• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should we build more nuclear power stations?

Extracts from this document...


Should we build more nuclear power stations?

In this essay I am going to investigate into the topic of nuclear power. I am going to look at the advantages and disadvantages of using nuclear generated electricity as oppose to the burning of fossil fuels and the use of renewable energy. The issue of pollution caused by these sources of electricity will also be discussed in this essay and compared to each of the other sources. The reality is we need more generated electricity as you can see from the graph; the energy we need is rising and is expected to keep rising.


But at the same time, we must not generate more greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide. The over production of greenhouse gases is currently a very important issue because the already very high, and increasing levels of greenhouse gases is leading to global warming, I found this information from wikipedia,(www.wikipedia.com / Greenhouse Gases). Governments around the world have agreed to the Kyoto protocol which means that they have agreed to be working towards reducing carbon dioxide emissions and therefore lowering pollution because the temperatures are

...read more.


There is a huge amount of energy produced from a small amount of fuel.There is only a very small amount of waste produced.Nuclear power is reliable.Fossil fuels are running out in the near future (oil is predicted to run out around 2030), whereas uranium will not run out for a very long time.


        As with everything there are also many disadvantages of using nuclear power, but the question is, do the advantages overcome the disadvantages, so is nuclear power, overall, a good idea or bad?

  • Although not much waste is produced, the waste is highly toxic and must be sealed up properly and buried for many years i.e. 1000s of years, to allow the radiation to ‘leak away’ for the area to become safe again.
  • People do not want to live near a radioactive dumping ground because of the danger, and because of this house prices around these areas dramatically fall.
  • Although a lot of money has spent on safety, if it does go wrong then a nuclear accident can be a major disaster. E.g. at Chernobyl in Ukraine went into meltdown and caused major radiation all across Europe, some radioactive dust, called fallout, landed in the UK.
...read more.



The following are sites from which I have found research to use in this essay.

  • www.darvill.clara.net/alternerg/nuclear.htm
  • www.wikipedia.com
  • www.uspirg.org/home/reports/report-arhives/healthy-communities/the-high-cost-of-nuclear-power-why-maryland-cant-afford-a-new-reactor

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Is Nuclear Power the Solution to our Energy Problems?' Case Study

    4 star(s)

    This suggests that nuclear power plants may never be safe enough to solve our energy problems. The source was taken from eHow an online how-to guide whose articles and videos are created by freelancer journalists. eHow as often been criticised for producing low quality content designed specifically to rank highly in Google searches meaning that this source is unreliable.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Is nuclear power the future? Should we build more nuclear power stations in ...

    4 star(s)

    They are submerged in water which acts as a coolant. The reactor uses control rods which absorb neutrons: these are to control the rate of the reaction as they can be raised or lowered. The reaction releases heat energy: this is used to heat water into steam, which drives a turbine that generates electricity.

  1. Nuclear Power

    Alternatives to this include continuing to store the HLW waste above ground, dispose of it in the sea in special containers, burying it under the seabed, launching it into space. The problems of all of these are that they are very expensive and would cost billions of pounds to do

  2. research and report

    It is also why they are shiny. These free electrons oscillate together when light wave shine on it. Then radiate electromagnetically, this radiation from the oscillating electrons is the reflected light. In this situation, little of the incoming radiant energy is absorbed, it is just reradiated means it is reflected.

  1. Radiation: are mobile phones unsafe? Mobiles use electromagnetic radiation in order to send and ...

    The study included information on over 2,500 people. They found no link between the amount of mobile phone use, length of time since first use, lifetime years of use or number of calls made." If there were only a few studies proving a link to cancer, this would not be very reliable.

  2. Is Nuclear power a safe and sustainable way forward?

    Nuclear energy has always had its proponents, their ranks swollen now by people who dislike the technology but believe it may be essential. They point out that a reactor emits virtually no carbon dioxide (CO2), the main greenhouse gas released from human activities (though of course building the power station produces a lot of CO2).

  1. Smoke Alarms Assignment In this CDA I will be explaining how smoke alarms work, ...

    and very active alpha emitter (half life 432.2 years, 1167 million Bq per milligram). Time (years) Percent of radioactive particles 0 100 432.2 50 864.4 25 1296.6 12.5 1728.8 6.25 2161 3.125 2593.2 1.5625 3025.4 0.78125 3457.6 0.390625 Disposing smoke alarms Disposing smoke alarms can still be dangerous; this is


    I think this, because although they know it may be a little more expensive than other ways, it is worth it at the end because the coal emissions are much less which contribute less to global warming. However, on the other hand, the energy that is produced from the chain

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work