stations produce cannot be ignored. The problem doesn’t just affect us; it will affect many more generation. But because our civilisation is dependent on electricity, I think it is acceptable to use nuclear power for the moment while we adapt to smaller energy consumptions and invest in alternatives.

Bibliography

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica
  1. 21st century science: GCSE science higher

3) http://www.iea.org/dbtw-wpd/Textbase/nppdf/free/2006/key2006.pdf

4) http://www.anl.gov/Media_Center/logos20-1/passive01.htm

5)http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnBRwKA8scmDPVBbGlNx.WkgBgx.;_ylv=3?qid=20071113052608AASlAlQ

6) http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html

  1. http://www.uic.com.au/ne6.htm
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Long_term_management_of_waste
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power
  1. http://srs.dl.ac.uk/Annual_Reports/AnRep01_02/radioactive-waste-fig2.jpg
  1. http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/B23_051004waste.jpg
  1. The Agesta nuclear power station.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

    4 star(s)

    There is nuclear waste produced, like the spent fuel. This needs to be stored securely as it is highly radioactive. A concrete liner typically houses the reactor's pressure vessel and acts as a radiation shield. That liner, in turn, is housed within a much larger steel containment vessel. This vessel contains the reactor core, as well as the equipment plant workers use to refuel and maintain the reactor.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    'Is Nuclear Power the Solution to our Energy Problems?' Case Study

    4 star(s)

    This source serves as a strong counter-argument for some of the pro-nuclear power arguments. This source was taken from the Independent which is a well respected newspaper which prides itself in being "free from party political bias, free from proprietorial influence" suggesting that the newspaper is reliable.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Ionisation smoke alarms use an ionisation chamber and a source of ionising radiation to ...

    3 star(s)

    Whilst alpha cannot penetrate your skin, people can eat or drink something contaminated with an alpha source.[10] This would leave you with alpha particles in your body, which is very dangerous as they can ionise atoms in your cells. If a cell has been ionised in your body, then the

  2. Nuclear Power

    The containers are currently stored at government owned facilities around the world but many countries in Europe are now looking at burying containers deep underground, but this is not entirely safe as if some of the spent fuel were to escape from the containers it would cause major radioactive contamination in the area which could mutations for centuries.

  1. Do Mobile Phones Cause Brain Tumours

    The percentage increase may seem large but the actual amount of brain tumours increased by only two. I think that this tiny increase could just be an outcome of a factor, which is not mobile phone usage, which may have also been increasing in use over the years.

  2. health risks of mobile phones

    The eyes are particularly vulnerable due to the lack of blood flow in that area. The added concern with non-ionizing radiation, the type of radiation associated with mobile phones, is that it could have long-term effects. The following illness have potential links to mobile phone radiation: �Cancer & Brain tumours

  1. Radiation: are mobile phones unsafe? Mobiles use electromagnetic radiation in order to send and ...

    Neither do we know how many tests were carried out and how long they spent doing the tests, how long they gathered research for and then how long they spent compiling these results and then finalising them. Another study I found claims to be the largest study so far on mobile phones...

  2. The advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power and fossil fuels and which is the ...

    How a transformer works (A transformer) A transformer uses alternating current in one coil to induce alternating current in another. The induced voltage is given by: Vout = Vin x N2/N1 where N1= Number of coils in the Primary and N2= Number of coils in the secondary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work