• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Cloning Human Beings Be Legallised In the United Kingdom?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SHOULD CLONING HUMAN BEINGS BE LEGALLISED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM? To give people the power to create carbon copies or identical twins of themselves has long been a science fiction nightmare. Today technology enables us to copy all the genetic code of a cell and to even transplant the nucleus, which holds the individuals entire genetic information, into another. This "cloning" process, though intellectually fascinating, is at present illegal in the United Kingdom and has long been a controversial topic. Despite the benefits I, like many, see cloning as a gross infringement of human rights, a manipulation of the human race and an attempt to equalise man with God. In this essay I will explore the implications and attractions cloning has on society and the medical world, in an attempt to answer the question: should cloning human beings be legalised in the United Kingdom? While the cloning of human beings is specifically outlawed in the United Kingdom under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in 1990, many other countries worldwide are already putting the process into action. In the United States the medical profession has benefited significantly from the uses of cloning, from mutations to manipulations. Scientists have discovered that the manipulation of genes used in this process can be used to conquer various genetic diseases and defects for generations to come. It is estimated that the average person carries about eight defective genes in them. These defective genes allow people to become sick when they would otherwise remain healthy. Scientists believe that cloning technology will one day make it possible to ensure that we no longer suffer because of our defective genes and could enable people to be completely resistant to diseases such as AIDS and Cancer. ...read more.

Middle

Secondly, how can we say that cloning is against God's intentions? What are God's intentions? Neither does the Bible state any direct opposition to cloning, nor do we have the right to imply these beliefs onto those whose religious morality is not even an issue. The beliefs of some people should not deprive others of the benefits of cloning. Certain religious beliefs within society, such as those who think that taking antibiotics or receiving blood transfusions is wrong, do not restrict those of other religions and beliefs from receiving benefits from them. Therefore why should religion dominate over decisions to legalise cloning in the Unites Kingdom when there are far greater medical and social advantages? On the other hand, there are a number of compelling arguments that state that the cloning of human beings is morally and ethically wrong. Scientists and ethics alike have debated for many years on this topic. While some believe cloning is beneficial towards medical research, recent studies show that cloning may result in harmful physical abnormalities and the possibility of death. Research suggests that through cloning, at best, only one attempt in every hundred would succeed, producing large numbers of stillbirths, miscarriages and deformed children. Half of the cloned children that will come to term will die late in pregnancy or soon after birth. Any of the few babies who do survive, would probably bear at least one distinct sign of their birth, including an extremely large navel. This would be caused by the oversized umbilical cord that develops during the pregnancies of clones. Clones also tend to suffer from "Large Offspring Syndrome", a term used to describe the development problems that strike about 50% of cloned babies after birth or during pregnancy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, many believe that the creation of babies through cloning is against God's will and against his true intentions. It is argued that God made man in his image with the intent for man to become one with God and to have almost as much knowledge and power. However, the Bible gives a substantial amount of evidence to oppose this statement. Firstly, people need to realise that our responsibility is to take care of God's world, including each other and not to manipulate each other in ways such as cloning. Secondly, we need to recognise that human life has a spiritual dimension and is therefore to be treated as a scared mystery, with the up most respect. Thirdly, we need to appreciate that if it was God's intent to allow man to create life then we should not abuse the gift of reproduction that is present within human nature by manipulating the process of reproduction to suit out needs. To conclude, though cloning could be used in various ways to benefit the lives of humans, I still believe it is dehumanising and is a disgusting attempt to become one with God. Due to the ethical and moral implications, cloning would be wrong for the human race to support or advocate. The sheer loss of life in humans is enough to prove that cloning would be a foolish endeavour whatever the cause. It is, however, inevitably going to take place for as long as the medical world continues to indoctrinate society and dominate over religion. I believe that if it does become legal, it could create a worldwide catastrophe that no one would be able to stop. The question we need to ask ourselves now is: will the human race be able to face the consequences of human cloning if it was made illegal? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evolution, what, and any evidence is there?

    4 star(s)

    They are very important as evidence for evolution. Almost all fossils found are of extinct species. This is more than 99% of all species that ever lived on earth.? ?How reliable is fossil evidence?? ?Conditions have to be just right for fossils to develop.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Cloning. Should it be banned? I will explain all the different types of cloning ...

    http://www.teachingsexualhealth.ca/media/pdf/IdenticalTwins.pdf Human cloning is not the only type of cloning; it can also be used in animals, as well as being a natural process used in bacteria, human reproduction and in some plants for asexual reproduction. They would use selective breeding to choose the plants with the most desirable features

  1. Peer reviewed

    Is Cloning Ethical?

    4 star(s)

    Probably the strongest argument for cloning is that as it progresses it may be possible to grow whole organs from embryos, which could be transplanted into the patient. This is preferable as there is no risk of rejection from the body as the DNA is identical (8,9,10).

  2. Peer reviewed

    Cellular Reproduction

    4 star(s)

    No vertebrates are capable of this, although it can be done synthetically by cloning. Asexual reproduction is often a second means of multiplying in organisms that ordinarily reproduce sexually. Sometimes that is the only way for that organism to reproduce.

  1. What is population genetics and how is it put to practical use?

    but they contribute directly to a change in the allele frequency in the next generation. There is a model for the time it takes for an allele to be fixed (p or q =1) and it is a powerful tool for population geneticists as it enables them to see what

  2. Analysis of Charles Darwin's Origin of the Species

    But if that same person were to tie it to a rock then that balloon is going nowhere. That is what Darwin has very effectively done in this section. He has taken his theory and tied it to fact. The last and what I feel to be the strongest argument

  1. Stem Cell Research

    My personal opinion is that we should focus less on the religious side and more on the ethical side, after all, this may be the 21st century, but there still needs to be a boundary. Stem cell research is an expensive type of research.

  2. Human Cloning.

    Why not go a step further and instead of eliminating the baby, make sure that there will be no defect to worry about. In addition, because there are many benefits to cloning and since not everyone believes in a god why should religion be used in making decisions for people where religious morality is not even an issue?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work