• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family. Initially we have to consider do functionalists really contribute to our understanding family, additionally if they do how valuable is their perspective and does it still reflect on contemporary society. Functionalists view the family as an institution, which improves society by obtaining equilibrium and social order and stability; they also feel the family should not be studied in isolation but in terms of its contribution to the wider society. Therefore they feel the family does not benefit the individual, but the family is beneficial to the whole of society, in other words they are not too concerned of the individual as they opt to look at the macro-perspective. For instance the family prepares children to become adult workers in various ways for example by passing down their norms and values. Conversely there is the interpretive and symbolic interactionists approach that oppose the views of functionalists and feel the family should be studied in isolation and you should look at the individual, as they tend to advocate the micro-perspective of society. Nevertheless a group who shares the same views, as functionalists, are the New Right. These views being that the stability of the family is an important and integral ingredient for harmony and equilibrium of society. New Right and functionalists felt that the family was the 'heart' of society and both views wanted society to return to 'the days' where there was a true, traditional nuclear family. ...read more.

Middle

Primary socialisation refers to socialisation during the early years of childhood that takes place mainly within the family, in other words the teaching of norms and values to children, usually from parents. Parsons felt there were two basic processes involved in primary socialisation: the internalisation of society's culture and the structuring of the personality. Firstly, parsons felt that unless culture is internalised, that is absorbed and accepted, society would cease to exist, since without shared norms and values social life would not be possible. However, culture is not simply learned, it is 'internalised as part of the personality structure'. The child's personality is moulded in terms of the central values of the culture to the point where they become apart of him or her. Additionally, Parsons argued that families are 'factories' that produce human personalities. He believed that they are essential for this purpose since primary socialisation requires a context, which provides warmth, security and mutual support. He could conceive of no institution other than the family that could provide this context. Once produced, the personality must be kept stable. This principle guides us to the second basic function of the family being the stabilisation of adult personalities. The emphasis here is on the marriage and the emotional security the couple provide for each other. This acts as a counterweight to the stresses and strains of everyday life that tend to make the personality unstable. In other words, this emphasises the need for the family to avoid psychological pressures of life that may disturb the adult personality. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the contribution of functionalist to our understanding of the family can be questioned, although they are supported by views of the New Right who are not a sociological perspective, but a political perspective that see the family as a cornerstone of society. Additionally they share the functionalist's view that the stability of the family is important to maintain the equilibrium of society. Nevertheless their views are considered more political than sociological and they fail to consider the disadvantages of the nuclear family and disagree with alternatives such as homosexuality. With other theoretical approaches suggesting functionalist only looks at the good side of the family I feel its contribution is vital especially as Leach and Laing provided a balance to the functionalist view that has dominated sociological thinking if the family for many years. Leach was an anthropologist who studied small pre-industrial societies felt that their were pressures between husband and wife due to stress and that they are performing all of the tasks within the family unit and this could lead to members rebelling and fighting. Laing was a phenomenological psychiatrist ad he was concerned with the interaction within the family and the meanings that developed in that context. Overall, Laing in particular has given important insights into the interaction patterns within the family, and in doing so he may have come closer to family life as it is actually experienced than do many of the more orthodox presentations. Therefore it can be assumed that functionalism is a key aid to our understanding but with the criticisms it gains I feel it is obligatory that we look at other perspectives to give us a deeper insight to the meaning of family. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a very detailed essay and covers a huge amount of content and key writers. There is also a good balance between the outline of Functionalist views and critical analysis. The essay at times feels cluttered and clearer structure and paragraphing would make the flow of the essay easier to read. Overall mark: ****

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 07/05/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    From a Marxist viewpoint, the relationship between the two social classes is one of mutual dependence and conflict. Thus in a capitalist society, the bourgeoisie and proletariat are dependent upon each other. One cannot exist without the other. Labourers must sell their labour in order to make a living, as

  2. "Men and women have different roles to play in modern society." Discuss

    this bond between mother and child will last until the child reaches his teenage years, when the father and other role models will shape the child's life. The father can assume the tasks and responsibilities of a mother, but he cannot recreate this bond.

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Marx argues religion is the "Opium of the people," and is an illusion, which eases the pain of exploitation and oppression. The poor are placed in a state of false consciousness through a process of socialisation. Religion eases the pain of oppression of the working class by a number of ways.

  2. Is sociology a science?

    Theoretically, they also believe that sociological theories are based on assumptions concerning the nature of reality that are themselves really based on theories or ideologies. Cumulatively, they believe that society is dynamic and therefore sociology is dynamic. Society is always changing and therefore sociological theories of one hundred years ago may not apply in the same way today.

  1. Discuss the relationship between social class and educational achievement.

    In 1998, eighty per cent of those from professional backgrounds entered higher education at eighteen, compared to just fourteen per cent of those from the unskilled backgrounds. Hence, those from the higher class had five times the chance of those from the lower class of going onto a degree-level course.

  2. Machiavelli's Theory Of The State.

    Machiavelli was now greatly influenced by those rulers hell bent on corruption power and greed. Power was more important than any moral or philosophical course. He was still loyal to the state but he now realised that although the prince must build his state on the goodwill of the people and respect his subjects.

  1. Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

    Murdock ignores family diversity and Parsons ignores variation in the family such as different ethnic groups view on the family.

  2. How the film "Outsourced" shows the effects of culture shock on an American in ...

    Because Todd?s job and entire department are outsourced, he reluctantly travels to India to train his replacement. Everything in India is new, stranger and different from things in his country. As soon as he first contact with Indian culture, he has met difficulties in language, transportation, food, lifestyle, attitude and so on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work