• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Against the background of Marxist views on Law, State, Class, and Property analyse the critique of 'Religion' and 'The Family'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question Against the background of Marxist views on Law, State, Class, and Property analyse the critique of 'Religion' and 'The Family'. Answer Marxism is a social theory whose basic proposition is that social change is driven by class conflict. The class is determined by its relationship to the means of commodity production, distribution and exchange. Within a capitalist society the capitalist class control the means of production and the working class provide the means of labour from which surplus value is expropriated by the capitalist class. The surplus value so expropriated is used to develop and shape the institutions in society to serve the interests of the capitalist class and perpetuate their dominance. In this theory the state and its laws provide the primary control mechanisms for ensuring a subordinated and compliant working class. Religion provides the moral and spiritual edifice to justify the circumstances that the working class find themselves in. The institution of the family provides both a functional role in producing and socialising the labour force required by the capitalist economy. In order to understand how, within the Marxist paradigm, the various institutions of a capitalist society can contribute to the maintenance of the capitalist system, we need to explore the key institutions of the state, law, class, property, religion and the family. Within the history of man we can see that societies have existed without a formally instituted state. This can be seen in societies such as the antipodean aborigines or the American Indians. ...read more.

Middle

Thus as McIntyre says 'in ancient Greek religion, the power of necessity was personified (i.e. need - ananke)'. George Thomas stated 'the gods are personifications of the powers that dominate human life.' With this in mind, once these powers - nature - do not dominate mans life there will be no need for religion. This is how Marx hopes to do away with religion. Marxist sees religion as the explanation of the phenomena that is seen all around us that are alternative to a scientific explanation. Marx, being a materialist, inherited the belief of 'being' precedes consciousness and not vice versa. By 'being' Marx understood it to mean the essence of man - meaning all that is - which is understood as a 'complex organisation of atoms'. Engels relates 'matter in motion' as the formula for this. Since everything can be explained under this formula, religious explanations of phenomena have to be excluded. Marxists also see another side to religion not just as the 'opiate of the masses' or 'a sigh of the oppressed' but as the 'heart of the heartless world' Due to the fact that a completely secular world had 'not emerged among the working class, or progressive intellectuals for that matter' (MacIntyre), Marx viewed religion as having a reactionary role in perpetuating the existing order. However, religion is not a matter of intellect but social needs. If the objective circumstances that produce these needs were removed then religion would become obsolete. Engels thought the English working class was in the ideal state for secularization. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx believed that under capitalism production within the family has been separated from production organised as wage labour so that the 'economic' functions of the family are obscured. Material production was understood as to be natural prior to capitalism, however economic production under capitalism is understood to be as a 'human' realm outside nature (Mitchell et al). As industrial capitalism developed there was transference of the economic production from the family unit to the large-scale corporate unit. In conclusion we can see that capitalism has inherited the authoritarian family. Capitalism draws from 'the past' and uses the family to 'support its main mechanisms of social control.' But religion is significantly different; both in character and function from Marxism, and this can be said of the authoritarian family. The family and religion do not stand already completed, somehow outside capitalism. They exist as interacting dimensions of capitalist life, helping to shape the same mode of production, which in the last analysis determines their particular forms and functions. Marxist views on the institutions of society derive from, and are the consequences of class conflict. Each social formation will have a dominant class. Under capitalism the capitalist exercise hegemony. However they have inherited social institutions, Law, State, Family and Religion and these will be shaped to form the ideological and real components of social and personal life. This shaping is an expression of the interest of the dominant class as these evolve over time. We have seen how the state and its laws have developed to strengthen the social relations of production that are required to sustain the capitalist mode of production. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Calvinists often look for reassuring "signs" which include working hard, material success gained through work and living a sober life. This gives rise to capitalism, Weber argues, by making it possible for people to accumulate wealth and reinvest it, property was seen as a sign of moral degradation so people

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    Companies, land and wealth, all prestigious buying power to ensure the best for their offspring. Next religion, Marx argued, was the opiate of the people, stupefying them into believing that the rich have more chance of passing through the eye of a needle than going to heaven.

  1. The Family As A Social Institution

    we are not in this perfect set up it can lead us to feel as if we have failed and how often do you hear "he had such a bad home life that's why he turned out so bad, She was sexually abused as a child that's why she's a drug addict etc.

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    Also, these could include the families having children outside of marriage. Overall, this graph shows how the changes in roles, such as the woman becoming somewhat equal to the man in the family, have altered the structure of the family.

  1. Functionalist views on Religion.

    These life crises are surrounded by rituals e.g. Christening, funerals etc. * Prediction and Control: Undertaking that cannot be controlled or predicted also produces tension and anxiety. Malinowski noted that such events were surrounded by rituals. Rituals reduce anxiety by providing confidence and a feeling of control. Malinowski argues that religion promotes social solidarity by dealing with situations of emotional stress that threaten the stability of society.

  2. The Hidden Curriculum; Hegemony and Capitalism.

    The power of grading and assessing students is largely related to developing a social stratification within schools. Through academic streaming students are being moulded into classes such as a working class or higher class. This is simply achieved through segregating those students who display academic talents and providing them with

  1. Defining religion.

    religion contributes is Marx was of explaining why the oppressed don't perceive & do something about their situation o It's impossible to prove/disprove - how do we know when awareness is correct/incorrect? o Certainly those who hold religious beliefs don't think of them in these terms & it's a major

  2. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    The long term demise of industry is also more acceptable to the middle class electorate than a rapid financial crisis, which is likely to shake their faith in the incumbent party. This situation works to the detriment of those reliant on manufacturing and industry, again the working class and many ethnic-minority groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work