• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this investigation is to determine the relative atomic mass of Lithium by two different methods:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The aim of this investigation is to determine the relative atomic mass of Lithium by two different methods: * By measuring the volume of Hydrogen produced when Lithium is dissolved in water; * And by titrating the Lithium Hydroxide produced. As a basic safety measure, goggles should be worn during the entire experiment and titration. It is important not to handle the Lithium with your bare hands. Lithium reacts violently with water, which may be present on your hands. When Lithium reacts with water it forms Lithium Hydroxide (LiOH) solution, which is corrosive - this means it can cause burns. You should transport the Lithium using tongs or by placing it inside a dry container. It is important not to spill the Hydrochloric Acid when handling it as it also corrosive and can cause burns. ...read more.

Middle

calculate the number of HCL used in the titration. ii) Deduce the number of moles of LiOH used in the titration. iii) Calculate the number of moles of LiOH present in 100cm� of the solution from the first reaction. iv) Use this result and the original mass of Lithium to calculate the relative atomic mass of Lithium. i) 0.1 moles of HCL in 1000ml 0.0001 moles of HCL in 1ml 0.003225 moles of HCL in 32.25ml ? 0.003225 moles of HCL used ii) This means I used 0.003225 moles of Lithium. iii) 0.003225 x 4 (as 25cm� was used) = 0.0129 iv) Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium: Mr = mass � moles = 0.10 � 0.0129 = 7.75 Evaluation The dissolving of the Lithium in distilled water was more accurate than the titration. But together the two reactions were quite accurate, gaining relative atomic masses of 7.50 and 7.75. ...read more.

Conclusion

Like oil, the area around the Lithium, which had reacted with air, is making the weighing and experiment inaccurate. The only way to overcome this problem is to prepare the Lithium and do the experiment in a vacuum. You could also carry out the preparation in a controlled inert environment. * When you are placing the bung in the conical flask. In order to add the Lithium to the water, you have to remove the bung, and replace it as quickly as possible when the Lithium is in the flask. This method allows some Hydrogen to escape if the bung is not immediately replaced. This error can be highly influential over the final accuracy of the experiment. The only way to overcome this problem is to develop a system that allows you to place the Lithium in the water without letting any of the Hydrogen escape. Possibly, a way of placing the Lithium in the conical flask without it touching the water, and then by knocking the flask you release the Lithium into the water. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    I used 25cm3 of the solution from Method 1. Since 25cm3 fits into 100cm3 four times, to find the number of moles of lithium hydroxide present in 100cm3, I will need to multiply the number of moles of lithium hydroxide in 25cm3 by four: Number of moles of lithium hydroxide in 100cm3 = 1.867 x 10-3 moles x 4

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    there was random errors which affected the experiment and therefore affected the results. Also the normal mass of lithium is 7 but the result that I concluded was slightly bigger. The main systematic errors were as follows: - 1) Large measuring cylinder had an error of +/- 2 cm3 2)

  1. How much Iron (II) in 100 grams of Spinach Oleracea?

    The results should have shown that as the concentration of Iron (II) Ammonium Sulphate (aq) increased the voltage being passed between the solutions would have increased. This would have created a graph showing that an increase in concentration produces an increase in the voltage produced by the Electrochemical Cell.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    0.13 0 224 Evaluation (method 1):) In this experiment, I believe that there could have been many errors. The main sources of error in my opinion must be human and equipment error. For example a source of error is in measuring the amounts of the substances or materials.

  1. Determine the relative atomic mass of lithium.

    water and a salt is produced from the acid and alkaline, this is known as a neutralisation reaction. The formula for the reaction is shown below. Acid + Alkali Salt + Water. As it is a neutralisation reaction the outcome of the reaction would naturally be neither acidic or alkaline but neutral.

  2. Determining the relative atomic mass of lithium

    helped the reliability of the results. Procedural errors: Firstly the lithium. Exposure to oxygen in the air forms a layer of lithium oxide that coats the sample and when put in the water will affect the amount of lithium hydroxide produced.

  1. Determination Of The Atomic mass of Lithium.

    As for the result from method 2 the mass that I calculated was 7.42 which is quite far off from the real mass. * So I found that method 1 was 2.1% off the real atomic mass. Method 2 was 6.5% off the real atomic mass.

  2. Determination of the relative atomic mass of lithium

    = 6.14(3s.f) Method 2 Titration of LiOH (aq) with 0.100mol dm3 of HCl Lithium used Indicator added Titrate 0.1 mol HCl Results Lithium 173 cm3 1. Yes Yes 39.6mols 2. Yes Yes 39.8mols Average: 39.7mols Lithium 176 cm3 1. Yes Yes 40.2mol 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work