• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James De Souza        Science 1        B.E.Tyler

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Viscosity :- The viscosity of a fluid is a measure of its resistance to flow. Viscous forces acting on bodies moving through a fluid and in fluids moving through pipes and channels. The pressure in a fluid decreases where the speed increases.

Stokes Law :-  An equation relating the terminal settling velocity of a smooth, rigid sphere in a viscous fluid of known density and viscosity to the diameter of the sphere when subjected to a known force field. It is used in the particle-size analysis of soils by the pipette, hydrometer, or centrifuge methods. The equation is:

V = (2gr²)(d1-d2)/9µ

where

V = velocity of fall (cm sec-¹),

g = acceleration of gravity (cm sec-²),

r = "equivalent" radius of particle (cm),

dl = density of particle (g cm -³),

d2 = density of medium (g cm-³), and

µ = viscosity of medium (dyne sec cm-²).

A falling object has an acceleration equal to g, provided air resistance is negligible. If air resistance is significant, the force due to air resistance drags on the object. This drag force increases as the object speeds up, until the force becomes equal and opposite to its weight.

...read more.

Middle


0.20         1.03         0.97         1.10                 1.04                 2.74                         2.63


Experiment 2
Mass (N) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s)   Average Time (s)    Average Velocity (m/s)*  Average Acceleration (m/s2)…
0.02         2.78         2.32         3.28               2.79                        1.02                         0.37
0.04         2.18         2.30         1.67               2.05                 1.39                         0.68
0.06         1.57         1.40         1.50               1.49                 1.91                         1.28
0.08         1.09         1.14         1.25               1.16                 2.46                         2.12
0.10         1.19         1.31         1.29               1.26                 2.26                         1.79
0.12         1.13         1.20         1.14               1.16                        2.46                         2.12
0.14         1.09         1.07         1.13               1.10                        2.59                         2.35
0.16         0.91         1.08         1.10               1.03                        2.77                         2.69
0.18         0.88         1.01         1.06               0.98                        2.91                         2.97
0.20         0.93         0.97         1.00               0.97                        2.94                         3.03


Averages Over Experiments 1 and 2
Mass (N)         Average Time (s)

...read more.

Conclusion


ii)         v2 = u2 + 2as
iii)         s = (u + v)
                       2

Unfortunately, without knowledge of the terminal velocity, or the real acceleration, this can’t be done properly. However, to give a rough idea of how it could be used, the test is detailed below:

In an attempt to acquire the most accurate results possible, albeit a futile attempt, the third formula will be used and the average velocity used in place of the terminal velocity.

1) To begin with, try the first set of results, i.e. a mass of 0.02 N:

s =
(0 + 0.93)
           2
\ s = 0.465

Quite obviously, this distance is nowhere near the actual distance of 2.85m but, of course, it shouldn’t be because with such a small mass, air resistance is still playing a major part.

2) Next, the results for a mass of 0.12 N will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.32)
            2
\ s = 1.16

Again, this is nowhere near the actual distance but it is getting closer.

3) Lastly, the results for the last mass, 0.20 N, will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.94)
             2
\ s = 1.47

It would appear then, in conclusion, that this test was a failure. The question is, though, is this because of the fact that the final velocity is obviously false, or because this is not the way to go about finding the “terminal” terminal velocity, which of course may not exist. In all likelihood, however, looking at the results, it does exist but without the actual values for the final, or terminal, velocity, it is difficult to prove its existence.

image02.pngimage00.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

    (kg m-3) Time it took (s) Distance travelled (cm) Velocity (ms-1) Viscosity (Nsm-2) % of increase 500 5324 1.5 25 0.167 1.92 450 5324 2.9 25 0.0862 3.71 48% 400 5324 5 25 0.05 6.5 43% 350 5324 8 25 0.0313 10.2 36% 300 5324 13 25 0.0192 16.7 39% 250 5324 28.9 25 0.00865 37

  2. Measuring the Viscosity of Honey

    1 Time (s) 2 Time (s) 3 Mean Time(s) Terminal Velocity = Distance/Time = (4cm) / time The means of the three readings should be taken for each of the distances the ball-bearing was dropped in, and then take the mean of the last two readings which should represent the terminal velocity.

  1. Investigation into the effect of temperature on viscosity

    The viscosity of the liquid remains constant at a constant temperature and pressure. But if the ball should veer off and make contact with the glass, the formulas would become invalid and the overall friction would change causing the ball to slow.

  2. To determine the relationship between mass and acceleration when force is kept constant.

    And if you attach more mass on the hook, then you would have a greater acceleration, so it goes at a greater velocity, so then less air resistance. From these facts I can begin to understand why my graph looks the way it does.

  1. Practical investigation into Viscosity in liquids (Stokes Law).

    Time taken(s) for ball bearing to pass through distance measured 1 2 3 Average 0-20 0.92 0.90 0.91 0.910 10-30. 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.767 20-40 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.487 30-50 0.48 0.46 0.46 0.467 40-60 0.49 0.48 0.47 0.480 Very large Distance Timed (cm)

  2. Pressure distribution over a symmetrical airfoil.

    Where p? is the static pressure in the free stream and U is the velocity. The coefficients may be determined directly from the monometer reading as follows: Cp = (h-hs) / (ha-hs) Where h is the reading for the tapping, hs is the static pressure in the tunnel and ha is the atmospheric pressure.

  1. Investigating the effect of mass on a parachute

    Mass (g) 0g 5g 10g 15g 20g 25g 1st Run 2nd Run 3rd Run 4th Run 5th Run 6th Run 7th Run 8th Run 9th Run 10th Run Pilot Test I am now going to construct a pilot test to test whether my method (detailed plan)

  2. The Area of a Parachute Compared To Its Rate of Descent

    Trends The trends of the results included the fact that the speed increased at an exponential rate, as shown on the graph. The total distance fallen averaged 2.99, but the standard deviation of those results was 0.148, which is comparatively close.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work