• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Photosynthesis. I have been given the task of analysing and evaluating an experiment carried out by year 10 students to find the optimum distance for a lamp to be placed to enable aquatic plants to photosynthesise

Extracts from this document...


Photosynthesis Coursework Thomas Hansen I have been given the task of analysing and evaluating an experiment carried out by year 10 students to find the optimum distance for a lamp to be placed to enable aquatic plants to photosynthesise. Here is a table of results showing what five different groups recorded. Number of Bubbles Recorded in Five minutes Distance Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Average (1.d.p) 0cm 32 48 36 96 21 46.6 10cm 39 45 36 110 27 51.4 20cm 26 52 29 58 32 39.4 30cm 10 27 11 38 45 26.2 40cm 3 7 1 15 7 6.6 50cm 2 2 1 5 0 2 60cm 1 2 1 4 1 1.8 I have drawn a graph to illustrate the average values of these groups. As you can see, there are three clear sections to the graph, labelled A, B, and C. The shape of the graph shows a steady increase in the amount of bubbles given off through the experiment, showing a clear optimum distance for the light, and levelling out where the lamp is so far away it adds an almost negligible amount to the background light. The optimum distance according to these results is 10cm, where the average amount of bubbles is 51.4. This can be seen as the peak on the graph. This is the maximum amount of bubbles that can be given off by the pondweed during photosynthesis, indicating the ideal amount of light that the pondweed needs to be most productive. ...read more.


This can be seen as true in section B on the graph, as the closer the lamp got to the pondweed, the more bubbles were given off in proportion to it. The results show that this is not true though in sections A and C, but this is not because of the lamp, but of external factors, in A heat becomes a factor that affects the rate of photosynthesis, and in C, the lamp is so far away that backlight from the room affects the rate of photosynthesis more than the lamp. The second prediction was that the rate of photosynthesis would increase at a constant rate as the distance between the lamp and plant was reduced. This is also partly correct, as in section B, the rate of photosynthesis seems directly proportional to the distance of the lamp from the plant. But in A and C, again, this is not correct, as again other independent variables are introduced which affect the rate of photosynthesis. Both predictions would have been right, had the light from the lamp been the only factor being changed to affect the rate of photosynthesis, we would have seen a straight line on the graph. But because the experiment became susceptible to factors apart from the light from the lamp, the predictions were only partly right. Evaluation This experiment did collect results that supported the predictions made to some extent, and so it could be called a success. But because the results recorded indicated that other factors had affected the experiment apart from the light intensity from the lamp, this experiment failed to get accurate results that fully supported the predictions made. ...read more.


This experiment could have been improved by the use of light sensors, which could have been used to make sure each piece of pondweed got the same amount of light. Heat from the lamp could have affected the rate of photosynthesis, to prevent this happening, a protective screen made of glass could have been put in between the lamp and pondweed to prevent heat from the lamp getting to it. The amount of CO2 in the water would have been depleted at the end of the experiment, decreasing the rate of photosynthesis. To avoid this, the water in the boiling tubes could have been replaced for each separate light intensity, so preventing the CO2 from becoming an unwanted variable. The way in which bubbles were counted was not specified, they could have been counted as they formed on the plant, or as they reached the surface of the water, etc. Without a specific way of counting the bubbles, we cannot assume that all bubbles were counted accurately; some may have been counted twice if they were counted both when on the plant, and as they left it. To prevent this, bubbles should only be counted when they leave the plant's surface. Future experiments could include investigating the other factors affecting the rate of photosynthesis, such as temperature, CO2, or mineral concentration. The effect of temperature could be measured by heating the tube in which the pondweed is, and seeing how that affects the rate of photosynthesis by again counting bubbles. Distilled water could be used compared with tap water to see how CO2 and mineral concentration affect the rate of photosynthesis by counting how many bubbles were produced for each. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Green Plants as Organisms section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Green Plants as Organisms essays

  1. How temperature affects the rate of photosynthesis.

    Scalpel 1 To cut the elodea to length of 50mm at an angle. Ruler 1 To measure the length of the elodea to be cut accurate to 50mm. It will also be used to keep the lamp 50mm away from the apparatus.

  2. To Find Out If Light Intensity Has an Effect On a Plants Rate of ...

    I have chosen to study the light reaction. Therefore, I will ensure that all the other variables are carefully monitored and kept the same, as this is crucial to a fair experiment. The graph above shows my prediction of what I believe will happen in my experiment. The point where it stops increasing is where another variable becomes the limiting factor.

  1. An Investigation into Species Diversity with distance along a Pingo.

    The palisade cells have many chloroplasts, containing chlorophyll in the cell cytoplasm. These trap then sunlight for use in photosynthesis. The spongy mesophyll contains many air spaces for gaseous exchange, i.e. for CO2 to reach the cells for photosynthesis and for O2 to be used in respiration and excess to leave via the stomata.

  2. Water and Mineral Nutrition in Plants

    through the Cortex, mostly between cells, called the apoplast pathway, and into the stele via the endodermis. Water and minerals can also move from cell to cell within the cortex, called the symplast pathway. From the stele, most minerals are moved along with water in xylem which is continuous throughout the plant.

  1. Three separate experiments which are to be carried out to investigate a plant's unique ...

    The guard cell's function is to prevent CO2 entering the leaf during the night, when photosynthesis is not talking place, and to prevent excess water loss through the stomata. Generally the guard cells are 'open' in daylight and 'closed' at night time.

  2. Compare the effect of heavy and light oil on terrestrial plants.

    Protection of wetlands, by responding to an oil spill at sea, should be a high priority since physical removal of oil from a marsh or from within a mangrove forest is extremely difficult. OUTLINE METHOD :- Factors: - The variables include :- > Heavy and light oil that plants will

  1. Investigate the effect of light intensity on the rate of photosynthesis in an aquatic ...

    Similarly, by providing the plant with a greater intensity of light, I will be enabling the plants' process of photosynthesis to take place more intensively, as the factor required (in this case light) is available at a greater quantity. (The rate of photosynthesis taking place within the plant will increase)

  2. To investigate certain factors which affect the rate of photosynthesis in plants and how ...

    The greater the intensity of light the greater the rate of photosynthesis because the chloroplasts can absorb more energy from the light and use it to combine the carbon dioxide with the water to make the glucose. The opposite is true if there is an insufficient amount of light available; the rate of photosynthesis becomes slower.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work