• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To determine the value of Faraday constant (quantity of electricity per mole) by using electrolysis of Copper.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1) Title: QN1 A Quantitative study of electrolysis 2) Aim/Objective: To determine the value of Faraday constant (quantity of electricity per mole) by using electrolysis of Copper. 3) Results: Before electrolysis: Weight of cathode = 2.164 g Weight of anode = 2.502 g After electrolysis: Weight of cathode = 2.237 g Weight of anode = 2.435 g Time of electrolysis = 20 minutes = 1200 seconds Ammeter reading = 0.19A 4) Calculation/interpretation: The equation of the electrolysis reaction at the cathode: Cu2+(aq.) + 2e- � Cu(s.) Gain in weight of cathode = 2.237g - 2.164g = 0.073 g Loss in weight of anode = 2.520 - 2.435g = 0.085 g No. of moles of loss in cupper anode = 0.085 / 63.5 = 0.00134 mol Quantity of electricity required = 0.00134 mol * 2 = 0.00268 mol Quantity of electricity supplied = 1200 * 0.19 = 228C Faraday Constant = quantity of electricity / no. ...read more.

Middle

ions might not be very soluble at that moment. After that, the copper electrodes were rinsed with propanone and heated under a Bunsen flame. Since propanone can remove grease or oil, this treatment could leash off the sebum which we have left on the electrodes when transferring them. Of course, when rinsing them by propanone, a pairs of forceps was used. After rinsing, the copper electrodes were warmed high on a Bunsen flame to evaporate propanone more quickly. However, they should be placed high above the Bunsen flame because propanone is flammable and a Bunsen flame can oxidize the copper plate, forming copper (II) oxide on their surface, which will finally lead to a heavier weight and smaller Faraday Constant. The value of the Faraday Constant was calculated to be smaller than the literature one (96500 Cmol-1) due to a number of errors. For instance, it was inevitable that the electricity supply was not exactly 0.19A in the time interval 20 minutes. ...read more.

Conclusion

This can explain why the gain in weight of the cathode and the loss in weight in the anode were not the same. So if the gain in weight of the cathode was taken into consideration, the calculated value of the Faraday Constant would be larger. After finding out the value of the Faraday Constant, the thickness of the metal plating can also be calculated. According to the formulae Density = Mass / Volume and Volume = Thickness * Surface Area, since the density of copper (8920kgm3), the surface area, the mass of copper formed are all known, the thickness of the plating can be known. It is actually calculated by: Mass / Density / Surface area. Such electrolysis process performed in this experiment is useful in electro-plating. It can plate a certain object by placing it on the cathode, and the metal to be plated onto the object will be put on the anode. 6) Conclusion: The Faraday constant was calculated to be 161000 C mol-1. ?? ?? ?? ?? Yu Wing Yee 6A(30) - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere essays

  1. The Electrolysis Of Copper (ii) Sulphate Solution Using Copper Electrodes

    - 2electrons --> Cu2+ (aq) 193000C 64g So; 193000C deposits 64g 300Y Coulombs deposits 64 x 300Y / 193000 =19200Y / 193000 = Y x 19200 / 193000 With a current of 0.35A: Mass deposited = 0.35 x 19200 / 193000 = 0.0348g With a current of 0.60A: Mass deposited

  2. Investigate the factors that affect the mass of Copper deposited on the Copper Cathode ...

    sulphate solution to be used again. The repetition of using the same anode and copper (11) sulphate solution could have led to the anode becoming very thin and even falling apart and the copper (11) sulphate solution having excess amounts of copper floating around in it.

  1. Investigating how the amount of copper affects the mass of the cathode

    I had to readjust the rheostat to 0.8 amps. In addition, the last result that was taken should have been higher than what we gained before because if the amount of current was the highest amount, why did the cathode not gain on the most mass so far? According to my prediction the amount of reactivity, taking place should

  2. An experiment to show how electroplating using copper electrodes.

    When the temperature is low, there is less energy available for the copper ions to move from the anode to the cathode. Prediction I predict that the outcome to be is that as the amount of input increases, the amount of copper being gained increases.

  1. Investigation into Electrolysis

    Aim: To demonstrate the variables affecting competing electrode reactions in electrolysis, particularly the electroplating of metals. To investigate the effect of Potassium Nitrate on the electroplating process. Hypothesis: In those reactions where plating is successful, that is, that the metal anode will be oxidized into solution and reduced out of

  2. Electrolytic wastewater treatment apparatus

    [0006] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) provides a set of standard methods to determine COD in aqueous effluents: 1 Test Method USEPA Document Source Chemical Oxygen Demand - 0410.4 600/4-79-020 Colorimetric Chemical Oxygen Demand - 0410.4 600/R-93-100 Semi-Automated Colorimetric Chemical Oxygen Demand - 0410.3 600/4-79-020 Titrimetric, High Level

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work