• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What reasons do Dunlap and Catton give for the neglect of the physical environment in mainstream sociology?

Extracts from this document...


What reasons do Dunlap and Catton give for the neglect of the physical environment in mainstream sociology? There is a problem with the way humans interact and view their environment. This problem causes mankind to neglect, abuse and manipulate their surroundings with little or no regard for the consequences. Obviously, this causes many ills to all inhabitants of the forgotten earth, including humankind themselves. The latter is invariably recognized today by the public and through out academia, however as Dunlap and Catton highlight this was not the always the case and it is only a recent development. They highlight the fact that this strange behaviour seems to stem form the fact that human beings forgot along time ago that they are themselves part of nature. The concepts of enlightenment theory and conquest of nature are everyday reminders of this oversight. This essay will explore the reasons presented by Dunlap and Catton in the 1970's for why sociology has traditionally remained inept in accounting for rising environmental problems. It will focus on the effects of prevailing opinions about the environment, namely that of the dominant western worldview ands its implications on sociology which emerged as a discipline around the same time. It will further highlight the basic assumptions of the human exceptionalist paradigm (HEP) in sociology, which for Dunlap and Catton have served to procure the neglect of the physical environment in mainstream sociology. ...read more.


Once more many differences are socially induced rather that inborn, consequently they can be socially altered and convenient differences can be eliminated, thus there are no limits to progress. Further assumptions hold that social organization and technology will maintain a population within the carrying capacity of its environment, thus ensuring successful adaptation (Dunlap and Catton 1978, p43). Dunlap and Catton highlight how such a neglect of the physical environment permits sociologists such as Amos Hawley (1975, p8-9) to write that 'there are no known limits to the improvement of technology' and 'the population pressure on non-ecological resources is neither currently being felt or likely to be felt in the early future' (Hawley cited in 'The American Sociologist' vol. 13). The assumptions of the HEP are inherently problematic for Dunalp and Catton, and they cite David Potter's alert to his colleagues which they believe has equal relevance for sociology: 'The factor of abundance, which we first discovered as an environmental condition and which we converted by technological change into a cultural as well as a physical force, has (...) influenced all aspects of American life in a fundamental way' (Potter 1954, p141 cited in 'American Sociologist'): this is because it means that sociology basically ignores the concept of 'carrying concept', it also neglects the idea of the interrelation of living organisms within an ecosystem. ...read more.


For Dunlap and Catton these views influenced Sociology to the extent that within Sociology itself a Human Exceptionalist paradigm was formed and became the dominant view, which signaled the true neglect of the physical environment. Dunlap and Catton argued that this neglect was further reinforced by Sociology's need to establish its self as an independent field of study, especially with regard to its founding fathers, notably Durkheim's 'social facts'. Dunlap and Catton end, by calling for greater sociological attention to the environment, in line with rising public attention to environmental issues such as pollution, and advocate their own paradigm - NEP which is a critique of the HEP but also suggests that human beings should regard themselves as part of the eco-system and that human affairs are not simply affected by social and cultural factors but also by natural factors as well. They advocate growing awareness to environmental problems and a realist approach whereby sociology can make a contribution in terms of understanding these problems, through focus on interactions between society and nature and less adherence to HEP myths. Indeed there are further examples of realist approaches within Sociology such as Newby, Martell and Dickens support Dunlap and Catton's NEP and its implications for sociology. However there is still a long way for Sociology and indeed all other sciences to go before human beings understand the true implications of their actions upon the physical environment and its lasting effects for future generations! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Living Things in their Environment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Living Things in their Environment essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    biology instinctive behaviour

    3 star(s)

    In this example, the promise or possibility of rewards causes an increase in behaviour, but operant conditioning can also be used to decrease behaviour. The removal of an undesirable outcome or the use of punishment can be used to decrease or prevent undesirable behaviours.

  2. Describe the differences between natural ecosystems and ...

    The loss of dykes borders and willow trees has reduced the natural cover available for wildlife, and recent mechanical and herbicide use has kept vegetation away. Changing management practises have sought to increase productivity, and amalgamated fields by the removal of hedgerows.

  1. Compare and contrast the morphological features of Lamellibranches and Brachiopods

    with a distinct pallial line. They include: the nuculoid burrowing deposit feeders, the shallow burrowing non-siphonate forms lacking a pallial sinus, and deep burrowing siphonate forms identified by a distinct pallial sinus. Boring Shells are usually thick, equivalved, and cylindrical in cross section. Some forms are moderately ornamented with ridges and stout spines whereas others such as the "ship worms" are tubular in form.

  2. Evolution, Natural selection and Darwinism

    Homo habilis could be the path to modern humans, first to Homo erectus, leading to Homo sapiens. According to some fossil records Homo habilis was the first hominids to move out Africa. <Ref.1 - p662> Homo erectus ("Upright man") According to most accounts, Homo erectus was the first hominid to migrate out of Africa in to Europe and Asia.

  1. Fungal Pathogens in Humans.

    Another way the host's cells defend themselves is by withholding required nutrients such as iron and calcium from the intruders, sequestering them in the phagolysosomes (Weinberg 1999). In fact, there is a very low concentration of calcium in the very cells Histoplasma yeasts choose to call home.

  2. Animal behaviour and research into attitudes on animal testing.

    Some people oppose to this view and they believe that it's okay altogether to kill animals for food. Countless people in the world provide their pets with indecent welfare. Whether it's giving the wrong food or insufficient space, animals do suffer.

  1. Dog Behaviour

    Although no food was in sight, their saliva still dribbled. It turned out that the dogs were reacting to lab coats. Every time the dogs were served food, the person who served the food was wearing a lab coat. Therefore, the dogs reacted as if food was on its way whenever they saw a lab coat.

  2. Early Humans?

    afarensis, which is believed to be distantly ancestral to modern humans. If White et. al. are correct in their phylogeny, then Ar. ramidus would be the oldest known ancestor of modern humans. However, other researchers consider Ar. ramidus a sister taxon to australopithecines, that, is the two species diverged from a common ancestor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work