• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Physics of a Cart Rolling along a Ramp

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Physics of a Cart Rolling along a Ramp

BY: Tahmid Zaman.

Group: Javeria, Nida

Table of Contents

  1. Purpose                                                                        3
  2. Materials                                                                        3        
  3. Diagram of Apparatus                                                        3
  4. Procedure                                                                        4
  5. Results                                                                        5
  1. Position –Time Data                                                5
  2. Isolated Charts                                                        6
  3. Position – Time Graph                                        6
  4. Average velocity – Average Time Graph                7
  1. Calculations                                                                7
  1. Theoretical                                                        7
  2. Experimental                                                        9
  1. Coefficient of Friction                                                        10
  2. Percentage Difference                                                        11
  3. Source of Errors                                                                11
  4. Discussions                                                                12
  5. Conclusions                                                                13
  1. Appendix i                Symbols                                                 13

Purpose:

The purpose of this lab was to calculate coefficient of rolling friction of a cart along a ramp using the theoretical acceleration using Newton’s 2nd Law and experimental acceleration using ticker-tape data analysis.

Materials:

  • Ticker-tape timer
  • Ticker-tape
  • Transparent tape
  • 0.839kg Cart with three wheels
  • 0.500kg weight
  • 0.200kg weight
  • A ramp approximately 2 m in length with a pulley attached at the end
  • Ruler – 1m
  • Two desks (labeled 1,2 according to the diagram)
  • 1 Approximately 2m long string

Diagram of Apparatus:

image00.png

Procedure:

  1. The apparatus was set up as shown on Figure 1.
  2. Firstly, the string was attached to the front of the cart and the other end of the string looped and suspended over the pulley.
  3. A long piece of ticker-tape was attached to the back end of the cart and pulled through the ticker-tape timer.
  4. The 200g or 0.200 kg weight was hooked on to the loop of the string, which was the falling end of the string.
  5. The 500g or 0.500 kg weight was placed on top of the 839g or 0.839 kg cart.
  6. Then everything was set with the 200g weight suspended and the cart held in position.
...read more.

Middle

10.30

0.1

1.05

103

66

1.1

61.8

11.50

0.1

1.15

115

72

1.2

73.3

12.40

0.1

1.25

124

78

1.3

85.7

13.50

0.1

1.35

135

84

1.4

99.2

14.40

0.1

1.45

144

90

1.5

113.6

15.20

0.1

1.55

152

96

1.6

128.8

15.20

0.1

1.65

152

102

1.7

144.0

8.20

0.1

1.75

82

108

1.8

152.2

2.50

0.1

1.85

25

114

1.9

154.7

Isolated Charts:

Time (s)

Position ∆d

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.8

0.2

2.6

0.3

5.3

0.4

9.0

0.5

13.7

0.6

19.4

0.7

26.0

0.8

33.6

0.9

42.0

1.0

51.5

1.1

61.8

1.2

73.3

1.3

85.7

1.4

99.2

1.5

113.6

1.6

128.8

1.7

144.0

1.8

152.2

1.9

154.7

tav (s)

vav (cm/s)

vav (m/s)

0.05

8

0.8

0.15

18

1.8

0.25

27

2.7

0.35

37

3.7

0.45

47

4.7

0.55

57

5.7

0.65

66

6.6

0.75

76

7.6

0.85

84

8.4

0.95

95

9.5

1.05

103

10.3

1.15

115

11.5

1.25

124

12.4

1.35

135

13.5

1.45

144

14.4

1.55

152

15.2

1.65

152

15.2

1.75

82

8.2

1.85

25

2.5

Position-Time Graph:

image01.png

Average Velocity – Average Time Graph:

image02.png

Calculations:

Theoretical:

Weight (0.200 kg)

Cart (1.339 kg)

Let “w” represent the Weight that was dropped

m w  = 0.200 kg

a = g = 9.80 m/s²

Fnet = ma

Replacing acceleration with gravity as it is falling

         Fnet  w = m w g – FT

                   FT = m w g – F

...read more.

Conclusion

        This experiment was not nearly as perfect as one could hope, but the surface of the ramp and the friction of the wheels were fairly low as a mass close to 13 % of the cart could exert such a high force and accelerate the at such a high rate. Even though the surface was very smooth, it came with some visible bumps and dents that could have caused increased friction. So, a smoother surface would allow more accuracy. All in all this experiment was a success as the surface was very with a very low coefficient of friction.

Conclusion:

After the experiment being carried out, the coefficient of friction was deduced at 0.015 derived from the experimental acceleration at 0.967 m/s². The theoretical acceleration at 1.274 m/s² was 27.4% more than that of the experimental acceleration.

Appendix i: Symbol

w (subscript)                Representation of the Weight dropped

c (subscript)                Representation of the Cart

m w                        Mass of weight, Kg

m c                        Mass of the cart, Kg

a                        Acceleration  m/s2

g                        Acceleration due to gravity m/s2

Δd                        Change in Position (displacement)

d                        Position (displacement)

Fnet                        Net force

Vavg                        Average Velocity

Tav                        Average Time

μ                        Coefficient of friction

FN                        Normal Force

Fg                        Force of Gravity

Ff r                        Force of Rolling Friction

Fapp                        Force Applied

FT                        Forceof Tension

Physics Lab #1 – Motion

BY: Tahmid Zaman

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigation into Friction.

    Rough hardboard Added mass / kg Total mass / kg Total weight / N Reading on force meter (F) / N 1st exp 2nd exp Average 1.0 1.328 13.28 5.0 4.5 4.75 2.0 2.328 23.28 8.0 8.5 8.25 3.0 3.328 33.28 13.0 13.5 13.25 4.0 4.328 43.28 18.0 18.0 18.00

  2. Ticker Tape

    Furthermore, when carrying out this experiment one vital safety aspect was missed out as the weight that was being released may have hurt someone if it landed on their foot. However, by placing empty cardboard box on the floor to catch the chain should ensure that no one's foot is at risk.

  1. The experiment consisted of recording the results of a small toy car being allowed ...

    the car lands, and you can see I have done this on the graph. This gives us a value for the landing time of 2.65 seconds The Last Point You may have noticed that so far I have not explained why there is an extra point at the end of the graph.

  2. Hooke's Law Lab

    Also, the second spring gives more accurate results than the first spring since the graph plotted for the second set of results is a uniform straight line graph with almost all of the points falling in the line of best fit.

  1. Investigation into factors affecting the speed of a car rolling down a ramp

    With this in mind, if the height of the ramp is then increased to 2x then the GPE will be doubled, and so the kinetic energy will double. In addition to this I can make a prediction mathematically using the following formula: GPE = m x g x h KE = 1/2 x m x v2 ?

  2. Investigating the Physics of Bunjee Jumping

    In addition the assumption was made that the masses were according to what was labelled on each mass, and was not measured to certify that each mass was accurate to their label. However, if the masses labelled were inaccurate, it would probably have little impact or no relevancy as it would most likely be incorrect by a minor amount.

  1. Mechanics - "loop the loop"

    From the above diagram you can see that there are two forces acting on it. Because it is still in contact with the surface then there must be a reaction force, therefore R>0. We know that the object is in circular motion therefore there must be a resultant force and

  2. Experimental Techniques; Analysis of Boundary Layer Data.

    0 -0.0059094 1.5047 0.00565 1.0601 1 10 0 0 0 0 1.6719 0.005635 1.07618 Bulk Velocity, U0 = 2.44780599 0.99U0 = 2.42332793 Boundary Layer Thickness = 59.81390261 Displacement Thickness ?* = 10.80487536 mm Momentum Thickness ??? 7.500002088 mm Shape Factor H = 1.440649647 To find the correct logarithmic velocity profile

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work