• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

The data that I am going to analyse has been obtained from an experiment performed in class, involving a buggy being rolled down a slope at an incline of 7.7o and passing through a light gate which I shall move down the ramp gradually.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Data Analysis Coursework

I believe that it is appropriate to begin this coursework with a quote: -

Every body continues in its state of rest or of uniform speed in a straight line unless it is compelled to change that state by forces acting on it.

Newton's First Law of Motion (Law of Inertia)

This quote, Newton’s first law of motion, is basically what I am trying to prove. The idea that an object will continue to move with the same speed unless some other force is acting on it. In this case, friction.

Account of the Experiment and Data Gained.

        The data that I am going to analyse has been obtained from an experiment performed in class, involving a buggy being rolled down a slope at an incline of 7.7o and passing through a light gate which I shall move down the ramp gradually. The diagram below (Fig 1)illustrating the experiment.

                    Fig 1

The experiment was performed for eight different range’s 20cm – 160cm, increasing in steps of 20cm with 3 attempts at each distance.

Plan of calculations

        

...read more.

Middle

1.84

1.673

1.84

1.84

1.83

1.837

To calculate the average acceleration, I used a = ΔV/ΔT

Fig 5

Average Acceleration

0

1.929

1.691

1.490

1.287

1.375

1.206

1.154

1.098

        As you can see. The average acceleration of the cart is way over the 1.3 ms-2 that I estimated above. This could possible be explained by the cart having been pushed and so has an initial velocity > 0.

        The most useful graph to plot will be a Velocity/time graph, (Graph 1), using this to calculate acceleration, from the acceleration values I will be able to work out the resistance value: -

(Resultant) F = Mg-Fr

(Since F= Ma)

Ma = Mg-Fr

By rearranging this formula to get the Frictional Force Fr.

 A Fr = Mg-Ma

        So by working out lots of acceleration values I will gain resistance values. The values have been taken from graph 9.

(Fig 6)

  1. Into formula A

Fr = (0.6678 x 9.8 x cos82.3) – 1.15 x 0.6678

Fr = 0.876 – 0.768

Fr = 0.108

2.  Into formula A

Fr = (0.6678 x 9.8 x cos82.3) – 0.2 x 0.6678

Fr = 0.876 – 0.134

Fr = 0.742

3.  Into formula A

Fr = (0.6678 x 9.8 x cos82.3) –0.08 x 0.6678

Fr = 0.876 – 0.053

Fr = 0.823

The next graph will be a Friction / Distance graph (Graph 2). From it I hope to establish if the frictional force is constant or changes.

The distances I will use will be - 20 cm, 60 cm, 100 cm and 140 cm. I shall use the data gained in fig 5 for this graph

Fig 7

a = ΔV/ΔT

For 20cm

a = 0.72 – 0/0.373 – 0

a = 1.929 ms-2

For 60 cm

a = 1.227/0.823

a = 1.490 ms-2

For 100 cm

a = 1.540/1.120

a = 1.375 ms-2

For 140 cm

a = 1.727/1.497

a = 1.154 ms-2

From this data I will calculate the expected friction using the formula: -

Ma = Mg-Fr

Fr = Mg – Ma

Av Acceleration

Mass

Gravity

Friction

0

0

0

0

1.929

0.6678

9.8

5.257

1.691

0.6678

9.8

5.415

1.490

0.6678

9.8

5.549

1.287

0.6678

9.8

5.685

1.375

0.6678

9.8

5.626

1.206

0.6678

9.8

5.739

1.154

0.6678

9.8

5.774

1.098

0.6678

9.8

5.811

...read more.

Conclusion

Av Velocity

Mass

0.720

0.6678

K = ½mv2

= ½ x 0.6678 x (0.72)2

= 0.173 J

The rest of the data follows suit: -

kinetic energy (J)

Av Velocity

Mass

0

0

0

0.173

0.720

0.6678

0.347

1.020

0.6678

0.502

1.227

0.6678

0.645

1.390

0.6678

0.792

1.540

0.6678

0.894

1.637

0.6678

0.995

1.727

0.6678

1.126

1.837

0.6678

Next I will work out gravitational potential energy

ΔGPE = MgΔh

To work out the height at each of the distance values I will use trigonometry.

Sinθ = a/h

Sin7.7o = a/0.2

a = 0.2 x sin7.7

a = 0.03

I shall use the distance values from the following points.

Here is a sample calculation. For a ramp length of 0.2 and height 0.03

GPE = 0.6544 x 9.8 x 0.3

= 1.309

Distance (M)

Mass (Kg)

Gravity

GPE

0

0

0

0

0.2

0.6544

9.8

1.309

0.4

0.6544

9.8

2.618

0.6

0.6544

9.8

3.927

0.8

0.6544

9.8

5.236

1

0.6544

9.8

6.544

1.2

0.6544

9.8

7.853

1.4

0.6544

9.8

9.162

1.8

0.6544

9.8

10.471

        Comparing Kinetic energy and gravitational potential, shows that a tiny proportion of energy is actually converted into kinetic energy as the table below and graph 3 shows: -

GPE

Kinetic Energy

0

0

1.283

0.173

2.565

0.347

3.848

0.502

5.130

0.645

6.413

0.792

7.696

0.894

8.978

0.995

10.261

1.126

Conclusion

        In conclusion the cart is extremely inefficient and looses lots of potential energy through friction. There were many problems with the data, there was flex in the ramp, the measurements for distance were very rough and we did not use a set square. The light gate was only lined up by eye and there were parallax errors in the time calculations.

        From the data I have plotted several graphs and have worked out what size component of the main force friction was using formulas. I attempted to work out the coefficient of friction but the value that I got was out by 0.024ms-2.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

    The experiment will then be repeated in the same way for the other readings. 12. The whole experiment will then be repeated in order to obtain an average. In the final experiment two of the gradient heights were changed, the first gradient was changed form 10cm to 15cm, as

  2. Investigation into Friction.

    5.0 5.328 53.28 22.0 22.0 22.00 6.0 6.328 63.28 23.0 24.5 23.75 7.0 7.328 73.28 25.0 25.0 25.00 Table 4. Observations When we did the experiment, we discovered that the force taken to make the masses move on the second reading on the smooth hardboard was greater than the preliminary experiment predicted.

  1. Free essay

    I am going to look at the conversation of energy in relation to certain ...

    The human body can be treated just like a machine as far as it's efficiency is concerned. We can estimate the amount of energy consumed by measuring the oxygen intake, since for sustained exercise oxygen intake is directly related to energy produced.

  2. Liquid Friction.

    The error bars in the graph show where the points could actually be, and give an idea of inaccuracy. Initial Evaluation Possible reasons why the coefficient of viscosity did not remain constant are: * Terminal velocity was not reached, stokes law uses the velocity over an infinite distance, which should be the terminal velocity of the object.

  1. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    roughly to the line of best fit whereas the last one is equal to the previous piece of tape before that. This could have been caused by a number of things such as something may have very slightly obstructed the trolley on its way down the ramp, or perhaps the

  2. Approximate Stopping Distances

    gets older their health starts to deteriorate and start to become slower than they used to be, this will increase the thinking distance because if it takes longer to process the information it will increase the reaction time whereas if someone is aged 16 to 19 years their reaction time

  1. Making Sense of Data.

    the card to pass through the light gate and the slope distance. Below are shown the formulae I will use. a = Acceleration v = Final Velocity u = Initial Velocity s = Distance t = Time 1. a = (v-u)/ t 2.

  2. Experimental Techniques; Analysis of Boundary Layer Data.

    80 0.08 1.5508 0.0515 2.450695582 14.4531533 0.018608435 90 0.09 1.5506 0.0383 2.44780599 14.4427672 0.01382895 100 0.1 1.5506 0.0382 2.44780599 14.4427672 0.013792843 From such data the boundary layer integral parameters can be determined using: Displacement thickness, Momentum Thickness , Shape Factor, The boundary layer thickness has been approximated here using the definition provided by F.M White.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work