Temp labreport

Authors Avatar

How Temperature of HCL Effect Rate Of Hydrogen Produced

Aim:-

To determine how temperature affects the rate at which the reaction between Magnesium ribbon (Mg) and Hydrochloric acid (HCl) takes place.

Introduction:-

The rate of reaction can be affected by a number of factors: temperature, concentration, adding a catalyst and surface area. The one that I am going to be investigating and explaining about is temperature. Changes in temperature change the kinetic energy of the particles and hence the numbers of successful collisions with enough energy to break existing bonds and make products. For a reaction to take place, molecules must collide with each other. When they do so, they must possess enough energy to break the intermolecular bonds and hence, cause a reaction. The two theories that affect temperature and the rate of reaction are the kinetic theory and the collision theory. The kinetic theory clearly states that the positioning and movement of particles in a substance increases if the temperature increases. Therefore, increasing the temperature increases the energy between the particles and makes them move around a lot more and collide more often.

Join now!

Hypothesis: -

The rate of reaction has a positive relationship with the temperature of the Hydrochloric Acid.

Apparatus:-

1) Test tube

2) Rubber tube (a.k.a. delivery tube)

3) Measuring cylinder X2 [1-10ml, 1-100 ml]

4) Rubber Bung

5) Stopwatch

6) HCL - 150ml

7) 5x 3 cm of magnesium ribbon

8) Trough full of water

9) Beaker - 400ml

10) Water bath

11) Electric Thermometer

Method:-

  • Set up the apparatus as shown below. 
  • Fill the 400ml beaker with hot, room temp or cold water according to you. And use this beaker as a water ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

Punctuation, grammar and spelling all done to a high level. The format and tone of the experiment are perfect.

The hypothesis, background and aim are all explained very well and succinctly. They state which things they are going to make constant which is good because this will increase the reliability of the experiment as there are less factors which may confound the results. The method is outlined well and split into good clear stages so someone else would easily be able to repeat the experiment. The candidate includes a graph which clearly shows the trend they investigated. They could have drawn a line of best fit quite easily to show the trend better rather than just joining the points up. The evaluation and conclusion are both done to a high standard considering errors and possible improvements to the experiment.

The response to the question is done very well. The candidate explains the background to the experiment well by linking scientific theory to what they think will happen in the experiment. They also provide a very well though out conclusion and evaluation.