• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The potential benefits and risks of genetically modifying food.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this essay I will be looking at the potential benefits and risks of Genetically Modifying Food. The idea of genetically modifying food is, and has been, a subject of great debate for quite a while now, and all over the world GM food is available to buy. The argument for and against GM good is split into 4 main groups, the group that think GM is the way forward, and the way to reduce famine, increase health etc, the group that thinks that GM food is the way forward because it increases efficiency, i.e. no pesticides needed, faster growing, better yields etc, then there are the 2 groups against GM foods, those who fear GM foods to be damaging, and that we should only eat organic, and then there are those who believe that GM foods is playing god. ...read more.

Middle

93 percent of the cases studied, the actual goal of genetically modifying food is maximizing profits from industrial-scale food production and processing. Even companies that are against the idea of genetic engineering in foods have benefited from the GM debate. For example families concerned about their health and environment have, over the last few years started to turn to organic food as a safer alternative to GM (or even just food that could be GM). From its humble origins as a small niche market, organic food has grown into an increasingly large industry. (www.greenpeace.org 1997) Some major advantages to genetically modifying foods is the ability to make agriculture cheaper in the long term, i.e., fast growing plants, plants that develop seeds quicker, have larger yields, contain pesticides, store for longer, or need less water. These modifications could all be good, for example, having plants containing their own pesticides would decrease the amount of chemical pesticides needed to be used on a crop, this is much better for the environment. ...read more.

Conclusion

herbicide tolerance, modified starch types Although this kind of genetic engineering of plants may have side affects to the surrounding environment, is also possible to use genetic engineering to increase nutritional value of foods, for example, increase the amount of a vitamin created in a plant. This is useful because increasingly, young children are eating less and less 'good' food, and it is important for children to get as much nutrition as they can. Therefore, if food was more nutritious, people would need to eat less of it to get the same amount of nutrients. (Biological Sciences Review) In conclusion it is safe to say that at present the benefits of genetically modifying food out weigh the risks, however the technology is in its infancy and future detrimental effects of eating modified foods are still unclear, it is also hard to predict what affects GM crops could have on the environment once the modified genes are released into the gene-pool. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The response to the question is done well and the focus of the essay is also very well correlated with the question. Organic food however, is on the decline, so the candidate should consider this in their analysis of the ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The response to the question is done well and the focus of the essay is also very well correlated with the question. Organic food however, is on the decline, so the candidate should consider this in their analysis of the foods.

Level of analysis

The candidate introduces the topic well, but they should have provided an explanation for what GM food is to show their understanding of the topic. The candidate accurately examined four different groups and their approaches to GM foods, although the way they mention the topic is quite casual so I would change the tone of the essay to suit the scientific essay format. The conclusion is adequate because it ties up loose ends in the essay and makes a valid conclusion based on the evidence presented. The candidate shows good depth of scientific research throughout the essay.

Quality of writing

The candidate repeats their title on the second page, which shouldn't be done because it looks untidy. Punctuation, grammar and spelling all done to a good level.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by skatealexia 30/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluating the risks and benefits of GM crops.

    4 star(s)

    Supporters of GM crops say that the benefits of them are aimed at consumers, producers, and developing countries. One of the most documented benefits of GM crops is the ability to create herbicides that are harmless to crops and crops that have been genetically modified to tolerant the herbicide.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Research in Genetic Engineering Should Be Halted. Discuss

    3 star(s)

    This caused many insurance companies to try to screen clients for HIV and base the insurance coverage on that information. This dilemma is thus posed: If people are going to undergo predictive screening, both to advance knowledge in the field and to find out information of potential value to their

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Cloning. Should it be banned? I will explain all the different types of cloning ...

    The 5 cloned embryos, created in Stemagen Corporation lab, in La Jolla, were destroyed. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloning#Human_cloning The main point here is that human reproductive cloning is possible, yet the public are not ready for it and do not want it, but this argument will still go on for many years.

  2. Genetically Modified Food. The Future?

    Less farmland is available due to commercialization and soil nutrient atrophy. This doesn't mean that other plots couldn't be converted into farmland. "Farm acreage could increase by 10% over the next 40 years... ...In many cases it would mean destroying forests or other sensitive habitats...

  1. Genetically engineered food, also known as Genetically Modified or GM food, is food that ...

    Also, GM crops could prove toxic to an organism in the environment, leading to reduced numbers or extinction of that organism. Given that some GM foods are modified using bacteria and viruses, there is a fear that we will see the emergence of new diseases.

  2. Is cloning the way of the future

    Dolly the Sheep: Dolly the sheep was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult cell, and successfully. Dolly was born on 5 July 1996 at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh. She was cloned by scientists replaced the nucleus of the egg cell with the nucleus from the parent cell - in Dolly's case, an udder cell.

  1. Genetic Engineering, Friend or Foe?

    * Agriculture is already too technological. This will only make it worse. * They're better ways to improve resistance and reduce chemicals on the land. Do we have a real say in what's going on? * Labelling measures are inadequate, and unjust towards those who object.

  2. Evolution Revision Notes

    in soil that is low in nitrate or magnesium ions, while the other is growing in the sun, or in soil that is rich in ions. Such differences are the result of environmental variation. Differences like these arise during an individual?s lifetime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work