• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James De Souza        Science 1        B.E.Tyler

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Viscosity :- The viscosity of a fluid is a measure of its resistance to flow. Viscous forces acting on bodies moving through a fluid and in fluids moving through pipes and channels. The pressure in a fluid decreases where the speed increases.

Stokes Law :-  An equation relating the terminal settling velocity of a smooth, rigid sphere in a viscous fluid of known density and viscosity to the diameter of the sphere when subjected to a known force field. It is used in the particle-size analysis of soils by the pipette, hydrometer, or centrifuge methods. The equation is:

V = (2gr²)(d1-d2)/9µ

where

V = velocity of fall (cm sec-¹),

g = acceleration of gravity (cm sec-²),

r = "equivalent" radius of particle (cm),

dl = density of particle (g cm -³),

d2 = density of medium (g cm-³), and

µ = viscosity of medium (dyne sec cm-²).

A falling object has an acceleration equal to g, provided air resistance is negligible. If air resistance is significant, the force due to air resistance drags on the object. This drag force increases as the object speeds up, until the force becomes equal and opposite to its weight.

...read more.

Middle


0.20         1.03         0.97         1.10                 1.04                 2.74                         2.63


Experiment 2
Mass (N) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s)   Average Time (s)    Average Velocity (m/s)*  Average Acceleration (m/s2)…
0.02         2.78         2.32         3.28               2.79                        1.02                         0.37
0.04         2.18         2.30         1.67               2.05                 1.39                         0.68
0.06         1.57         1.40         1.50               1.49                 1.91                         1.28
0.08         1.09         1.14         1.25               1.16                 2.46                         2.12
0.10         1.19         1.31         1.29               1.26                 2.26                         1.79
0.12         1.13         1.20         1.14               1.16                        2.46                         2.12
0.14         1.09         1.07         1.13               1.10                        2.59                         2.35
0.16         0.91         1.08         1.10               1.03                        2.77                         2.69
0.18         0.88         1.01         1.06               0.98                        2.91                         2.97
0.20         0.93         0.97         1.00               0.97                        2.94                         3.03


Averages Over Experiments 1 and 2
Mass (N)         Average Time (s)

...read more.

Conclusion


ii)         v2 = u2 + 2as
iii)         s = (u + v)
                       2

Unfortunately, without knowledge of the terminal velocity, or the real acceleration, this can’t be done properly. However, to give a rough idea of how it could be used, the test is detailed below:

In an attempt to acquire the most accurate results possible, albeit a futile attempt, the third formula will be used and the average velocity used in place of the terminal velocity.

1) To begin with, try the first set of results, i.e. a mass of 0.02 N:

s =
(0 + 0.93)
           2
\ s = 0.465

Quite obviously, this distance is nowhere near the actual distance of 2.85m but, of course, it shouldn’t be because with such a small mass, air resistance is still playing a major part.

2) Next, the results for a mass of 0.12 N will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.32)
            2
\ s = 1.16

Again, this is nowhere near the actual distance but it is getting closer.

3) Lastly, the results for the last mass, 0.20 N, will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.94)
             2
\ s = 1.47

It would appear then, in conclusion, that this test was a failure. The question is, though, is this because of the fact that the final velocity is obviously false, or because this is not the way to go about finding the “terminal” terminal velocity, which of course may not exist. In all likelihood, however, looking at the results, it does exist but without the actual values for the final, or terminal, velocity, it is difficult to prove its existence.

image02.pngimage00.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigating the effect of mass on a parachute

    If I had kept increasing 2g of plastercene, I am certain that the curve on the graph would straighten out. After doing this experiment, it is obvious that the initial prediction I made was indeed correct. I think that my prediction was particularly right because I used the idea that

  2. Pressure distribution over a symmetrical airfoil.

    Where p? is the static pressure in the free stream and U is the velocity. The coefficients may be determined directly from the monometer reading as follows: Cp = (h-hs) / (ha-hs) Where h is the reading for the tapping, hs is the static pressure in the tunnel and ha is the atmospheric pressure.

  1. To determine the relationship between mass and acceleration when force is kept constant.

    is, the less air resistance there is as compared to the force of the accelerating object. For example: If you used a heavier metal, for example lead, instead of other stuff like plastic, then it would be relatively smaller (if both have same mass).

  2. The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

    I have also tried to find out whether the sphere accelerates whilst traveling through the syrup. In order to do this I have videoed the sphere was traveling through the syrup at 150, and then I have investigated how long it will take for the sphere to travel every ten centimeters.

  1. Practical Investigation Into Viscosity

    This method gives an enormous range of measurements; the largest to smallest readings give us a ration of about a billion to one. Noting the temperature is most important when taking such a measurement because of the great change even a small change in temperature can cause.

  2. Practical investigation into Viscosity in liquids (Stokes Law).

    40-60 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.203 50-70 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.203 Large Distance Timed (cm) Time taken(s) for ball bearing to pass through distance measured 1 2 3 Average 0-20 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.273 10-30. 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.217 20-40 0.20 0.21 0.20 0.203 30-50 0.20 0.19 0.20 0.197 40-60 0.20

  1. Investigation into the effect of temperature on viscosity

    A suitable mass of ball also needed to be found as the greater the mass the faster the ball fell, therefore adding to the inaccuracies of timing caused by the slow human reaction. A ball of mass 1.5g and with a diameter of 7.13mm was decided upon An appropriate drop distance was also found.

  2. The Area of a Parachute Compared To Its Rate of Descent

    Frequency Width Height 2.86 2 2 1.43 2.87 1 1 2.87 2.88 5 5 0.58 2.93 1 1 2.93 2.97 2 2 1.48 3.04 1 1 3.04 3.06 2 2 1.53 3.09 1 1 3.09 3.24 1 1 3.24 3.28 1 1 3.28 3.32 1 1 3.32 Anomalous Results In this experiment, I have found 1 set of anomalous results.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work