Graph of results:
Conclusion:
Skill Area P : Planning experimental procedures:
The rate of reaction is directionally proportionate to the concentration of sodium thiosulphate solution . Also, the higher the concentration of sodium thiosulphate solution, the higher the rate of reaction therefore a faster rate of reaction.
Apparatus:
- Calcium carbonate chips ( approximately 10 grammes)
- 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 Molar solutions of hydrochloric acid.
- Distilled water
-
A syringe with a capacity of a 100 cm3.
- A flat bottomed conical flask to add the hydrochloric acid and the calcium carbonate together.
- 1pipette.
- 2 Measuring cylinders for the distilled water and hydrochloric acid.
- Weighing scale to weigh the calcium carbonate chips
- Clamp stand.
- Test - tubes which contain the varying concentrations of hydrochloric acid.
- Test - tube rack to hold the 4 test - tubes calcium carbonate.
- Rubber bung and glass tubing to prevent the leakage of carbon dioxide.
- Stopwatch to note the time.
Method:
In this experiment however I varied the concentration of the substance because temperature for example was hard to monitor due to it varying at regular intervals and also the experiment would take a long time to set up having a water - bath. Surface area would be virtually impossible to measure as the surface area of powdered calcium is too small. Also, it would be impossible to measure the surface area of the chips as they are of an irregular shape and so their surface area cannot be measured . Catalysts cannot be used as there is not a catalyst that affects the rate of this particular reaction.
The reactant which I will vary the concentration on is the hydrochloric acid. The method of varying the concentration would be to dilute one of the reactants namely the hydrochloric acid. With hydrochloric acid, it would be possible to dilute it as it is liquid itself. In this experiment 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 molar solutions of hydrochloric acid are used. This can be done by adding parts of distilled water to the 1 and 2 molar solutions of dilute hydrochloric acid by a measuring cylinder. This must be done accurately for a fair test. If not done accurately the rate of reaction would change quite drastically.
Approximately 10 grammes of calcium carbonate then should be weighed using a weighing scale. This is a huge access as there should be some left over or there would be an incomplete reaction. Once both of these are measured the syringe is clamped tightly and the hydrochloric acid is added to the calcium carbonate in a conical flask. The rubber bung is then sealed for the carbon dioxide not to escape. Before the experiment is done calculations must be made first by working out the amount of hydrochloric acid needed with varying concentrations. After this the carbon dioxide evolved must be calculated.
A stopwatch is used and the volume of carbon dioxide evolved is recorded every 30 seconds until there is a complete reaction. This procedure is repeated four times for each of the molar solutions of hydrochloric acid namely 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. After the results are taken down the rate of reaction for every 30 seconds is found for all four experiments by dividing 1 by the volume of carbon dioxide evolved. The overall rate for each of the four experiments are then worked out. For the section of Obtaining results two graphs are drawn to show how the time in seconds ( x axis ) affects the volume of carbon dioxide evolved ( y axis ) and how concentration ( x axis ) affects volume of carbon dioxide ( y axis). Then for the section of analyzing and drawing conclusions a graph is then drawn to show how varying concentration ( x axis ) affects rate ( y axis)
Precautions:
Safety glasses must be worn during the whole experiment as the hydrochloric acid is a volatile substance and spits when reacting with the calcium carbonate.
Skill Area P : Planning experimental procedures:
Diagram:
Predictions:
I predict that by doubling the concentration of hydrochloric acid (the reactant), it will double the rate of this reaction. So, the rate of reaction would be doubled, by doubling the concentration of one of the reactants. My prediction is that the rate of reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of the reactant (rate of reaction ∝ concentration of the reactant). If one doubles, the other will consequently double.
Calculations:
For my calculations I calculated the varying amounts of hydrochloric acid needed with varying concentrations ( 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 molar solutions ) in cubic centimetres to evolve carbon dioxide ( in cm3 ) in a syringe. Instead of using moles I used thousandths of a mole of hydrochloric acid as the carbon dioxide evolved would exceed the one hundred centimetre cubed syringe capacity. I also used a large access of calcium carbonate of approximately 10g to have some left over at the end of the experiment. To calculate the number of moles of hydrochloric acid needed to react with calcium carbonate I used this equation:
No moles of hydrochloric acid = Volume ( litres ) × Concentration ( moles / dm3 ).
0.002 Moles of HCl = Volume ( litres ) × 1 moles / dm3
Volume ( litres ) 0f HCl = 0.002 Moles
1 mole / dm3
Skill Area P : Planning experimental procedures
Volume ( litres ) of HCl = 0.002 litres = 2 cm3
However I shall multiply the volume of hydrochloric acid by four to create 8 cm3 instead of 2 cm3 which as it is an easier amount to use.
I had to find the volume of carbon dioxide evolved from reacting calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid .To make 8cm3 for a 0.5 Molar solution of Hydrochloric acid this formula is used:
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = Volume ( litres ) × Concentration ( moles / dm3 )
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.008 litres × 0.5 moles / dm3
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.004 Moles
The ratio of the reactants and products is seen below in the equation:
Chemical equation: CaCO3 + 2HCl (s) ⇒ CO2 (g) + CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l)
Ratio: 1 : 2 ⇒ 1 : 1 : 1
Molar ratio in thousandths: 0.002 : 0.004 ⇒ 0.002 : 0.002 : 0.002
The molar ratio in thousandths highlighted in red is the ratio which is needed. It shows when 0.004 Moles of Hydrochloric acid is used 0.002 Moles of Carbon dioxide is evolved. At room temperature and pressure ( RTP ) one mole of any gas will have a volume of 24 dm3 ( 1dm3 = 1 litre = 1000 cm3 ) and the following formula is used:
Volume of CO2 = Moles of gas × 24,000 cm3
Volume of CO2 = 0.002 × 24,000 cm3
Volume of CO2 = 48 cm3
Therefore the amount of carbon dioxide evolved is 48cm3 when 8cm3 of 0.5 Molar hydrochloric acid is used.
To make 8cm3 for a 1.0 Molar solution of Hydrochloric acid this formula is used:
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = Volume ( litres ) × Concentration ( moles / dm3 )
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.008 litres × 1.0 moles / dm3
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.008 Moles
The ratio of hydrochloric acid to carbon dioxide evolved for 1 molar solution of hydrochloric acid is seen below;
0.008 ⇒ 0.004
It shows when 0.008 Moles of Hydrochloric acid is used 0.004 Moles of Carbon dioxide is evolved.
Volume of CO2 = 0.004 × 24,000 cm3
Volume of CO2 = 96 cm3
Skill Area P : Planning experimental procedures:
Therefore the amount of carbon dioxide evolved is 96cm3 when 8cm3 of 1.0 Molar hydrochloric acid is used.
To make 8cm3 for a 1.5 Molar solution of Hydrochloric acid this formula is used:
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = Volume ( litres ) × Concentration ( moles / dm3 )
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.008 litres × 1.5 moles / dm3
No mole of Hydrochloric acid = 0.012 Moles
The ratio of hydrochloric acid to carbon dioxide evolved for 1 molar solution of hydrochloric acid is seen below;
0.012 ⇒ 0.006
It shows when 0.012 Moles of Hydrochloric acid is used 0.006 Moles of Carbon dioxide is evolved.
Volume of CO2 = 0.006 × 24,000 cm3
Volume of CO2 = 144 cm3
Therefore the amount of carbon dioxide evolved is 144cm3 when 8cm3 of 1.5 Molar hydrochloric acid is used.
To make 8cm3 for a 2.0 Molar solution of Hydrochloric acid this formula is used:
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = Volume ( litres ) × Concentration ( moles / dm3 )
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.008 litres × 2.0 moles / dm3
No moles of Hydrochloric acid = 0.016 Moles
The ratio of hydrochloric acid to carbon dioxide evolved for 1 molar solution of hydrochloric acid is seen below;
0.016 ⇒ 0.008
It shows when 0.012 Moles of Hydrochloric acid is used 0.006 Moles of Carbon dioxide is evolved.
Volume of CO2 = 0.008 × 24,000 cm3
Volume of CO2 = 192 cm3
Therefore the amount of carbon dioxide evolved is 192cm3 when 8cm3 of 2.0 Molar hydrochloric acid is used.
Skill Area O: Obtaining results:
The results for 0.5 Molar solution of hydrochloric acid with calcium carbonate:
Skill Area O: Obtaining results:
The results for 1.0 Molar solution of hydrochloric acid with calcium carbonate:
Skill Area O: Obtaining results:
The results for 1.5 Molar solution of hydrochloric acid with calcium carbonate:
Skill Area O: Obtaining results:
The results for 2.0 Molar solution of hydrochloric acid with calcium carbonate:
Section A : Analysing evidence and drawing conclusions
The graphs of time against volume were curved lines which produced increasing volumes for increasing concentrations. I found that when the concentration decreased, the gradient of the (lower concentration) graph decreased. I realised that there could be a relationship between the rate of reaction and the concentration. This then made me draw a graph of rate of reaction against concentration. In order to find the rate of reaction, I found the gradients of the graphs of volume of gas against time. I found the gradient by taking the volume of gas collected in the gas syringe after 60 seconds and divided it by the time, which was 60 seconds.
I then plotted a graph of rate of reaction (cm3/s) against concentration and drew a line of best fit. The points on the graph are of a high, strong and positive correlation. The graph of concentration against the rate of reaction between calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid is a straight line which nearly intersects the origin (0,0). The possible reasons the anomalies for this are listed in the evaluation under limitations. However, although the line does not pass through the centre of origin, I will take it as if it passes through the origin, as the line is very close to it. Also, the reason for it not going through the origin, could have been that there was a limitation of the apparatus.
Using the graph of concentration against the rate of reaction between calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid, I will now attempt to identify a relationship between the two. I have done this by doubling the values of the concentration and seeing what effect it has on the rate of reaction between calcium chloride and hydrochloride acid.
RATE OF REACTION = Volume Of Gas
(Gradient) Time
PART D :EVALUATION
Were my results reliable?
I think that my results are quite reliable, as I think that there is enough data to make rather a firm conclusion that the rate of reaction is directly proportional to the rate of reaction. However, the points in the graph of rate of reaction against concentration all had a constant error as either the rate of reaction was lower than what it was supposed to be, or the concentration was greater than it was supposed to be. I think, that in this case, the rate of reaction was lower than it was supposed to be. The theoretical calculations of the amount of carbon dioxide evolved was much less than the result that we had. This could have been due to many reasons, which are listed in the limitations.
Limitations
There were quite a few limitations in this investigation and they are listed below:-
- The main reason was that the carbon dioxide dissolved in the calcium chloride therefore the actual result was much less than the theoretical value.
- sometimes, the calcium carbonate did not mix with the hydrochloric acid properly, as it took a while for it to start reacting with the hydrochloric acid. This prevented it reacting with the hydrochloric acid as well as it should have, and so lowered the rate of reaction.
- although the chips had the same mass, they had different surface area. This did not make the investigation a fair test, as those chips with a greater surface area had a higher rate of reaction, and those chips with a lower surface area had a lower rate of reaction.
-
I could only measure the gas syringe to the nearest cm3 and I found this to be not a very high accuracy. This limited the accuracy of my results.
- the room temperature may not have been constant, causing the particles in the hydrochloric acid to have different kinetic energy, causing different rates.
- Not every single drop of the hydrochloric acid or the distilled water could be removed from the measuring cylinders, and some of it remained in the measuring cylinder.
- It was difficult to simultaneously look at the stop-watch to see the time and look at the gas syringe to see the volume of gas released. Time was wasted in reaction time and this would have affected the results slightly.
Further Improvements
- more duplicates could have been taken, so that my results would be more reliable.
- a burette could have been used to measure out the hydrochloric acid and the distilled water.
- more concentrations could have been used. By taking more concentrations, I would have more points on my final graph, leading to a greater accuracy.
- the room temperature could be measured every 15 minutes while doing the experiments to make sure that it does not vary too much.
this is a test area 19/3/2001
we are looking to see if the computer crashes, if so how long it takes it has now been on for half an hour and it is working very well
2.00pm started- time
time now 2.30pm
time now 2.45pm
timre 3.00pm
why is it not crashng, what is the matter time now is 3.15pm
I am going to switch off and start again.
restarted 3.30pm