• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

James De Souza        Science 1        B.E.Tyler

To investigate the relationship between the velocity of a parachute and the drag force.

Viscosity :- The viscosity of a fluid is a measure of its resistance to flow. Viscous forces acting on bodies moving through a fluid and in fluids moving through pipes and channels. The pressure in a fluid decreases where the speed increases.

Stokes Law :-  An equation relating the terminal settling velocity of a smooth, rigid sphere in a viscous fluid of known density and viscosity to the diameter of the sphere when subjected to a known force field. It is used in the particle-size analysis of soils by the pipette, hydrometer, or centrifuge methods. The equation is:

V = (2gr²)(d1-d2)/9µ

where

V = velocity of fall (cm sec-¹),

g = acceleration of gravity (cm sec-²),

r = "equivalent" radius of particle (cm),

dl = density of particle (g cm -³),

d2 = density of medium (g cm-³), and

µ = viscosity of medium (dyne sec cm-²).

A falling object has an acceleration equal to g, provided air resistance is negligible. If air resistance is significant, the force due to air resistance drags on the object. This drag force increases as the object speeds up, until the force becomes equal and opposite to its weight.

...read more.

Middle


0.20         1.03         0.97         1.10                 1.04                 2.74                         2.63


Experiment 2
Mass (N) Time 1 (s) Time 2 (s) Time 3 (s)   Average Time (s)    Average Velocity (m/s)*  Average Acceleration (m/s2)…
0.02         2.78         2.32         3.28               2.79                        1.02                         0.37
0.04         2.18         2.30         1.67               2.05                 1.39                         0.68
0.06         1.57         1.40         1.50               1.49                 1.91                         1.28
0.08         1.09         1.14         1.25               1.16                 2.46                         2.12
0.10         1.19         1.31         1.29               1.26                 2.26                         1.79
0.12         1.13         1.20         1.14               1.16                        2.46                         2.12
0.14         1.09         1.07         1.13               1.10                        2.59                         2.35
0.16         0.91         1.08         1.10               1.03                        2.77                         2.69
0.18         0.88         1.01         1.06               0.98                        2.91                         2.97
0.20         0.93         0.97         1.00               0.97                        2.94                         3.03


Averages Over Experiments 1 and 2
Mass (N)         Average Time (s)

...read more.

Conclusion


ii)         v2 = u2 + 2as
iii)         s = (u + v)
                       2

Unfortunately, without knowledge of the terminal velocity, or the real acceleration, this can’t be done properly. However, to give a rough idea of how it could be used, the test is detailed below:

In an attempt to acquire the most accurate results possible, albeit a futile attempt, the third formula will be used and the average velocity used in place of the terminal velocity.

1) To begin with, try the first set of results, i.e. a mass of 0.02 N:

s =
(0 + 0.93)
           2
\ s = 0.465

Quite obviously, this distance is nowhere near the actual distance of 2.85m but, of course, it shouldn’t be because with such a small mass, air resistance is still playing a major part.

2) Next, the results for a mass of 0.12 N will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.32)
            2
\ s = 1.16

Again, this is nowhere near the actual distance but it is getting closer.

3) Lastly, the results for the last mass, 0.20 N, will be tried:

s =
(0 + 2.94)
             2
\ s = 1.47

It would appear then, in conclusion, that this test was a failure. The question is, though, is this because of the fact that the final velocity is obviously false, or because this is not the way to go about finding the “terminal” terminal velocity, which of course may not exist. In all likelihood, however, looking at the results, it does exist but without the actual values for the final, or terminal, velocity, it is difficult to prove its existence.

image02.pngimage00.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigating the effect of mass on a parachute

    Run 1.61 1.12 0.77 0.66 4th Run 1.43 0.93 0.70 0.70 5th Run 1.76 0.99 0.76 0.63 6th Run 1.60 1.12 0.71 0.72 7th Run 1.29 1.22 0.68 0.65 8th Run 1.67 1.03 0.79 0.62 9th Run 1.52 1.01 0.81 0.66 10th Run 1.55 0.96 0.78 0.68 After constructing a

  2. To determine the relationship between mass and acceleration when force is kept constant.

    Also, if looked at closely, the line of the results does not go through the origin of the graph. This tells me that, just like activation energy is needed to be overcome before a chemical reaction can occur, a force is needed to provide an initial 'jump-start'.

  1. Pressure distribution over a symmetrical airfoil.

    Where p? is the static pressure in the free stream and U is the velocity. The coefficients may be determined directly from the monometer reading as follows: Cp = (h-hs) / (ha-hs) Where h is the reading for the tapping, hs is the static pressure in the tunnel and ha is the atmospheric pressure.

  2. The effect of the temperature on the viscosity of the syrup.

    By doing this I was able to produce the following table: Distance (cm) Time (s) Velocity (ms-1) Acceleration (ms-2) 10 5.01 0.0199 10 9.10 0.0110 0.239 10 9.24 0.0108 0.233 10 10.0 0.01 0.199 10 10.1 9.90�10-3 0.195 10 10.2 9.80�10-3 0.191 10 11 9.10�10-3 0.164 10 11.1 9.01�10-3 0.162

  1. Practical investigation into Viscosity in liquids (Stokes Law).

    Time taken(s) for ball bearing to pass through distance measured 1 2 3 Average 0-20 0.86 0.84 0.85 0.850 10-30. 0.69 0.67 0.68 0.680 20-40 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.620 30-50 0.62 0.60 0.61 0.610 40-60 0.61 0.62 0.61 0.613 Medium Distance Timed (cm)

  2. Viscosity of Fluids

    2) If the concentration of the fluid were increased then the viscosity of the liquid would also increase. 3) The terminal velocity reached by the object passing through the liquid will decrease as the viscosity of the fluid increases. Apparatus 1 measuring cylinder Thermometer 750cm3 honey Stopwatch Ruler Magnets Ball bearing 5 beakers Balance Method 1)

  1. The Area of a Parachute Compared To Its Rate of Descent

    Frequency Width Height 2.86 2 2 1.43 2.87 1 1 2.87 2.88 5 5 0.58 2.93 1 1 2.93 2.97 2 2 1.48 3.04 1 1 3.04 3.06 2 2 1.53 3.09 1 1 3.09 3.24 1 1 3.24 3.28 1 1 3.28 3.32 1 1 3.32 Anomalous Results In this experiment, I have found 1 set of anomalous results.

  2. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    Stop the clock when the front of the trolley reaches the finish line 7. Record the time taken for the trolley to reach the finish, next to the relevant height, in a table 8. Repeat from step 4 twice more so you end up with three results for the same height then continue onto step 9 9.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work