• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Physics ball bearing investiagtion

Extracts from this document...



By Jessica Tilbrook

Physics coursework – data analysis: ball bearing

Aim: -

To establish the relationship between the heights from which the ball bearing was dropped and the depth of the crater created in the sand.

Apparatus: -

  • 1 x clamp (stand)                        - Somewhere to record your results.
  • 1 x ball bearing (0.0165kg)                - 1 x Boss head
  • 1 x tray full of sand                        - 1 x Magnet
  • 5 – 10 candles                                - 1 x Nail
  • Matches
  • Gogglesimage24.png
  • Newspaper
  • 1 x 1 metre rulerimage00.pngimage01.png

How your apparatus should be set up image12.png


Method: -

  1. Get all the Apparatus out, and set it up like it is shown above.
  2. Place the clamp with the boss head outside of the sand tray. Then put the 1 metre ruler into the boss head, so the ruler goes straight down to the bottom of the sand tray. Make sure the ruler is straight (at a 90 ̊ angle)image25.png
  3. This is how the experiment should take place, by holding the magnet at the height you wish to drop it, and they holding the nail in front of the magnet, so then the magnet and the nail attach,
  4. Then hold the ball bearing roughly 1cm away from the nail
  5. Drop the ball bearing 3 times for each height. Making sure you apply no pressure when dropping the ball bearing, to make it as fair as possible. Repeat this 3 times for 10
...read more.
































DATA ANAYLIS graphs. *

The first graph I did was on my first set of results, which I test each height 3 times, the graph showed the relationship between the depth of crater to the height it was dropped.

  • On my results table (depth of crater, height dropped from) which is on the back of the first graph, I circled two of my results which I feel are outliers, as they were way out of the other results that I had recorded.
  • I think the outliers were caused by either the person dropping the ball bearing applied some pressure, or it wasn’t dropped at the exact height, or the sand was unlevel. We didn’t include most of the outliers which I thought were extravagantly different to my other results, so it wouldn’t affect my overall results that much. I also didn’t include the extravagant outliers on my averages; otherwise i would get an invalided set of data.  
  • I think most my results on my first experiment were reliable, but to make it fairer dropping the ball at more than 3 times, it would have made it even more reliable, than it already was.

Graph #2 –

My second graph showed the same as the first (showed the relationship between the height of depth of crater to the height it was dropped) but with an improved method.

  • My second sets of results, in my opinion were a lot more reliable, as I tested it 5 times for each height, instead of 3 like the last time.
  • Therefore I didn’t find any outlier, meaning my results were very reliable, because we made sure we did the second set of results more accurately and took more time. Meaning reliable results.

Graph #3 –

This graph show the relationship between the crater depths and velocity,

  • I used the averages from my second sets of results as they were more accurate, meaning this graph would be more accurate.

Graph #4 -

This graph showed the relationship between the velocity and the height the ball bearing was dropped at.

  • This graph is very accurate, it goes up at a steady pace, and the distances between each reading are very similar.

Improvements to the method –

I think my method was very good, but we didn’t do a few things that we probably should of, like:

  • Every time you took the wax out of the crater, you should smooth down the sand, so lumps and bumps are at a minimum, making your results a lot more reliable.image22.pngimage28.png
  • Made sure the magnet that was attached to the nail which held the ball bearing was exactly at the right height. image23.pngimage02.png
...read more.



  • I think my results are quiet accurate, although I don’t think they are 100%, as a number of things could have happened, like what I mentioned above.
  • On my first set of results, I found two outliers, i thought they were both outliers because they were 0.4 below the lowest of the other results, this is probably because when it was dropped it was dropped slightly lower than they should have.

Most of my results don’t have a large range making them more accurate the biggest range I have is (without outliers) 0.3cm so a close range.

Height (m)

Crater depth (cm)





















I think reasons why they could have been inaccurate, are that the heights which they were dropped were not precise enough, and people many putting a little pressure on the ball bearing causing inaccurate results.

  • If I had more time I would have made sure everything was done very carefully and accurately, and there are a couple of outliers which if i had time would have tested them again.
  • I am fairly confident with my results, but like I have said I would have like to re-do some of the outliers I found.

I think my experiment was quiet successful, apart from the few outliers, which was probably due to pressure of dropping the ball bearings or it was not dropped at the correct height.


...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Electricity and Magnetism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Electricity and Magnetism essays

  1. Investigating the relationship between drop height and bounce height when a ball is dropped.

    One thing I would definitely change is the amount of experiments made for the experiment. After I have done my first three experiments I then was told that they are for the preliminary work and therefore couldn't use them in my official experiment and report.

  2. Investigate how mass affects the diameter of an impact crater.

    94 94 94 94 As can be seen from the table, there is not much difference between the crater sizes produced when the golf ball is dropped into different surfaces mediums. However if my intervals of height were higher then more disperse results would most likely be produced.

  1. The Bouncing Ball Experiment

    Unlike some other factors, the percentage error cannot reliably be found when it comes to human error. This is because it is impossible to know how long someone's reaction time was to read the measurement on the ruler when the ball stopped bouncing.

  2. Does the height of a crater affect the diameter of the crater produced?

    a greater force on the sand when it hits the sands surface. Scientific theory: When on object is in the air it has potential gravitational energy the higher up the object the more energy it gains. When a falling object hits the ground kinetic energy that it has is transferred

  1. physics of the bouncing ball

    The rounder ball actually bounces nearly 2cm higher. This however, I believe to be an anomaly. According to the laws of gravity and kinetic energy a ball should not have has much energy when its lower therefore should not bounce as high. Having said this, all the results at that particular height were similar giving an average above what I would of expected.

  2. The aim of this coursework is to investigate how the height in which the ...

    ( Refer to name of sources in bibliography Some factors can affect the way at which the ball bounces: - * The type (material) of ball used. A tennis ball for example would bounce higher than a hockey ball because it has more elasticity in it.

  1. Investigate how the height a ball is dropped from affects the re-bounce of it.

    density would mean that the one that was less dense would squash more, as that particles can be compressed further than a ball made of high density material. Furthermore, I know that gravity will be constant in this experiment as it is out of my power to change.

  2. The aim of this investigation is to investigate how varying the vertical height of ...

    when they thought the ball bearing reached the bottom of the tube. Unfortunately, this was very inaccurate, so the actual experiment was performed with only one person. Another change, which was made during the preliminary testing, was the repetition of each measurement ten times, as opposed to the original three, which served to make the experiment more reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work