• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Against the background of Marxist views on Law, State, Class, and Property analyse the critique of 'Religion' and 'The Family'.

Extracts from this document...


Question Against the background of Marxist views on Law, State, Class, and Property analyse the critique of 'Religion' and 'The Family'. Answer Marxism is a social theory whose basic proposition is that social change is driven by class conflict. The class is determined by its relationship to the means of commodity production, distribution and exchange. Within a capitalist society the capitalist class control the means of production and the working class provide the means of labour from which surplus value is expropriated by the capitalist class. The surplus value so expropriated is used to develop and shape the institutions in society to serve the interests of the capitalist class and perpetuate their dominance. In this theory the state and its laws provide the primary control mechanisms for ensuring a subordinated and compliant working class. Religion provides the moral and spiritual edifice to justify the circumstances that the working class find themselves in. The institution of the family provides both a functional role in producing and socialising the labour force required by the capitalist economy. In order to understand how, within the Marxist paradigm, the various institutions of a capitalist society can contribute to the maintenance of the capitalist system, we need to explore the key institutions of the state, law, class, property, religion and the family. Within the history of man we can see that societies have existed without a formally instituted state. This can be seen in societies such as the antipodean aborigines or the American Indians. ...read more.


Thus as McIntyre says 'in ancient Greek religion, the power of necessity was personified (i.e. need - ananke)'. George Thomas stated 'the gods are personifications of the powers that dominate human life.' With this in mind, once these powers - nature - do not dominate mans life there will be no need for religion. This is how Marx hopes to do away with religion. Marxist sees religion as the explanation of the phenomena that is seen all around us that are alternative to a scientific explanation. Marx, being a materialist, inherited the belief of 'being' precedes consciousness and not vice versa. By 'being' Marx understood it to mean the essence of man - meaning all that is - which is understood as a 'complex organisation of atoms'. Engels relates 'matter in motion' as the formula for this. Since everything can be explained under this formula, religious explanations of phenomena have to be excluded. Marxists also see another side to religion not just as the 'opiate of the masses' or 'a sigh of the oppressed' but as the 'heart of the heartless world' Due to the fact that a completely secular world had 'not emerged among the working class, or progressive intellectuals for that matter' (MacIntyre), Marx viewed religion as having a reactionary role in perpetuating the existing order. However, religion is not a matter of intellect but social needs. If the objective circumstances that produce these needs were removed then religion would become obsolete. Engels thought the English working class was in the ideal state for secularization. ...read more.


Marx believed that under capitalism production within the family has been separated from production organised as wage labour so that the 'economic' functions of the family are obscured. Material production was understood as to be natural prior to capitalism, however economic production under capitalism is understood to be as a 'human' realm outside nature (Mitchell et al). As industrial capitalism developed there was transference of the economic production from the family unit to the large-scale corporate unit. In conclusion we can see that capitalism has inherited the authoritarian family. Capitalism draws from 'the past' and uses the family to 'support its main mechanisms of social control.' But religion is significantly different; both in character and function from Marxism, and this can be said of the authoritarian family. The family and religion do not stand already completed, somehow outside capitalism. They exist as interacting dimensions of capitalist life, helping to shape the same mode of production, which in the last analysis determines their particular forms and functions. Marxist views on the institutions of society derive from, and are the consequences of class conflict. Each social formation will have a dominant class. Under capitalism the capitalist exercise hegemony. However they have inherited social institutions, Law, State, Family and Religion and these will be shaped to form the ideological and real components of social and personal life. This shaping is an expression of the interest of the dominant class as these evolve over time. We have seen how the state and its laws have developed to strengthen the social relations of production that are required to sustain the capitalist mode of production. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Turner sees the reason for religion being of less importance in today's society because wealth lies in the hands of corporations not land and property, therefore religion is an optional extra for modern capitalist societies. Functionalism and Marxism approaches to the role of religion are both that it is there as a form of social cement, to keep society stable.

  2. Different views on the family.

    He wrote this in the year, 1884. Engles traced back humanity, thinking that perhaps the family and its structure were evolutionary. Engles found that early humanity communally owned the means of production. The family did not exist. He also found that primitive communism was promiscuous, containing no rules upon sex.

  1. The Family As A Social Institution

    When a family is not a cohesive nurturing unit we will find problems. It can of course be argued that a lot of these so called problems only exist because of the way in which we continue to idealise the perfect nuclear family and when as individuals we see that

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    This is the socialisation process that Marx believed led to their being such an unfair, closed or caste system with no chance of meritocracy. Marxism stresses the negative view on the substructure believing that the representatives of the state are put into their positions of power by the bourgeoisie, and

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    These life crises are surrounded by rituals e.g. Christening, funerals etc. * Prediction and Control: Undertaking that cannot be controlled or predicted also produces tension and anxiety. Malinowski noted that such events were surrounded by rituals. Rituals reduce anxiety by providing confidence and a feeling of control. Malinowski argues that religion promotes social solidarity by dealing with situations of emotional stress that threaten the stability of society.

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    It still babysits for children if needed and helps out as much as it can. Also, they believe this is because there are other ways that they can now keep in touch with each other such as telephone calls and emails.

  1. Invisible Man: A Universally Applicable Tale of One Man's Journey of Self-Discovery.

    Even unseen and invisible to all around him, the stereotypes of African-Americans as perceived by white people persevered in the narrator's interactions with others. Throughout the novel, stereotypical roles are thrust on the narrator, simply because he is a black man.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    --When the normatively valid is the object of empirical investigation, its normative validity is disregarded. Its existence and not its validity is what concerns the investigator. --An example of what NOT to do: Because the state is tremendously important and has a great deal of power in modern life, people

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work