• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rate of Reaction Investigation

Extracts from this document...


Rate of Reaction Investigation: Introduction: The rate of reaction measures how fast a chemical reaction occurs. You can change the rate of reaction in different ways such as changing the concentration of either the Sodium Thiosulphate Solution or the hydrochloric acid. Temperature can also be used to change the rate of reaction as the hotter the temperature is the faster the reaction occurs. I could also use a catalyst to provide a lower energy route for the reaction to occur. This would cause the speed of reaction to increase as it would increase the collisions. Although in this case I am not using a catalyst in my experiment so this means that I have controlled this key factor. In my experiment I am not using surface area as a facto but I do know that the small the particle the faster the reaction. This only applies when using solids in an experiment. Preliminary Work: Results Table These are the preliminary results. This was when we were experimenting and practising how to do the method. Whilst doing this we determined which dilution of STS and the acid worked the best and came up with reliable and accurate times. These below are the five best dilutions we came up with: Vol of Hydrochloric acid (cm�) ...read more.


Large measuring tube: this would be needed to contain the Sodium Thiosulphate solution. I choose a large tube because I need to add a lot of STS. I measured out the Thiosulphate solution before I added it to the conical flask. I also choose to use a different size beaker so it wouldn't be mixed up with the acid/water and cause an unfair test. If this happened it would either cause the reaction to start prematurely or it would dilute the water before added to the bottleneck beaker. Pen + Paper: I choose to choose these to record my results quicker rather then using a computer which takes a lot more time consuming. It's a much quicker and easier method than recording my results into a computer. Goggles: I had to use goggles to protect myself from the acid and STS. How did I make it a fair test? Throughout my experiment I used the same equipment every time I repeated my different solutions. I was also careful to measure out the correct amounts of Sodium Thiosulphate Solution, acid and water so I tried to get the same results as before. I was also careful not to use the same measuring tubes and beakers so that I wouldn't get the solutions mixed up and therefore it could start the reaction prematurely. ...read more.


89.82 3) 103.08 The time highlighted was the anomaly in the 4th dilution, this is because it is so far of the other times and therefore it is not a reliable result. I have also noticed that the more dilute the solution, the slower the reaction. Because of the anomalies we should ignore these as they could change the average time and therefore the reliability of the result. Also because we repeated the experiment we should make sure that the concentration of the acid is the same as this could change the time of reaction. This is because the errors bars are so small it shows that our results are reliable as there is less room for error. It is clear that the 3rd solution has a big error bar because the range of results is big. We chose the 2nd solution because the error bar is the smallest of them all which shows that it is the most reliable one of them all. We could have changed the beakers every time we carried out another solution so it the measurements would be accurate. Also we could have repeated our solutions more. For example we did 3 repeats in this experiment so we could have done 5 or 10 to make the results more reliable and accurate results. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The students response to the question, or rather investigation, was set out good, with necessary precautions taken into action and also explained the reasoning behind it. The student carried out preliminary tests before the actual test, making sure the results ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The students response to the question, or rather investigation, was set out good, with necessary precautions taken into action and also explained the reasoning behind it. The student carried out preliminary tests before the actual test, making sure the results were as accurate as possible both times, which is excellent practice for any chemical experiment. Another great thing is the inclusion of suggestions and improvements of what could have been better. However, in all chemical experiments, it is also good practice to give a prediction and explain the reasoning and theory behind everything. This coursework includes none of that, and whilst every procedure of the experiment is described explicitly, one of the most important features has been missed out which could mean a difference of grade. The coursework includes two diagrams at the bottom that have no caption or explanation showing it is unfinished which is not a good way of submitting coursework.

Level of analysis

I was disappointed to see that the student included no analysis whatsoever. The coursework was written more as an explanation and description rather than an analysis. As a student that has already partaken in many similar investigations, I have learnt that analysis is key, and although the student has included their final readings, there is no sign of a graph, neither any detailed breakdown of the results.

Quality of writing

This coursework in terms of spelling, grammar and punctuation was great with the exception of a few sentences that needed altering. The student used technical terms; however I noticed that the student abbreviated the word Sodium Thiosulphate as STS on several occasions. This is not a good habit in chemistry, and as the coursework was typed out on the computer, it would have been better if the whole word Sodium Thiosulphate was written, if not, then the formula Na2S2O3 would have sufficed.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by aranstar 14/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Chemistry Investigation on neutralisation reaction.

    5 star(s)

    0.05 moles produces 1018.5J 1 mole produces 1018.5/0.05=1018.5 x 20=20370J =20.37kJ So the heat of neutralisation per mol =20370J/mol =20.37kJ/mol Looking in the book "Chemistry Counts" by Graham Hill on page 190 he states that when hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide react the heat loss is 57.9kJ/mol of each reactant.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To investigate the effect of temperature on the rate of reaction

    4 star(s)

    Although the results are consistent and verify my prediction, they do not support my quantitative prediction. My numerical prediction was that as the temperature doubles, the rate of reaction would also double. For example, at 20oC, the rate of reaction was 0.47 Vm/sec-1, which doesn't double when the temperature was

  1. Indigestion Tablets Investigation

    The first graph shows the reactions of the tablet with acid of different temperatures. Each tablet (except that tested at 35oC) produced between 57cm3 and 65cm3, a range of just 8cm3. This supports my prediction that all the tablets would produce similar amounts of gas but the range is on the limits of acceptability (see 'Justification' for theory).

  2. Investigation to Determine the Composition of Commercial Vinegar.

    There are 2 results of 8.4 cm3 so this looks like a good result to use in the calculations. NaOH - 0.1M : 8.6cm3 CH3?OOH - ?M : 1.0cm3 CH3COOH (aq) + NaOH (aq) -> NaC2H3O2 (aq)+ H2O N.o mole of NaOH = MV 1000 = 0.1 * 8.4 1000

  1. Antacid Experiment.

    antacid: = 0.01044 moles divided by 1= this will equal 0.01044 dm cubed So you shall times this by 1000 to get it in cm cubed so it shall equal =10.4 4 cm cubed of HCl to neutralise the antacid. For Magnesium carbonate. Number of moles = 68 mg (0.068g)

  2. Recrystallization - choose the most appropriate solvent to obtain a successful recrystallization of benzoic ...

    0.778 1.4262 2.02 27.7 0.00 Dibutyl ether -98 142 0.769 1.3992 3.1 40.8 1.18 o -Dichlorobenzene -17 181 1.306 1.5514 9.93 35.9 2.27 1,2-Dichloroethane -36 84 1.253 1.4448 10.36 21 1.86 Dichloromethane -95 40 1.326 1.4241 8.93 16 1.55 Diethylamine -50 56 0.707 1.3864 3.6 24.3 0.92 Diethyl ether -117

  1. Why do penguins huddle to keep warm?

    Out of the four layers of test tubes only 4 tubes will need the temperature recorded. Thermometers will be used to check the temperature of the 4 selected tubes and at 2.5 minute intervals over the full 30 minutes, the temperature will be recorded for all 4 tubes.

  2. Precipitation of Salts & Identification of Unknown Solutions

    Since the majority of the precipitates produced are very similar in regards to appearances, I eliminated the cations which contradicted those for unknown A. For e.g., Cu2+, Ag+ and Fe3+, produced precipitates of different colours other than white when reacted with another salt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work