• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Abolishing the Electoral College

Extracts from this document...


AFF., Prime Minister Constructive J Hudson and Holden Scyster CMST 2063 Class 14 & 23 March 18, 2009 Resolution of Debate: The U.S. Government should abolish the Electoral College. Introduction I. Attention getter: In the 2000 Presidential election, over 500,000 of American citizens' votes did not count towards the election because we currently have an electoral college ("Presidential" par. 1). II. State Resolution: We have resolved that the U.S. Government abolish the Electoral College. Abolish meaning to do away with the Electoral College process as it currently stands, and we define the Electoral College as the number of electors per state that formally chose the President and Vice President of the United States. III. Thesis - We will affirm this resolution, and we will win this debate because our plan is the most beneficial, democratic way of voting for the United States President and Vice-President. Therefore, as our voting audience today, ask yourself what plan is the most democratic way for the American citizen to vote for these two positions. ...read more.


2. This process favors small states. Many large states are not given the amount of electoral votes than they should. According the Learn NC, University of North Carolina's Education Website, Wyoming is allowed 3 electoral votes, but California, that has 70 times Wyoming's population, only has 55 votes (Walbert par. 26). So, if you do the math with these two states, for this to be a fair process, California should have to have more than 200 electoral votes. C. The electoral vote is an all or nothing process, which wastes a person's vote, time, and efforts. 1. In 2000, Al Gore received 49.0002% of the Florida's popular vote, and George W. Bush received 49.0008% of the Florida's popular votes; however, all 25 Electoral votes went to Bush because he won by a .0006% margin ("Presidential" par. 1). This means that because of 500 votes, 3,000,000 Floridian citizens' votes were disregarded. Transition statement: Instead of actively disenfranchising the votes of millions of Americans, we should embrace these votes, and allow these to be counted for the Presidential Race. II. ...read more.


Essentially, with our plan, everyone's vote does count towards the two highest officials of the country. B. Each person's vote will count equally. 1. Everyone's individual vote will equal one vote for the President and Vice-President of the United States. No more Electoral College Vote per resident ratios, that we found to be faulty anyway, each state's citizens vote will count equally to all other forty-nine states citizens. 2. The President and Vice President will no longer be selected by 538 votes, it will be chosen by the millions of American voters that took time out of their day for their vote to count. As Mark Kettle from the Washington Post that was published December 22, 2008, in the 2000 Election it was like "total number of people who voted in the state of Idaho" didn't get to vote (Kettle par. 5). Today, we have presented why this plan is the most beneficial and democratic way for people to cast thier ballot for President and Vice President. Therefore, on the team that will win this debate, I am proud to ask for the popular vote of this class. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Who Voted Nazi and Why?

    They had success in small to medium sized towns and in the suburbs of the cities. These are the places that the middle classes were likely to live. The mainly working class SPD also saw its share of the vote fall between 1928 and 32, but in quite a minor

  2. Who won their debate - Miliband or Poulantzas?

    Less radically, many functionalists argue that social groups have emergent properties, that is, characteristics that are produced when individuals interact but are not reducible to individuals. Against this, methodological individualists claim that all such functionalist arguments rest ultimately on assumptions about individual behaviour.'

  1. Environmental Lessons From History.

    (Bahn and Flenley; 1992). This is once again gleaned from botanical evidence. There are so many theories about why the statues were originally made, what their purpose was and how they were moved into position, that it might be worth relating the words of Jo Anne van Tillburg, an archaeologist

  2. The cannabis debate

    ailments such as muscle cramps, menstrual cramps, rheumatism and the convulsions of tetanus, rabies and epilepsy. In 1890 Queen Victoria is prescribed cannabis for period pains. Her personal doctor, Sir Robert Russell, claims: 'It is one of the most valuable medicines we possess.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work