• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A struggle between freedom and power.

Extracts from this document...


Throughout history, it has been widely acknowledged that there has been a struggle between freedom and power and undeniably, this debate continues well into the 21st century. John Stuart Mill's essay On Liberty raises the point of whether in fact laws help to enforce liberty or whether in fact they act contrary to that objective by destroying it. Mill emphasises that the only purpose for power being rightfully exercised over any member of society, against his or her will, is to prevent harm to others. "the only part of the conduct of anyone for which he is amenable to society is that which concerns others" (Mill; 1989; pp 204). This fundamental concept is referred to as the 'Harm Principle'. The basic premise of Mill's 'Harm principle' is that a person should be able to make their own decisions and thus live with the respective consequences, but no one else should have to live with these consequences arising from that decision. "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others" (Mill 1989). To attain liberty, Mill states that it is imperative to have a strong and varied set of laws. ...read more.


However, when a person is only hurting him or herself, Mill states that people can advise him or her to adopt "self-regarding virtues" (Mill; 1989) but ultimately, each person has the complete freedom to make their own decision. If a person does not adopt qualities that others feel are important for personal wellbeing, society cannot publicly denounce these actions and beliefs, although they can hold their own personal negative opinions, actively encouraged by Mill. These private opinions are what ultimately may hurt a person who is not pursuing what society perceives as his or her own best interests. This is referred to as a natural penalty for holding beliefs that may be contrary to the majority in a democratic society. In addition to that natural penalty, Mill states that when someone is harming themselves,, the only harmed person is the perpetrator who is, in effect, giving and receiving their own punishment. Mill does, however, imply the imperativeness of a clear and definitive distinction between where individual liberty takes precedence and where and when society has the right to intervene and throughout On Liberty, Mill refutes the notion that society is based upon a mutual contract but does however, agree with the fact that once an individual has entered into the greater society, an individual has a distinct obligation not violate others' rights, ...read more.


Interestingly, Mill makes note that individuals should be punished for their actions if they are seriously affecting others "No society in which these liberties are not, on the whole, respected, is free, whatever may be its form of government; and none is completely free in which they do not exist absolute and unqualified. The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, as long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it. Each is the proper guardian of his own health, whether bodily, or mental and spiritual" (Mill, 1859, pp 201). Mill believes that society's judgements also provide punishment to offenders when they cannot be committed by law and actively encourages public scrutiny as part of the 'harm principle' which states clearly the fact that no society can function properly without such limitations in practice. The 'Harm Principle' sets out a number of interesting points pertaining to the achievement of individual freedom and right within the greater society. However, Mill states, in On Liberty that individual rights and freedoms can only be achieved when there are limits and constraints in place. Thus, Mill argues the importance of a range of strict guidelines which should be followed by everyone in society to prevent others from being affected by another human being's actions whilst at the same time still allowing personal autonomy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Assessment of Mill's 'Harm Principle'

    Objection: (ii) Confronting moral dilemmas and making up one's mind as to what one should do is an essential part of being human, and of growing in moral discrimination (which is valuable both in itself and in its effect on future behaviour).

  2. Integrative assesment strand

    plan for investigation - First stage complete 29th March - 16th April 2007 Development of report 16th April 2007 Second official meeting with tutor 16th April 2007 Submit report to be checked by tutor 18th April 2007 Submission of report - Stage two complete 18th - 25th April 2007 Evaluation

  1. Money and Power still remains with Caucasians

    Background There have been many surveys and statistics made into this topic as it effects every person in the world. I am going to analyse a few of these secondary sources of data for my research, which have been produced all over the world.

  2. Evaluate Mill's liberty principle. What does Mill mean by liberty? What other principles are ...

    He doesn't want people to blindly follow custom.1 One of the sections of the LP is the harm principle (HP). This principle states that there are two kinds of acts that a person can do. The first kind are self-regarding acts, which only affect the individual who is doing the

  1. The Cost of Freedom? Priceless.

    Instead of working with all the opportunities given to everyone in this country, some Blacks would rather sit and complain about what has been stolen from them and how much better they would feel about it if they "had a little bit more money" (Kennedy, 28).

  2. As the nineteenth century opened, life presented few opportunities for women to experience personal ...

    smile, and a glance that would not be abashed, looked around at her townspeople and neighbors" (115). Even without the further description of her beauty and physical bearing we already have a sense that this was not your average woman.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work