• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the height dropped from a crater and the affect in the size of a crater due to a meteorite hitting the Earth.

Extracts from this document...


Crater Investigation

Aim: To investigate the height dropped from a crater and the affect in the size of a crater due to a meteorite hitting the Earth.




  • Clamp
  • Base
  • Stand
  • Ruler
  • Wooden ball weighing 35.4g
  • Container of flour
  • Cocktail stick (for calibrating readings)

Preliminary Work

Height Dropped:

A 24.5g ball bearing was dropped from three points using the ruler.

Height Dropped (cm)

Depth of Crater (cm)







Mass of Ball:

A table tennis ball of mass 3.5g was dropped from 50 cm. The weight was changed by adding iron balls each time.

Mass of ball (g)

Depth of Crater (cm)







Material Used:

A ball bearing of mass 509.7g was dropped from 75cm in different materials.

Material used

Depth of Crater (cm)









I have decided to investigate height dropped because it is the most reliable variable in order to obtain accurate, varied results and maintain a fair test.


  1. The equipment was set up as shown in the diagram above.
  2. A suitable sized wooden ball of mass 35.4g was chosen to be dropped.
  3. The flour in the container was flattened out.
  4. A height was selected on the ruler and recorded.
  5. The ball was then dropped from this height into the container.
...read more.


Fair Test:

In order to have a fair test only the height from which the ball was dropped was altered. The mass of the ball was kept constant and the flour was shaken within the container to as near a horizontal level as possible so that it did not affect the next result by causing the depth of the crater to be changed. A fair test is important to acquire precise results. In addition, I checked that the ruler was always vertical and I also made sure the calibrating stick was at the lowest point at each crater.


The heights dropped ranged from 15 cm to 115 cm adding 15cm in height for each time for the next reading. The number of readings taken was 7 because this is an appropriate number of readings to be able to draw a precise graph and a good range of results. Four repeat readings were taken for each height to obtain an accurate average to be used for the graph. As shown in the preliminary work, a large range of heights is required to get a satisfactory range of results. The calibrating stick was marked in cm and mm to obtain accurate results.

Scientific Knowledge:

        As the 35.4g ball is raised above the flour, an upward vertical force equal to 0.354N must be applied to the object in order to lift it.

...read more.



        There are many ways in which the investigation could be improved. Individual results could be made more accurate by using a more reliable source other than a hand to drop the ball from the height. The ball could be rolled off a platform at the different heights. The reliability of the data set could be improved by having a bigger range of results and more repeat readings measured using a more accurate calibration material so that results may be more accurate. The ball could be dropped with different force to see how this would change the results, the effect of speed when hitting the flour. However this may be difficult to carry out as it would have to be a fair test and to keep the force applied the same for each reading it would be difficult.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigate the size of craters in sand when a marble is dropped into the ...

    If my results were completely accurate this would not happen. The graph I drew showing the averages of my three experiments came out very well. The curve is quite steep. The gradient of the curve changes constantly but causes the line to be steep.

  2. Squash Ball and Temperature Investigation

    5 28 75 28 28 28 28 28 140 140 ? 5 28 90 28 29 28 27 28 140 140 ? 5 28 From the results, it is evident that at 60 seconds the height of the balls bounce remains constant after the ball has been heated.

  1. How does the drop height of a small and a large marble affect the ...

    Variables: Dependent: * Height Independent: * Diameter of the crater Controlled: * The size of the marble * Gravity * Flatness of the sand Scientific Knowledge: As the size and speed determine the size of the crater created by the impact of the marbles then the following formula must apply

  2. Investigate the effects of an asteroid impact on Earth through a small-scale simulation.

    This shall provide a reference point to compare against after the ball is dropped. The setsquare shall then be held square against the ruler at the required height for the drop. (The right-angled setsquare is being used to avoid parallax error in the measuring of the heights from the sand and the point the ball is being dropped from.)

  1. To find out how the height from which a marble is dropped affects the ...

    Distance across the crater with a ruler and record in table to the nearest mm Diagram:- Pre-Test:- I am going to do a pre-test to check that there are no flaws in my method, and that I can measure and record the results accurately.

  2. Investigation into the range of a ski jump

    points 1 and 2. The results prove that the derived equation is correct and that the range of a ball does depend mostly on the height it is dropped from and the height the ball leaves the ramp. The formula (R�=4 x h1 x h2)

  1. The determination of the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the earth, ...

    The difference between the upper limit and lower limit is 0.11ms-�. This is 0.11/9.87 x 100 = 1.11%. This suggests that there is not a great uncertainty in the data. As far as the number of significant figures the final value of g can be determined to, the limitations of

  2. Aim To see how the efficiency of a bouncing ball ...

    Drop Height (m) 1st Reading (m) 2nd Reading (m) Average Bounce Height (m) 0.2 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.6 0.49 0.485 0.48 1 0.66 0.69 0.675 Conclusion There were no anomalous results. I would say that my results are probably quite accurate because we made extra care to make the trial experiment fair, and my results turned out how I expected they would.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work