• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“WhiteTeeth successfully satirizes the contrasts and relationships between different cultures” - How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"White Teeth successfully satirizes the contrasts and relationships between different cultures." How far do you agree with this statement? "White Teeth" is a novel based on three, very different North London families, all of which are first, second or third generation immigrants. Zadie Smith provides us with a society portraying the clashing of cultures combined with a blending of race. She manages to use these ingredients to surround the story with witty and intelligent references of satire centred around the subject of race within a twentieth century London and the impact it has upon society in terms of relationships and contrasts between characters. Whereby satire is defined as contemporary issues or foolishness that is criticized by means of ridicule. One of the main and most obvious relationships within the novel is that of Samad and Archie. They are the central figures and their relationship is the basis for the combination of the two families. Samad, who is "a Bengali Muslim" and works as a waiter in a London restaurant, and Archie, who is a middle to lower class British man, that folds paper for a living. The situation in which their friendship originates is during their time serving in the Second World War. Zadie Smith uses this unlikely situation, in which they are both members of a five-man regiment in the claustrophobic surroundings of a tank, to create humour as we discover that the early stages of their relationship were not as content as the later stages. ...read more.

Middle

This unrecognisable behaviour puts Samad in denial and refers to Magid as being, "some clone, this is not an Iqbal." In addition, Zadie Smith uses the descriptive simile to depict Clara and Irie's hostility towards meeting Magid as they refer to it as being, "like switching on your favourite T.V soap only to find a beloved character slyly replaced by another actor with a similar haircut." This satirizes the inexistent relationship between Irie and Magid in comparison to their relationship as children although it may have been brief, and Irie's relationship with Millat. The separation from his brother has a negative effect on Millat; he turns to religious extremism with a militant Islamic group under the ironic Acronym of "KEVIN." This satirizes the intent of the group, which is to gain revenge on the Western world for oppressing non-white people. This adds humour to the serious contemporary issue of extremism in society today. The stupidity of the group is evident as Zadie Smith satirizes Millat's love for "DeNiro and Pacino gangster movies" which shows us that although Millat is serious when joining this group we know that it is partly only to satisfy his childhood dream of becoming a gangster. Before joining "KEVIN" Millat had become quite a sex icon, enjoyed watching gangster films and had become something of a local icon with all the different cultures and felt that, "he had to please all of the people...to the cockney wide-boys he was the joker...to the black boys he was fellow weed-smoker... ...read more.

Conclusion

Joshua rebels against his family's strangeness and their ingrained attitude of intellectual superiority by joining one of the main oppositions against his father, under the "Animal rights movement." Another group opposing Marcus' eccentric scientific experiment is the fundamentalist Islamic organization of, "KEVIN" in which Millat is a prominent member who fear that Marcus believes he can, "improve upon the creation of Allah," therefore seeing him as a huge threat. Zadie Smith also satirizes the final opposition presented within the novel which comes from Irie's grandmother who "causes a commotion" with her fellow old age pensioner Jehovah's Witnesses friends who question Irie's relationship with Marcus referring to her as the "secretary of the devil." Zadie Smith uses this combination of cultures towards the end of the novel to climax the ending and leaves us to contemplate whether our choices determine our future or whether fate leads us to an inevitable destiny. Anne fox has quoted that, "Smith sees the blending of cultures as not so much a reason to mourn the loss of "purity," but as a breeding ground for a new society where difference is secondary to living." She successfully deals with many contemporary issues within the novel such as race, ignorance, friendship and ethics, however the underlying subject is of the situation of immigrants failing to, or being able to gain acceptance in a foreign country. Although Zadie Smith satirizes the contrasts and relationships between different cultures, some people will agree that there is quite a large element of seriousness relating to the prejudice and relationships that immigrants inevitably face when living in a foreign country that possesses different ethics and principles. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. "Age is a social construct". How far do you agree with this statement?

    human beings have no natural defence mechanisms therefore adults protect the child, they will socialise the child and provide for it till the child meets the societies expectations of it being an adult. During this process the child has little or no responsibilities and is sent to school where he

  2. Compare and contrast white collar crimes and street crimes, while understanding the definition of ...

    These families, as Mark Glyptis, President of Independent Steelworkers Union stated, are very proud of what they do and seemingly love the business. While we examine the Weirton example the question is who is to blame? Certainly most will point the finger towards Bob Loughhead, some may say the board

  1. Langston Hughes's The Ways of White Folks,

    Here it didn't matter- color," (149). He meets a well-cultured black girl who invites him to visit her room (which happens to be in his hotel): "For the first time in his life Arnie was really happy. Somebody had offered him something without charity, without condescension, without prayer, without distance, and without being nice," (146).

  2. Does Boxing have a future?

    Oates 1987 concurs with this viewpoint and suggests that boxing remains, "the only major sport accessible to what are piously called the underprivileged." Boxing is subject to Elias's civilising process and the increased safety provision in recent years maybe an extension of a continuing regulatory approach to boxing that has

  1. “The Journey Towards Enlightenment”

    One begins seeing others in a divisive manner, partitioning people according to their differences. This divisive outlook subsequently leads to negative behavior. One begins alienating one's self from those one views as different. The once universal view of the world has been shattered and one's actions now reflect those new found prejudices.

  2. Compare and Contrast the representation of female characters in Snow White and Mulan. To ...

    Mulan also achieves nearly everything on her own. Although Mushu (a dragon sent to help Mulan) provides her with self-confidence and companionship he is no fairy godmother. All these things argue that Mulan's character does subvert the traditional idea of a heroine but there are also arguments that she still identifies with male authority instead of seeking her own empowerment.

  1. Gender-issues - which way forward

    and this... and this... and this..." (a list which changes wildly, even faster than women's fashions - a list which usually contains impossible demands and impossible contradictions) - in other words men are still viewed as 'human doings' rather than 'human beings'.

  2. Eugenics - good breeding.

    Since Muir, over 1200 people have stepped forward to file suits against the province, and all are getting reparations for damages done. The government ruined lives and families in the hopes of eliminating bad genetics from society. Despite the popularity of eugenics throughout the 20th century, the Catholic Church has always been a fervent opponent of such ideologies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work