• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The aim of this piece of work is to investigate the factors that affect how fast a marble/ball bearing travels once it has travelled down the curtain rail.

Extracts from this document...


Roller Ball Experiment Planning Aim: The aim of this piece of work is to investigate the factors that affect how fast a marble/ball bearing travels once it has travelled down the curtain rail. Factors: There are 5 main factors that affect the speed of the marble/ball bearing once it hits the ground after travelling down a curtain rail. * The surface may well change as it changes from the curtain rail to the floor. It could be smoother or rougher. If it's rougher the ball will slow down its speed quite quick due to friction whereas if it were smoother it would travel a further distance because it will have a higher speed. It will be easier to pass over the surface if it is smooth. * The marble/ball bearing itself could be of importance. Its weight and diameter could affect the speed. The bigger and heavier the ball the shorter the distance it will travel because the speed will be slower than with a small light ball which will travel faster. * Another point would be the height of the beginning of the track from the floor. The higher the track the faster the ball will travel when it comes off the end. However, if the track is very close to the floor the marble/ball bearing will not get very far due to low speed. ...read more.


In this case it should be 10cm, 20cm, 30cm, 40cm, and 50cm. The times need to be recorded from when the ball leaves the curtain rail to where the 3 metres is finished. All results must be recorded. Preliminary Experiment: In our preliminary experiment we found that Gravitational Potential Energy converts into Kinetic Energy once at the bottom. The marble/ball bearing gradually slowed down as it travelled along the floor. Another thing on the preliminary experiments was that once the ball had fell down the bottom and up the other side of the curtain rail and reversed in couldn't reach the same height as the start because the marble/ball bearing has lost most of its Gravitational Potential Energy and therefore can't turn it into Kinetic Energy anymore. The Obtaining Height from the floor Time Test 1 /secs Time Test 2 /secs Time Test 3 /secs Average Time/secs Speed m/s 2 20.00cm 1.72 1.03 1.65 1.66 1.20 40.00cm 1.13 1.16 1.09 1.12 1.79 60.00cm 0.91 0.85 0.90 0.89 2.25 80.00cm 0.78 0.82 0.81 0.80 2.50 100.00cm 0.47 0.59 0.66 0.57 3.51 Average Time (Secs) = All 20 cm results added / 3 (the number of results) Speed (m/s 2) = 2 metres / average time Analysis Test 1 Test 1 results showed me that the higher the curtain rail at the beginning point the faster the ball bearing/marble travelled over the 2 metres when it came off the curtain rail. ...read more.


They are two totally different surfaces and the floor could have had things on which would have caused more friction than it should have had. Unwanted sticky substances could have stuck onto the equipment, which might have slowed the ball bearing/marble down. However, as well as this the equipment used wasn't scientific enough so the time could have been .seconds out. In the place of this equipment a computer sensor could have been used, so when the ball bearing/marble passes through a strip sensor a stopwatch on the computer stops. It does this for every distance you want it to time for. There could be a few strip sensors on this route. This therefore doesn't need to be tested as many times because it is more thorough and accurate than by a hand stopwatch. These sets of results could be expanded so that the average is more of an exact average because with only three attempts and if one result turns out totally different to the rest the average could cause an anomaly. To improve the accuracy the stopwatch could be put to more decimal places. There could have been more tests at each height to get more of an average. You could use the full equation of Gravitational Potential Energy by weighing the ball bearing/marble before the investigation and putting it into the mass. This will give a more accurate answer that equals the Kinetic Energy. Justine Gray 10.3 Mr Bendall Physics CourseWork ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Electricity and Magnetism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Electricity and Magnetism essays

  1. Electromagnets - What factors affect strength of an electromagnet?

    picked up: Average results 20 12 11 8 10.3 40 20 21 12 17.67 60 27 20 20 22.33 80 23 22 25 23.33 100 28 27 14 23 Experiment 2: How will applying different Current affect the strength of an electromagnet?

  2. Physics ball bearing investiagtion

    6- Put out the newspaper next to the sand tray, and light the candle. 7- Hold the candle above the crater; tilt it slightly so the wax dips into the crater that was created. Let the wax dip into the 3 craters you made, making sure that it fills up

  1. The Bouncing Ball Experiment

    to get completely accurate results in an experiment like this with the equipment we are provided with. Human experimental error is a problem because things like reaction times, eyesight and our own judgement cannot be changed and they do affect the end results quite considerably.

  2. Investigate the correlation between the height at which a ball is dropped and the ...

    from the ruler and make reading off the height it bounced to more difficult and inaccurate. To try and improve this, I would set up a clamp next to the metre rules, and clamp the ball at every height, put my eye to the correct height, and then simply loosen the clamp so the ball falls.

  1. physics of the bouncing ball

    16 11 17 9 11 Average 14.2 17.4 15.8 12.6 16.4 9 10.6 10cm 8 9 9 8 9 6 6 9 8 8 8 9 6 5 9 10 8 7 9 7 6 9 10 8 7 10 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 6 7 Average

  2. 'The Effect of heat on a Squash Ball'.

    As you can see there is an anomalous result of this may be due to misreading the thermometer or the measurements may be incorrect. All my results were interpreted on to graphs Analysis of results From the results of my experiment I drew graphs to show what had been obtained from the experiment more clearly.

  1. Investigating the factors that affect a bouncing ball.

    Height in cm Bounce height in cm 75 54 65 42 55 38 45 30 35 24 25 18 Safe test: It is very important to make sure that the test is as safe as possible. We are not really using equipment that can be dangerous, but things can always go wrong.

  2. Investigation on the factors that affect the bounce of a ball.

    The damping effect decreases until the ball attains the minimum potential energy. The damping effect influences the speed and so it tends to slow down the ball each time it impacts the surface. To observe this effect experiments were planned to drop large bouncy balls on different surfaces and to note the rebound heights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work