A comparison of how gender is represented in Bond films - Goldeneye and Goldfinger

Authors Avatar

Jess Cox – 12LR                                                                  1105 Words

A comparison of how gender is represented in Bond films – Goldeneye and Goldfinger

There are two films in particular that I have chosen to look at that show how the representation of gender in Bond movies has changed throughout the years. These two films are ‘Goldeneye’ and ‘Goldfinger.’

There are many reasons that the representation of gender has changed between these two films.         The most obvious being a change in society. The two films were made thirty one years apart. Women are now accepted as being something more that just producing babies and being there to be slept with.

Between the Bond films ‘Licensed to Kill’ and ‘Goldeneye’ a lot of changes in characters were made. This is due to a lot of controversy about the portrayal of woman in the Bond films. People, especially women did not like, that women were being seen as week sex objects who had to rely on men to be saved.

Today’s society has changed a great deal since the first Bond films, women are now seen as equal to men, and have come into their own. This difference is shown in the films ‘Goldfinger’ and ‘Goldeneye.’

Join now!

One of the most important changes that showed how the representation of gender has changed was the fact that ‘M’ is now played by a woman, (In the earlier film ‘Goldfinger’ ‘M’ is played by a man.)

‘M’ in Goldeneye is now played by a woman and not by a typical Bond girl, but by a respectable, intelligent, mature woman who is seen just as capable of making decisions as a man.

The first woman that we saw in ‘Goldfinger’ is a belly dancer, dressed in next to nothing, and within a few minutes is seen semi ...

This is a preview of the whole essay