• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the contributions that functionalists, Marxist's and feminists have made to the study of the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the contributions that functionalists, Marxist's and feminists have made to the study of the family Sociologists may be in broad agreement over the idea that the family institution is clearly related to other social institutions, however individuals and groups of sociologists differ in the way they interpret this relationship. Those writers who emphasise the generally functional nature of this relationship are Structural Functionalists. Those writers who, while agreeing that the family performs certain functions, emphasise the way in which these functions are closely linked to the economic structure of any society are Conflict Marxist theorists. Those writers who interpret the relationship between family and wider society in terms of power relationships between men women are Feminist Conflict theorists Marxists tend to see institutions like the family in terms of what they do to support a certain structure within capitalist society. Unlike functionalist sociology, conflict sociology tends to see things from more than one angle. Feminist sociology tend to see societal relationships in terms of how it exploits another part of society due to gender (i.e.: men exploiting women.) Two well known functionalists are Murdock and Parsons, Murdock defined the family as: "The family is a social group characterised by common residence, economic co-operation and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the sexually co-habitating adults" His research was based upon the analysis of two hundred and fifty societies. ...read more.

Middle

Marxists agree that the family Is a social institution, and serves some purpose in society . However they believe that the family has mainly exploitative aspects and serves to exploit and oppress. A leading Marxist, Fredriech Engels, believes in the evoloution of the family- that in the early stages of human development, the means of production was communally owned and the modern day family did not exist- This era of primitive communism was characterised by promiscuity. There were no rules limiting sexual relationships. Although Engels has been criticised for this view of human society, anthropologist Kathleen Gough argues that this may be quite close to the truth. She says that the nearest relation to man, the chimpanzee, live in promiscuous hordes and this may have been the pattern for early man. Engels says that the nuclear family developed as human people put more restrictions on property and partners. Thus, the monogamous relationship developed with the emergence of private property. Engels theory was largely based on an erroneous interpretation of the family by the nineteenth century anthropologist Lewis Henry Morgan . Modern research tells us that many of his details were incorrect. This casts a shadow of doubt over Engels theory of the evolution of the family. Essentially, in Marxist terms, the family is a means by which the rich, or the bougesiose, maintain oppression of the poor, or the proletariat, the family also functions to produce a workforce for the bougesiose. ...read more.

Conclusion

The many groups within sociology which have differing opinions on family structure use evidence which supports their cause. Feminists choose statistics which best show that women are oppressed within the family, Marxists choose data which best shows exploitation. All the different groups may have a valid viewpoint, but they fail to respond to the claims made by the other groups and ignore the wider spectrum of society as a whole. The Marxists have provided a view of a grossly exploited society, the feminists have provided the same view although they replaced class exploitation for male domination and the functionalists have provided an idealistic view. These are all useful, as they describe a certain section of society or show us someone's view of the family but ambiguity is also nessacery, as we need to remember that some evidence is often biased. All in all, the different and often conflicting sides in sociology have shaped the way we perceive and define the family. Marxism has shown that sometimes, the family can be a tool for oppression and exploitation and the functionalists have given an idealistic view of the family, one that has been our societies norm for years. They have all contributed to the study of the family and as societies culture changes, so will our definition of the family unit. Sociology A level essay: ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    and the ideology of the compulsory heterosexuality are both being broken down and as a consequence our traditional notions of family life and relationships are changing. O'Donnell (4) explains, "The number of homosexual couples who bring up children is small but increasing", shares this view.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    This criteria makes it possible to generalise with more accuracy. Typical study = cross-section, generalisable, proportionately similar characteristics. Representative Sample = Make sure people studied have the same characteristics are the rest of the group from which they are selected.

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    West Indian's and their subsequent generations could eventually become completely absorbed into British society. (Haralambos, 2005, page 220) Patterson's study of "Dark Strangers", is revolutionary in so far as it removes the emphasis of 'colour' from the 'race' debate, extending new meaning to the reasons of segregation within the British multi-cultural society.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Every increase of rationalism in empirical science increasing pushes religion from the rational into the irrational realm; but only today does religion become the irrational or anti-rational supra-human power. The less magic or merely contemplative mysticism and the more pure doctrine a religion contains, the greater is its need of rational apologetics.

  1. 'Assess the contribution made by feminists' sociologists to the study of the family'

    The also believe that the family is patriarchal as men and women's role in the family are fundamentally unequal in terms of economic gain and emotional satisfaction. Radical feminist' (Delphy and Leonard) contend that all families are based on a social structure where there are two roles 1)

  2. How do feminists explain inequality between the sexes and how do they seek to ...

    Where did inequality start? How is it maintained? But mostly, if gaining the vote didn't end equality than what would? These questions were the main focus of second wave feminism, which emerged decades later in the 60's. Second wave feminism aimed at achieving the goals that first wave feminism failed

  1. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    (Haralambos, 2000, page 131) The functionalist perspective suggests that the traditional roles of men and women are the most conducive to the smooth operation of society. Functionalists have taken Murdock's biological explanation, for the division of labour, as the fundamental principles from which to base their analysis of 'sex roles'

  2. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    MEASURING THE STATUS OF OCCUPATION Understanding occupational mobility is a complicated process because the occupational structure intersects with other structures, such as industry, and is differentiated by a variety of factors including region, locality, ethnic group, etc. The authors thus simplify the analysis by focusing on vertical mobility, but do not deny that other processes operate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work