• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this piece of work is to investigate the factors that affect how fast a marble/ball bearing travels once it has travelled down the curtain rail.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Roller Ball Experiment Planning Aim: The aim of this piece of work is to investigate the factors that affect how fast a marble/ball bearing travels once it has travelled down the curtain rail. Factors: There are 5 main factors that affect the speed of the marble/ball bearing once it hits the ground after travelling down a curtain rail. * The surface may well change as it changes from the curtain rail to the floor. It could be smoother or rougher. If it's rougher the ball will slow down its speed quite quick due to friction whereas if it were smoother it would travel a further distance because it will have a higher speed. It will be easier to pass over the surface if it is smooth. * The marble/ball bearing itself could be of importance. Its weight and diameter could affect the speed. The bigger and heavier the ball the shorter the distance it will travel because the speed will be slower than with a small light ball which will travel faster. * Another point would be the height of the beginning of the track from the floor. The higher the track the faster the ball will travel when it comes off the end. However, if the track is very close to the floor the marble/ball bearing will not get very far due to low speed. ...read more.

Middle

In this case it should be 10cm, 20cm, 30cm, 40cm, and 50cm. The times need to be recorded from when the ball leaves the curtain rail to where the 3 metres is finished. All results must be recorded. Preliminary Experiment: In our preliminary experiment we found that Gravitational Potential Energy converts into Kinetic Energy once at the bottom. The marble/ball bearing gradually slowed down as it travelled along the floor. Another thing on the preliminary experiments was that once the ball had fell down the bottom and up the other side of the curtain rail and reversed in couldn't reach the same height as the start because the marble/ball bearing has lost most of its Gravitational Potential Energy and therefore can't turn it into Kinetic Energy anymore. The Obtaining Height from the floor Time Test 1 /secs Time Test 2 /secs Time Test 3 /secs Average Time/secs Speed m/s 2 20.00cm 1.72 1.03 1.65 1.66 1.20 40.00cm 1.13 1.16 1.09 1.12 1.79 60.00cm 0.91 0.85 0.90 0.89 2.25 80.00cm 0.78 0.82 0.81 0.80 2.50 100.00cm 0.47 0.59 0.66 0.57 3.51 Average Time (Secs) = All 20 cm results added / 3 (the number of results) Speed (m/s 2) = 2 metres / average time Analysis Test 1 Test 1 results showed me that the higher the curtain rail at the beginning point the faster the ball bearing/marble travelled over the 2 metres when it came off the curtain rail. ...read more.

Conclusion

They are two totally different surfaces and the floor could have had things on which would have caused more friction than it should have had. Unwanted sticky substances could have stuck onto the equipment, which might have slowed the ball bearing/marble down. However, as well as this the equipment used wasn't scientific enough so the time could have been .seconds out. In the place of this equipment a computer sensor could have been used, so when the ball bearing/marble passes through a strip sensor a stopwatch on the computer stops. It does this for every distance you want it to time for. There could be a few strip sensors on this route. This therefore doesn't need to be tested as many times because it is more thorough and accurate than by a hand stopwatch. These sets of results could be expanded so that the average is more of an exact average because with only three attempts and if one result turns out totally different to the rest the average could cause an anomaly. To improve the accuracy the stopwatch could be put to more decimal places. There could have been more tests at each height to get more of an average. You could use the full equation of Gravitational Potential Energy by weighing the ball bearing/marble before the investigation and putting it into the mass. This will give a more accurate answer that equals the Kinetic Energy. Justine Gray 10.3 Mr Bendall Physics CourseWork ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Electricity and Magnetism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Electricity and Magnetism essays

  1. Electromagnets - What factors affect strength of an electromagnet?

    This suggest that as the current flowing around the core increases, the number of aligned atoms increases and the stronger the magnetic field becomes, hence stronger the electromagnet. This is because, when a larger current is applied. This is because electrons behave like tiny magnets, because when they spin in the same direction, a magnetic field is generated.

  2. The Bouncing Ball Experiment

    5400 9600 This shows that my new theory on why the graph is a curve is probably true. These results clearly show that the higher the drop height, and the more energy the ball has to begin with, the more energy that is lost altogether.

  1. 'The Effect of heat on a Squash Ball'.

    Because some of its initial energy has been converted to heat and sound it will finish up with less gravitational energy than it started with i.e. the rebound height is less than the starting height. Evaluation I think that the method I chose to obtain evidence was successful.

  2. An investigation to find out how gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy.

    This implies that some of the kinetic energy has been lost. This statement is reasonable because in the calculation of the predicted gradient, factors such as friction and sound weren't considered. In practise, as the trolley rolled down the ramp, friction between the trolley's wheels and the ramp converted some of the gravitational potential energy into heat.

  1. What factors affect the gravitational potential energy of a trolley when it travels down ...

    trolley are all related and their combined product is the potential energy. So if the height is a smaller number than the potential energy will decrease and if the height was a bigger number the potential energy will increase. This means that the gravitational potential energy of an object is

  2. physics of the bouncing ball

    22 21 31 40 43 27 36 18 20 31 39 42 26 38 20 21 30 40 42 26 39 21 23 Average 30.8 39.4 42 27 37.6 20.4 21.4 40cm 25 31 32 21 30 14 24 26 34 34 22 31 15 23 26 33 35 21

  1. Does the height a ball is dropped from affect its efficiency?

    No ball can do this however; some balls are more efficient at not losing energy than others. When a ball is dropped it mainly transfers two types of energy, but also uses and wastes others. These are: * Gravitational potential energy * Kinetic energy * Elastic potential energy * Sound energy (wasted)

  2. Investigation on the factors that affect the bounce of a ball.

    In fact, the conversion of the potential energy results in the kinetic energy of motion until the bounce is over and this potential energy is regained as ball acquires the next position or height. However, on each bounce over a given surface energy of impact is transferred to the surface on which it bounces.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work